Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Vladimir rules and Obama bombs

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Well Said 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 11/1/13

Become a Fan
  (111 fans)
- Advertisement -
Source: RT

US President Barack Obama (AFP Photo/Saul Loeb)

On both the NSA saga and the Syrian crisis, Putin played chess while Obama played checkers with himself -- and lost.

Every year, Forbes magazine publishes its list of the heads of state, financial titans and business moguls who "truly rule the world." Predictably, a sitting US president -- the commander-in-chief of the most lethal armada in the history of the world -- usually gets the top spot.

Not in 2010 though, when Barack Obama was overtaken by then Chinese President Hu Jintao in the aftermath of the Wall Street-provoked financial crisis. And not in 2013, when the winner is Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

Not by accident, China and Russia are the most influential among the BRICS group of emerging powers. The US corporate media's rankings such as Time's Person of The Year may be irrelevant, and usually extremely provincial. But as a PR coup, American recognition of Putin's soft power is priceless, even coming after de facto recognition by the overwhelming majority of the real "international community': the developing world.

- Advertisement -

To its credit, Forbes stresses how "anyone watching this year's chess match over Syria and the National Security Agency leaks has a clear idea of the shifting individual power dynamics."

Reuters/Juan Medina

But it goes way, way beyond that. Putin let the extremely sensitive Edward Snowden case be handled with total, absolute legality and transparency, and on top of it without gloating over American impotence. Putin literally saved the Obama administration, at the last minute, from yet another Middle-East war of potentially devastating consequences -- a geopolitical juncture as dangerous as the Cuban missile crisis.  

Predictably, US Think Tankland -- with its collective IQ atrophied by decades of hubris and the normalization of the Orwellian/Panopticon complex -- has had a hard time facing the facts. Moscow does not need to try to portray the hyperpower as weak and/or untrustworthy. The facts speak for themselves -- from the galloping towards war because of a fictitious "red line" recklessly concocted by Obama to the ubiquitous spying on "friends" and potential foes alike.

During a House Intelligence Committee hearing, National Intelligence Director James Clapper was adamant that the NSA and the CIA cannot spy on any political leader via his/her private mobile phones without permission from the White House. So no matter the spin, Obama knew, among others, about the spying on Brazilian President Dilma Rouseff and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.  

- Advertisement -

You don't need to have read Orwell to note this is yet another instance of the imperial Masters of the Universe worldview. It's "legitimate' to spy on Americans. It's "legitimate" to spy all over the global South -- including the more influential BRICS.

Reuters / Kai Pfaffenbach
Reuters/Kai Pfaffenbach

Call it electronic neo-feudalism -- where no one, anywhere is a real citizen fully capable of exercising his/her rights; just some sort of un-glorified peasant. With Merkel the story is slightly different; she's part of the Masters of the Universe club, and that's the only reason why some in Washington are wondering if -- in a very mild way -- the NSA may have gone too far.

Enough exceptionalism

That famous September op-ed in The New York Times, in which Putin blasted American exceptionalism, reverberated wildly all across the developing world because it worked like a primal scream. The Chinese, naturally cautious, would never be the first to articulate it so blatantly (they did it only later, when they called for a "de-Americanized" world, with an economic emphasis rather than political). Forget about the Europeans, or even Brazil. Only Putin had the authority to announce what the overwhelming majority of the planet had been thinking for quite a while.

Nobody can stand US exceptionalism anymore. Yet another example; the duly spied-upon UN General Assembly has voted -- overwhelmingly -- to condemn the US commercial, economic and financial embargo against Cuba for the 22nd year in a row. The vote was 188-2, with three abstentions. Only the US and Israel voted against it.

Vladimir Putin (Reuters / Alexander Zemlianichenko / Pool)
Vladimir Putin (Reuters/Alexander Zemlianichenko/Pool)

While the dogs of war and surveillance bark, the silent Russian caravan passes. Putin is extending Russian influence in Central Europe as well as solidifying the partnership with Germany. The Chinese-Russian strategic partnership is proceeding smoothly. Russia is back as an influential player in the Middle East. Putin is trying to create a viable, multilateral alternative to imperial US diktats. This is as much about soft power as hard power.  

The proverbial US Think Tankland Cassandras will be left endlessly carping about the "stagnating" Russian economy, ethnic and religious "tension," "political atrophy" because of Putin's "authoritarianism," and assorted ills. Nonsense. This essay by top blogger The Saker meticulously outlines the key plot twists and undercurrents of the past 20 years of US-Russia relations -- including the now-proverbial Putin demonization.

Back to the facts on the geopolitical ground. Putin has seized the moment and now is arguably the key actor trying to build an emerging, alternative multilateral order. As for imperial lame duck Obama, he seems destined to keep bombing in more ways than one. 

 

Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times. His regular column, "The Roving Eye," is widely read. He is an analyst for the online news channel Real News, the roving correspondent for Asia Times/Hong Kong, an analyst for RT and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

The IMF goes to war in Ukraine

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Washington and Wall St. both deserve their comeupp... by intotheabyss on Friday, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:52:23 PM
Mr. Escobar rocks the house again.... by John Rachel on Friday, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:58:58 PM
We can only hope that in the course of their fall,... by mhenriday on Saturday, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:43:44 AM