Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   17 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why The Republicans Lost

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 11/19/08

Become a Fan
  (3 fans)
- Advertisement -

The election season is over, at least until the spring when BC will hold its provincial elections in May. The BC municipal elections saw quite a bit of turnover, but the big attention getter for many of us was the US election where history was made as that country elected its first president with visible African heritage. Elected, too, with a healthy majority, leading the Republican by over eight million votes.
The dust hadn't settled on election night before the Republican Party began trying to find someone to blame for their loss. The right wing nut bars blamed John McCain for being too moderate, the main stream members sought to pin the blame on the choice of Sarah Palin as the VP candidate to appease the fanatics.
In reality the main reason that the Republicans lost is probably because they ran their campaign against the wrong person. There is no doubt that a large majority of the American people like Barack Obama far more than they like George W. Bush. Instead of attacking Obama, the Republicans would have had more traction with most voters if they would have attacked Bush and his administration, and repudiated much of its policies. This, of course, would have meant a different choice for VP, much to the displeasure of the rabid right, but it would have sent the message that the Republicans were ready to return to the mainstream of the American political scene.
The prognosis for the Republican Party might not be too good if they can not find a new consensus between those with traditional conservative Republican values, and the extremists characterized by John Bircher types and religious weirdos. A consensus that must be created by the extremists moving considerably leftward toward the mainstream, back to the party of Eisenhower, Teddy Roosevelt and Lincoln. Even moving back to Ronald Reagan would be an improvement. In fact, in an article posted on titled "Why McCain Lost" Reagan's son Michael even said that his dad would have probably voted for Obama.
Despised by Americans of all political affiliation, there is little doubt that George W. Bush will be remembered as one of the worst presidents in the history of the United States. A barely mediocre person with powerful supporters who used him as their front man to run the country, more aptly, to run the country into the ground. A president who was in deep trouble before the gentlemen from Saudi Arabia made the attacks of September 11, 2001, and allowed irrational, reactionary fear to become the deciding factor in American politics for almost six years.
The legacy of George Bush will smell like a dead fish, and smell a long time to come, and if the Republican Party wants to regain power any time soon, it will probably have to either deal with this fact or hope that the new administration quickly loses credibility. Given the Republican's record of the past eight years the Democrats will have to screw up big time before their credibility is gone. And, the Republicans won't deal with the Bush legacy very well if the party turns to Sarah Palin for leadership, at least not if she doesn't change the perception that she represents the bozo side of the party.
Palin is a very charismatic and entertaining person, and most of us can not help but like her on a personal basis, but behind the facade there is either no intellectual depth, or she has conscientiously chosen to play to the wrong audience. Either is not a trait that would make her a leader good for the United States.
There is no doubt that the American political scene will be providing much of interest over the next year as the Democrats take control of the nation. What may be the most interesting will be whether or not the Republicans can resolve their internal conflict.
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


Jerry West grew up on a farm in California and is currently Editor and Publisher of THE RECORD newspaper in Gold River, BC. Graduate with Honors and graduate school, UC Berkeley. Member, Phi Beta Kappa. Vietnam veteran and Former Sgt. USMC

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

There Is No Cornucopia

The New Feudalism

Environmental Sustainability - The Core Issue of Our Times

Who Put Christ In The Solstice?

Tea-baggers Are A Riot

Why The Republicans Lost


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 17 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
You hit the nail on the head with this one. Theore... by Matthew Peters on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:11:04 PM
....Quite interesting to watch how the in-fighting... by Deborah Wells on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:54:08 PM
Name the corrupt people in his cabinet?Where can I... by Sharon Roach on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:09:41 PM
Bush was a tool and McCain allowed himself to beco... by mnmike44 on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:55:04 PM
You mentioned Michael Reagan's article, but let's ... by Alan Williams on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:49:28 PM
The implication of Michael Reagan's statement ... by Jerry West on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:52:46 PM
I am glad you set the record straight about Reagan... by Tony Duncan on Friday, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:05:31 AM
At the Tuesday-morning meeting with committee staf... by Alan Williams on Friday, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:53:25 PM
All of the highly debatable opinion pieces that yo... by Jerry West on Saturday, Nov 22, 2008 at 1:30:55 PM
I agree with much of what you've said, Jerry.... by Alan Williams on Saturday, Nov 22, 2008 at 3:22:23 PM
There is no doubt that media influences public per... by Jerry West on Saturday, Nov 22, 2008 at 4:21:31 PM
You still seem to be clinging to justifications, e... by Alan Williams on Saturday, Nov 22, 2008 at 10:24:09 PM
"You still seem to be clinging to justificati... by Jerry West on Sunday, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:05:00 PM
This may be of interest concerning media bias... by Jerry West on Sunday, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:26:27 PM
You really kinda help to make my case with that, s... by Alan Williams on Sunday, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:41:39 PM
Jerry -- it's not just the Bush administration... by Alan Williams on Sunday, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:25:49 PM
You really kinda help to make my case with that, s... by Jerry West on Sunday, Nov 23, 2008 at 5:06:08 PM