I've been getting appeals for donations from "Bold Progressives" and other groups with names like "Americans for a Free Society" and others with like-sounding names. Basically however, they almost all represent the two corporate political parties, the Democrats and the Republicans, both of which are neither progressive, nor do they support any kind of "freedom".
People tell me that voting is not just a "right" in this nation, but it is also a duty. They tell me that many have died so that I can cast my ballot on the second Tuesday in November. They tell me that it is a sacred responsibility that binds us together as a people. Voting is something that we should all take very seriously and that if you forfeit your right to vote, you are forfeiting your right to speak out on the issues. Like most political issues, this is patently ridiculous.
Voting has become something of fraud in and of itself in the United States. We have become the ones that legitimize the theft of our representative republic by the corporate plutocracy that has taken control of our political system. Reform should have happened long ago, and because it hasn't happened, the powers that control the political system are too well entrenched to hold out any hope of changing the way that politicians are nominated and elected in the USA.
Before any meaningful change can come to the political arenas in this country, Americans must first understand how the system actually operates, and unfortunately, most of us don't have a clue. Many Americans think they understand political realities in this nation, but sadly, they don't. Many people believe that all it takes to get elected in America are a few good ideas and someone that can express those ideas to the people. It would be great if this were true.
The Democrats and Republicans have had such a lock on the political system for so many years, they have virtually eliminated any meaningful form of competition from any other political party.
Sure, there are other political parties out there, but they are there to give the appearance of robust alternatives to the two corporate political organizations, not to actually provide any real choices. How did these two parties manage to accomplish this? What happened to the so-called "checks and balances" that were designed to prevent just such an occurrence?
The last time that any meaningful competition came from outside the Republican or Democratic political camps was the emergence of Ross Perot who ran for President in 1992. Even though he garnered almost 19% of the popular vote in a three way race, he didn't manage to capture any electoral votes. If the United States was a true Democracy (or was based on a Parliamentary system as in Europe), Perot's candidacy would have been a game changer, instead it remains a footnote.
Getting a candidate on a ballot is something that the RNC and the DNC have managed to make virtually impossible. (1)
This is just a brief summary of ballot requirements. The other essentials for a successful bid for elected office, the campaign and the advertising of a candidate are cost prohibitive. When one witnesses the Presidential election on 2008, one can only remember how Former Senator Mike Gravel was shut out the debates by General Electric and then Rep. Dennis Kucinich after him to see how corporate control of the political process was just about total in its control of who received the political exposure that was needed to get elected.
Now we really must look at the "differences" between the Democrats and Republicans. Even if the two parties were diametrically opposed to each other (which they are not), can only two political parties represent all of America's 240 million potential voters? Especially when both parties claim to represent the "center' of the political spectrum and are neither "right" nor "left", just exactly what are the differences? If this were indeed the case, why is it important to vote for either party, especially when they openly declare that they are "middle-of-the-road" political entities? How ridiculous is this really?
It is fairly obvious that the Republicans represent the conservative end of the political reality. This has different meanings to different people. Some say that "conservative" is a description of a "socially conservative" view on things. Others claim that their conservatism is a type of economic conservatism based on less government spending and smaller government as a whole. If this is indeed the case, how do they justify the years of the Bush Administration when government spending went through the roof and eventually led up to the financial breakdown of the financial sector? Well, blaming the entire crisis on the current President is one way of doing it.
The Democrats on the other hand, claim that they are the party of the people and that they are the ones that have had to clean up the mess that Bush and Company left. Obama was elected on his mantra of "change". In reality, nothing much has really changed. In his two years in office he has refused to close Guantanamo, rescind the civil-liberty-killing laws such as The Patriot Act, The military Commissions Act, The John Warner Defense Bill of 2006 (which rescinded Posse Comitatus, the law that prevents using Federal Troops for law Enforcement), torture, extraordinary Rendition of suspected "terrorists" to US client States for questioning using torture, and the refusal to appoint a Special Prosecutor to determine if Cheney or Bush broke the law by torturing suspected "terrorists" or if they had lied to the American people in the run-up to the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The Democrats claim that they have ushered in a new era of health care which turned out to be nothing more than a bail-out of the insurance industry. They can force you to pay for private insurance or face a fine while taxing "Cadillac" health care plans won by the Unions through years of hard bargaining. Meanwhile the wars go on and the military budget has increased over the Bush Administration's years of skyrocketing military expenditures.
Both the Democrats and Republicans for more war and more drone attacks, we remain involved in military actions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan and Yemen. We have bases on every continent and support regimes that use torture. There not many nations that we are not involved in militarily.
Yet I still receive requests for donations. The very organizations that ask for my money are the very ones that support the US plan for military hedgonomy. This time around I won't be supporting any political party, nor will I vote for any one of their candidates. If I should cast my ballot for the lesser of two evils, I would be an accomplice. I refuse to support the wars and the dismantling of my civil liberties.
1 | 2