Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
June 11, 2009 at 08:07:01

Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 6/11/09:

Why Obama is Fighting to Keep the Detainee Abuse Photographs Secret

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Jason Leopold (about the author)     Page 1 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Jason Leopold - Writer

Wednesday, 10 June 2009 08:30 Last Updated on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 14:39 PM

By trying to block the release of photographs depicting US soldiers abusing detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan, President Obama is essentially killing any meaningful chance of opening the door to an investigation or independent inquiry of senior Pentagon officials who were responsible for implementing the policies that directly led to the abuses captured in the images.

And that may very well be his intent.



Of the 12 investigations launched in the aftermath of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, not one scrutinized Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld or any other senior Pentagon or Bush administration official. All of the investigations were, for the most part, limited to the military police officers identified in the photographs.

But earlier this year documents began to surface that helped to explain why.

In February, two crucial pages from an investigation into detainee abuse were finally released. The probe was conducted after the Abu Ghraib photos were revealed

The two pages, which were withheld from the public for five years, describe a pattern of "abusive" behavior by U.S. military interrogators that caused the deaths of two prisoners at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan in December 2002, just two days after former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld authorized the torture of detainees in that country.

The previously secret pages were part of a wide-ranging report into detainee abuse in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay known as the Church Report, named after Vice Admiral Albert T. Church, the former Naval inspector general, who conducted the investigation at the request of Rumsfeld. That 360-page report, delivered to Congress in March 2004, said there was "no policy that condoned or authorized either abuse or torture," which critics of the Bush administration believed was a cover-up.

Indeed, Vice Admiral Church, who conducted the investigation, never bothered to interview Rumsfeld because he did not believe it to be necessary.

A declassified version of Church's report released in March 2004 said the Department of Defense "did not promulgate interrogation policies . . . that directed, sanctioned or encouraged the torture or abuse of detainees."

In a rare display of criticism of the Bush administration, the Washington Post said in a March 13, 2004 editorial that the Church Report was "a blatant example of . . . Whitewashing" aimed at protecting the most senior members of the Bush administration who approved of and implemented torture against suspected terrorists.

"We suspected that these two pages [from the Church Report] related to the deaths of prisoners who were tortured to death was done only to protect the Bush administration from embarrassment and illegal activity, said Amrit Singh, an ACLU attorney, in an interview earlier this year.

Retired Gen. Antonio Taguba, who investigated the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and issued a critical report on the matter, told New Yorker reporter Seymour Hersh in a June 2007 interview that low-level soldiers were not responsible for the abuses depicted in the Abu Ghraib photographs.

"From what I knew, troops just don't take it upon themselves to initiate what they did without any form of knowledge of the higher-ups,"  Taguba said. But Taguba said his mandate was clear. He was only authorized to investigate the military police at Abu Ghraib, and not military officials above them in the chain of command.

"These M.P. troops were not that creative," Taguba said. "Somebody was giving them guidance, but I was legally prevented from further investigation into higher authority. I was limited to a box."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

http://www.pubrecord.org

Jason Leopold is editor of the online investigative news magazine The Public Record, http://www.pubrecord.org, and the author of the National Bestseller, "News Junkie," a memoir. Visit www.newsjunkiebook.com for a preview. He is also a two-time (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "ACLU Afghanistan"
Sinking the Ship of State: The Presidency of George W. Bush
by Walter Brasch

$24.95
Lowest New Price $172.60

Number of pages: 460
Publisher: BookSurge Publishing

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Seeking Justice... by Jason Paz on Thursday, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:58:49 AM
Seek and find by Philip Dennany on Thursday, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:35:32 PM
I suspect that there were some executions by John Hanks on Thursday, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:33:54 PM
Left Afghanistan for a short R&R to Egypt....... by Ernest on Friday, Jun 12, 2009 at 3:04:29 AM
This is a fine piece of reporting, thank you. by William White on Friday, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:30:56 AM
One good appointment by Perry Logan on Friday, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:54:26 AM
Hillary ..... by richard on Friday, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:52:45 PM
Why does anyone surpress evidence? To Protect the guilty. by Patrick Henningsen on Sunday, Jun 14, 2009 at 9:03:57 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum