Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   7 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Why I don't believe Obama is doing all he can to stop the leak

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   News 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 6/2/10

Why isn't our government considering a solution that the Russians have used many times of detonating a small shaped charge (a small nuke) near the site of the spill, whereby the result is a collapse into rubble that seals the leak?

I read in "The Nation" that a Russian general says they have had success with this method on a number of leaks in their own past. It was suggested to the U.S. that we do what the Russians did. So why not consider it? No BP would hate that idea; they still see the dollars available in this junk well. Does anyone know a better solution? I know BPhates any idea that might prevent them fromstill 'saving'the dollars they see as 'available' in this junk well.

BP clearly doesn't know what they are doing and it is in their interest to lie about the extent of the damage. They need to be kicked out of the way now and Obama needs to try anything that might work. The Russian shaped charge, nuke option sounds the most reasonable to me; but then, I'm not an expert in this and so maybe I'm wrong.

I have yet to hear some scientist explain why the Russian option won't work. It isn't even being discussed, as far as I know, at official levels in Washington. Why not consider it if the Russians tried it and it worked for them? Whether they did it at this depth or not, I don't see why the same principles wouldn't be at play as in their plugging of their leaks.

Mr. Obama, either tell us why it won't be tried. Or at least, do something besides rubber stamp BP's decisions and their use of destructive surfactant, Corexit. All the dispersants like this do is reduce the surface tension of the water around the oil it touches?The oil is still there. It just isn't as visible when these surfactants are used. And that's the motivation for using them: BP likes the fact that the damage is unseen.

BP is a marketing company and PR for their own profits is their primary motive. They are a scurvy outfit that does not understand the oil industry and they hire amateurs to cut corners and do the business of the oil business. We can all see that Tony Hayworth is a rank amateur who is only into PR and spin. That's what BP wants: public relations over solutions. That is why these plumes exist and BP is trying to hide them.

It is an outlandish lie that Tony Hayworth again and again gives forth that the plumes cannot be there, and if anything, our do-nothing Attorney General should be filing criminal charges against these executives of BP. But Obama's Administration are corporate shills so they don't prosecute these oil pirates. And the Coast Guard is in cahoots with them. Once again, fat cats get their 'get out of jail free' pass.

Well, this is what you get, Gulf residents: A coast guard that is looking for a high ranking jobs within BP, and BP huckstering everyone while oil is gushing.

Waiting until August for relief wells to be drilled is UNACCEPTABLE. The ecology can't tolerate two more months of oil leak. Andeven BP's latest "solution" risks making the leak bigger with zero guarantee of success.

So, in a few short weeks, the oil tar balls will be getting bigger and every creature that eats it gets sick and dies. Just look at how little biodiversity was around Santa Barbara California when that oil rig leaked.

Tony Hayworth continues to outright lie and lie, and the oil keeps flowing, and flowing, and flowing.

Drill baby drill was and is a crimimal, stupid idea. A little more action, a little less "photo-op-spin-damage-control", Mr. President!

 

I live in the Pacific Northwest and I am interested in current affairs.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Another Example of Associated Press Bias

The Moral Problem of Neocons like Bunning Who Love to Cut Off Poor Peoples' Living

The 'Songbird' as President?

Neo-cons as Heirs of Social Darwinism

The Ron Paul "Surge"

The GOP's Coleman-Franken Obstructionism Needs Democratic Hardball Response

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
You can't state it any plainer. What will Obama do... by Jay Farrington on Wednesday, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:17:09 PM
UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS the Ruskies used an atomic e... by GLloyd Rowsey on Thursday, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:25:50 AM
click hereMakes you wonder. I'm no geologist, but ... by Dick Thomson on Thursday, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:25:25 AM
It makes one wonder if the Oil Rig catastrophe was... by Ginger McClemons on Thursday, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:05:19 PM
ObomBa was brought to office to carry out orders, ... by aberamsay on Thursday, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:11:16 PM
Men are supposed to be the logical ones among us, ... by Lynne Kringler on Thursday, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:49:48 PM
That's just one of the latest ideas being bantered... by Lynne Kringler on Thursday, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:31:16 PM