Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   16 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Does Nato Still Exist?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 6   Well Said 5   Supported 4  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 6/17/14

(image by NATO)

NATO was formed in 1949 because of the threat from the communist bloc, especially the Soviet Union. All of that is ended now. Why, then, has NATO not also ended? The true answer is ugly. Here it is:

All Americans owe a debt of deep gratitude to George Washington, our first leader, who said, in his 1796 Farewell Address as our first President:

"Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor or caprice? It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat it, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them. Taking care always to keep ourselves by suitable establishments on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies. Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand; neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences."

We violate that now in so many ways, all to our harm (though to the great benefit of our aristocracy, who own and control our international corporations). "Granting exclusive favors or preferences" is what our existing international-trade treaties, such as NAFTA, are all about (other than about increasing the profits of U.S. corporations by lowering the wages of U.S. workers by shipping those jobs to lower-wage countries or "hollowing out" the U.S. class-structure into an aristocracy versus impoverished workers who are then further insulted by being forced to pay the taxes to support their own food stamps since the taxes on the aristocrats are going down not up, and the aristocracy thus gets the best of both worlds: lower taxes, and higher profits).

Even worse, President Obama now is trying to extend such trade-favoritism to countries surrounding Russia and China, in a hostile move against them that renews the Cold War against communism -- as if Russia and China were still communist.

And, worst of all, he is even trying to goad Russia into possibly a hot war by bringing its next-door neighbor, Ukraine, into NATO so as to provide the first-strike, surprise-attack, nuclear capability, of annihilating Moscow within only ten minutes of missile-launch -- too little time for Russia to be able to launch its own weapons in retaliation. That's what our coup in Kiev on February 22nd was actually all about -- installing a Ukrainian regime that seeks (and that will be eagerly granted) NATO membership.

So: why does NATO still exist? If it did not exist, then the biggest market for American "defense" contractors would not exist: NATO. It's not really about defense at all.

George Washington thus was wrong about one thing: When he said that European nations were endangering the United States, he was not even imagining a situation in which the threat would be reversed, and when it would instead become the U.S. itself endangering not only Europe, but the entire world. This has now gotten way beyond even George Washington's worst nightmare.

People around the world now consider the United States to be the biggest threat to world peace. They are right.

The U.S. regime can say "Look at the threat from Al Qaeda in Iraq," but before we invaded there in 2003, Al Qaeda was not in Iraq: the dictator there, Saddam Hussein, wouldn't permit them there. We (our aristocracy, that is) brought Al Qaeda into Iraq.

The American people are being lied to, and should go on strike against the lying regime and its aristocracy's "news" media, that have successfully fooled the overwhelming majority of the public inside the country -- though not outside. It's just as bad under Barack Obama as it was under George W. Bush, both of whom represent the nation's aristocracy, not its public. The situation has reached a drastic stage.

NATO must be abolished.

George Washington was right about that.

And the need is now urgent.

And the U.S. must immediately cease and desist and reverse its program of surrounding Russia with nuclear weapons for a first-strike or "nuclear primacy" capability. It is an outrage and a scandal beyond imagining -- and it is not imaginary.

Next Page  1  |  2


The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Editor

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

First Examination of Malaysian MH-17 Cockpit Photo Shows Ukraine Government Shot that Plane Down

Indications that the U.S. Is Planning a Nuclear Attack Against Russia

Harry Reid Effectively Kills Obama's TPP and TTIP International Trade Deals

MH-17 'Investigation': Secret August 8th Agreement Seeps Out

The Propaganda War About Ukraine: How Important It Really Is

Elizabeth Warren Comes Down Hard Against Global Warming, Separates Herself From Hillary Clinton on Climate Change


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Not sure the author ever answered his own question... by Jay Clemons on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:13:10 AM
Every time a new nation joins NATO, it creates a m... by Samson on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:28:24 PM
Absolutely ___ best example, USA-NATO puppet Canad... by urb musak on Friday, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:38:37 PM
Excellent article. The US military occupation of ... by Steve Hudson on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:54:33 AM
I don't know that this evil is all that of the Uni... by Patricia Gray on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:37:36 AM
Well, its the US that's the lead pusher of these a... by Samson on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:35:08 PM
NATO, like the MIC, exists to keep defense contrac... by Scott Baker on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:32:10 AM
Its not entirely correct to say that US powers onl... by Samson on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:32:45 PM
Since the video didn't seem to come through, at le... by Samson on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:38:20 PM
That video is a stunning confirmation of my thesis... by Eric Zuesse on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:56:22 PM
And another thought. If indeed any thought is bei... by Sandra Parson on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:53:00 AM
Perhaps you have helped to explain why Obama is ha... by Eric Zuesse on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:02:46 PM
For the NWO and total control of all by the Bilder... by thepiffler on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:15:50 PM
Huffington Post, which has rejected all of my arti... by Eric Zuesse on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:48:30 PM
You said it all and superbly! ... by thepiffler on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:14:38 PM
An aside... What's with spelling NATO "Nato"? (Is... by John Jonik on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:40:54 PM