Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   7 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Does Limbaugh's Buffonery Get The Attention It Does?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 3/5/12

- Advertisement -

Getty Images

Has there ever been a time in America when certain political views and opinions expressed by public figures were simply ignored by the press, the MSM, the people they were aimed at and therefore the public because they were so inane and nonsensical that highlighting such views and opinions would give them a legitimacy and status they didn't deserve?

More to the point; does everything emanating out of the mouths of political candidates or some blowhard radio commentator "news" and worthy of media attention?

I cite two examples (certainly not limited to these two) lately in the "news" that are this type of inanity, yet grabbed headlines.

First there was Rush Limbaugh accusing one Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University law student of being a "slut", a "prostitute" and "round heeled" (whatever that means) because she testified before a House committee wanting health insurance companies to amend their coverage to cover contraception. Limbaugh intimated that insuring contraception would be a "welfare entitlement" and women getting paid "to have sex" to "avoid unwanted pregnancies and abortions" and as "feminazis" should "post videos on line so we can all watch".

Georgetown's President John DeGioia, was forced to comment defending his student stating, "She provided a model of civil discourse. This expression of conscience was in the tradition of the deepest values we share as people. One need not agree with her substantive position to support her right to respectful free expression", (Georgetown after all is a Catholic Jesuit university and as we all know, the Church opposes contraception).    

Even President Obama felt compelled to call Fluke and defend her saying he has two daughters and that her parents would be proud.

Yet the question begs; why is Limbaugh's inanity "news"? Certainly what he said is slanderous and worthy of being sued as such. And that's a personal decision Fluke has a right to consider. But giving the blowhard Limbaugh and his nonsensical views and opinions front page attention is itself asinine. The man's obviously a sad excuse of a human being who apparently thrives on the attention his crazy comments receive in the media and one guesses the more outrageous they are, the more his listeners get excited as mad dogs drooling.

- Advertisement -

But there it was, Limbaugh and his comments splashed all over the T.V. screens with the talking heads and various politicos palavering over what he said.

Then there's Rick Santorum, Republican presidential contender (pretender) calling President Obama a "snob" for supporting higher education for all Americans. Santorum called colleges and universities "indoctrination mills for godless liberalism". Really; one wonders how it's possible the "Young Republicans" on campuses nationwide still seem to thrive.

Also, there's Santorum's view on the "dangers of contraception", as well as his rejecting John F. Kennedys view on the strict separation of church and state.

From here, is the use of contraception really something most Americans are still talking about in 2012? Or that strict separation of church and state is an issue? Didn't ALL the states ratify the Constitution by the late 1790's? Hasn't Santorum gotten that message yet?

Yet the aforementioned and similar mindless vituperations spouted by public figures makes' the "news" and gets widespread attention in the MSM.

- Advertisement -

It must "sell" to the general American public or why would the MSM give this foolishness, (more suited for the likes of the "National Inquirer" and their ilk) the attention it does?

They say it and we print it, or expound on it endlessly on the tube; simply galling.


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Even the so-called "liberal" wing of the MSM consi... by Ronnie Roberts on Monday, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:13:37 PM
who said these clowns get attention because we giv... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:43:53 PM
it sells soap and roundup and autos and other pois... by Walter J Smith on Monday, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:40:53 PM
"From here, is the use of contraception really som... by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:39:37 PM
I was just thinking about the other day.  Jus... by Susan Rapp on Monday, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:45:44 PM
Limbaugh does thrive on this sort of attention.&nb... by Maxwell on Tuesday, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:27:43 AM
I'll repeat some of what I wrote in the article. G... by Dave Lefcourt on Tuesday, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:53:52 AM