Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 7 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (11 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Can't americans Have Democracy?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 6   Valuable 5   Must Read 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 3/2/12

Become a Fan
  (390 fans)
- Advertisement -

Syria has a secular government as did Iraq prior to the american
invasion. Secular governments are important in Arab lands in which
there is division between Sunni and Shi'ite. Secular governments keep
the divided population from murdering one another.



When the american invasion, a war crime under the Nuremberg standard set
by the US after WWII, overthrew the Saddam Hussein secular government,
the Iraqi Sunnis and Shi'ites went to war against one another. The civil
war between Iraqis saved the american invasion. Nevertheless, enough
Sunnis found time to fight the american occupiers of Iraq that the US
was never able to occupy Bagdad, much less Iraq, no matter how violent
and indiscriminate the US was in the application of force.



The consequence of the US invasion was not democracy and women's rights
in Iraq, much less the destruction of weapons of mass destruction which
did not exist as the weapons inspectors had made perfectly clear
beforehand. The consequence was to transfer political power from Sunnis
to Shi'ites. The Shi'ite version of Islam is the Iranian version. Thus,
Washington's invasion transferred power in Iraq from a secular
government to Shi'ites allied with Iran.



Now Washington intends to repeat its folly in Syria. According to the
american secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, Washington is even
prepared to ally with al-Qaeda in order to overthrow Assad's government.
Now that Washington itself has al-Qaeda connections, will the
government in Washington be arrested under the anti-terrorism laws?



Washington's hostility toward Assad is hypocritical. On February 26, the
Syrian government held a referendum on a new constitution for Syria
that set term limits on future presidents and removed the political
monopoly that the Ba'ath Party has enjoyed.



The Syrian voter turnout was 57.4%, matching the voter turnout for Obama
in 2008. It was a higher voter turnout (despite the armed,
western-supported rebellion in Syria) than in the nine US presidential
elections from 1972 through 2004. The new Syrian constitution was
approved by a vote of 89.4%.



But Washington denounced the democratic referendum and claims that the
Syrian government must be overthrown in order to bring democracy to
Syria.



Washington's allies in the region, unelected oil monarchies such as
Saudi Arabia and Qatar, have issued statements that they are willing to
supply weapons to the Islamist rebels in order to bring
democracy -- something they do not tolerate at home -- to Syria.
- Advertisement -



For Washington "democracy" is a weapon of mass destruction. When
Washington brings "democracy" to a country, it means the country's
destruction, as in Libya and Iraq. It doesn't mean democracy. Libya is
in chaos, a human rights nightmare without an effective government.



Washington installed Nouri al-Maliki as president of Iraq. He lost an
election, but remained in power. He has declared his vice president to
be a terrorist and ordered his arrest and is using the state police to
arrest Sunni politicians. Syria's Assad is more democratic than Iraq's
Maliki.



For a decade Washington has misrepresented its wars of naked aggression
as "bringing democracy and human rights to the Middle East." While
Washington was bringing democracy to the Middle East, Washington was
destroying democracy in the US. Washington has resurrected medieval
torture dungeons and self-incrimination. Washington has destroyed due
process and habeas corpus. At Obama's request, Congress passed
overwhelmingly a law that permits american subjects to be imprisoned
indefinitely without a trial or presentation of evidence. Warrantless
searches and spying, illegal and unconstitutional at the turn of the
21st century, are now routine.



Obama has even asserted the right, for which there is no law on the
books, to murder any american anywhere if the executive branch decides,
without presenting any evidence, that the person is a threat to the US
government. Any american anywhere can be murdered on the basis of
subjective opinion in the executive branch, which increasingly is the
only branch of the US government. The other two "co-equal" branches have
shriveled away under the "war on terror."



Why is Washington so determined to bring democracy to the Middle East
(with the exception of Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, and the Emirates),
Africa, Iran, Afghanistan, Russia, and China, but is hostile to
constitutional rights in america?
- Advertisement -



The rights that americans gained from successful revolution against King
George III in the 18th century have all been taken away by Bush/Obama
in the 21st century. One might think that this would be a news story,
but it isn't.



Don't expect the Ministry of Truth to say anything about it.

 

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/

Dr. Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury for Economic Policy in the Reagan Administration. He was associate editor and columnist with the Wall Street Journal, columnist for Business Week and the Scripps Howard News Service. He is a contributing editor to Gerald Celente's Trends Journal. He has had numerous university appointments. His book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is available here. His latest book,  How America Was Lost, has just been released and can be ordered here.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Libya - The DC/NATO Agenda And The Next Great War

The Road to Armageddon

American Job Loss Is Permanent

A Story...The Last Whistleblower

Pakistan TV Report Contradicts US Claim of Bin Laden's Death

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

deluded to understand that it has been stolen and ... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:10:03 PM
no one understands how a democracy is supposed to ... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:35:02 PM
We have democracy and ignorants rule.... by BFalcon on Saturday, Mar 3, 2012 at 4:07:58 AM
Truth want people to believe.  They love to b... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Saturday, Mar 3, 2012 at 7:59:26 AM
But I tried in vain to convince many ordinary peop... by BFalcon on Saturday, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:18:33 PM
describes our biggest obstacle to change. Most peo... by intotheabyss on Friday, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:55:07 PM
...with every thing said here...in the article and... by Daniel Penisten on Friday, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:10:15 PM