Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
June 28, 2009 at 23:02:11

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 6/28/09:

Who to Trust on a Truth Commission?

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Robert Parry (about the author)     Page 1 of 8 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Robert Parry - Writer

consortiumnews.com (A Special Report)
June 26, 2009

While a truth commission to examine the crimes of the Bush administration has a certain appeal "" especially if there's not going to be a tough special prosecutor bringing criminal charges--there still would be the issue of who could fill the job of getting at the truth.

That's because over the past three decades, the Washington media/political establishment has shown itself stunningly inept at conducting serious inquiries that can penetrate even the most implausible cover stories if a probe's target has influential friends in high places.


Instead, investigations into difficult questions have usually settled for politically convenient half-answers, especially when the Democratic love of bipartisanship confronts Republican anger over holding accountable someone like Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Dick Cheney or George W. Bush.

The key staffing problem is that pretty much all the Wise Men and Wise Women of Washington have seen their reputations thrive in the hot house of intellectual corruption that has dominated the capital for the last 30 years -- and thus they are hopelessly compromised.

Take, for instance, CIA Director Leon Panetta's musings to New Yorker reporter Jane Mayer about a possible truth commission and what could make such a panel acceptable.

"I'm not big on commissions," Panetta told Mayer. "On the other hand, I could see that it might make some sense, frankly, to appoint a high-level commission, with somebody like Sandra Day O'Connor, Lee Hamilton--people like that."

Yet it is because of people like that--retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, a Republican, and former Rep. Lee Hamilton, a Democrat "" that the United States is in the mess it's in today.

Both O'Connor and Hamilton have faced tough political choices in their careers and opted for what was then regarded as the safe path--which it may have been for them although the United States and the world suffered grievously from their failures of courage and foresight.

O'Connor famously twisted legal logic in December 2000 to justify overriding the electoral judgment of the American people nationwide and denying the voters of Florida an honest counting of their ballots to achieve the partisan goal of putting George W. Bush in the White House. [For details, see our book Neck Deep or Consortiumnews.com's "A Time Machine to Save America."]

GOP Go-to Guy

Meanwhile, Hamilton has been the go-to guy for the Republicans whenever they want a Democrat who won't push too hard to shatter a fragile cover-up. He is a master of conducting investigations not in pursuit of truth but in a quest for a politically acceptable solution.

My first dealings with a Hamilton investigation came in August 1986 when he was chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and it fell to him to investigate allegations that I had reported for the Associated Press about White House aide Oliver North providing secret support for the Nicaraguan contra rebels.

Hamilton led a delegation of committee members (including then-Rep. Dick Cheney) down to the White House Situation Room where North and his boss John Poindexter were asked about the allegations. Their emphatic denials were accepted as true, and Hamilton joined with other committee members in agreeing to conduct no deeper investigation.

The bipartisan decision pleased many people in Washington "" though not me and a few others who had worked hard to expose North's clandestine network.

Thanks to Hamilton, North and his team almost escaped unharmed, except that one of their last supply planes was shot down over Nicaragua on Oct. 5, 1986, and one survivor, Eugene Hasenfus, pointed the finger at the White House and especially the office of Vice President Bush. A month later, the Iran arms sales side of the Iran-Contra scandal surfaced in a Lebanese newspaper.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

 

http://www.consortiumnews.com

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Democrat Evidence International"
The So-called Evidence is a Farce: US Foreign Policies Before and After 11 September
by Stan Goff


Number of pages: 28
Publisher: Democrat Publications

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Truth Commission by Sister Begonia on Monday, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:08:30 AM
Truth Omission by Maxwell on Monday, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:10:22 AM
I'm sorry to say that this article, for the subject by Nick van Nes on Monday, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:53:23 AM
Nick van Nes by Ethan Allen on Monday, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:16:32 PM
Yes, by Maxwell on Tuesday, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:55:09 AM
The Truth Commission by tjb on Monday, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:01:46 AM
And, there is more...... by Ethan Allen on Monday, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:28:54 PM
Also noteworthy: by Maxwell on Wednesday, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:41:00 AM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum