Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! 1 Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   No comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Who is compromising "South Stream" in Europe?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

The third and fourth sections of Russia's "South Stream" will be completed by 2018. However, supranational structures in Brussels and their representatives in Berlin still cannot set forth a predictable and unified position on this project of undisputed geopolitical importance.   Bureaucratic hurdles like "Third Energy Package" or even more mysterious "Southern Gas Corridor" create non-competitive and non-transparent advantage to the EU initiatives on the energy market. "We will not impose any unreasonable or unjustified level of administrative or regulatory requirements. We will act as fair partners", promised EU Energy Commissioner Guenther Oettinger in May, 2011. Two years after this speech one can clearly see quite an opposite situation.

"Third Energy Package" is a direct attempt to implement retroactive legislation thus driving down natural-gas prices. It is absolutely inconsistent with the principles on which the whole European legal framework is based. Another notorious example of arbitrary behavior on the part of the European Commission is its indirect support to the alleged "virtual" reverse-gas supplies from Poland to the Ukraine. There is every reason to believe that this natural gas is Russian. One can hardly call it fair play (any partner would consider such actions fraudulent), but after the Cyprus affair it is very hard to predict how far the EU can go in denying market realities.

On a long-term horizon this strategy may harm German national interests as a major natural-gas importer and create unnecessary credibility gap between Russia and the European Union. Germany needs to get over its love/hate relationship with "South Stream" and return to thinking in terms of realpolitik. After all, it's just a pipeline, not some virtual Doctor Faust's contract as some analysts with Atlantic orientation often assume. European double-game seems especially illogical if we consider the scope of economic problems that Merkel and Oettinger have to solve in their own backyard. Global natural-gas demand growth should be treated as an opportunity, not a "threat".


by South Stream AG

             Image Source: http://www.south-stream.info/

The European leaders are very well aware of "Nabucco West" and "TAP" project limitations (lack of solid resource base and insufficient infrastructure to name a few). These pipelines may contribute to the diversification of supplies although even if completed they cannot be a game-changer. Recent talks of Azerbaijan's President Ilham Aliev in Austria have shown that "OMV" and other key European shareholders prioritize "Nabucco-West" over other pipeline blueprints. Unfortunately "South Stream" remains on the periphery of European energy policy, despite the fact that it is a very advanced project. In comparison, "Nabucco West" is yet to meet environmental goals and objectives in Romania. Nabucco Gas Pipeline International, the consortium to develop, build, and operate the "Nabucco West" pipeline, has spent less than 5% of the total value of the investment on the development of the project.

- Advertisement -

There are clear differences of opinion among the EU regulators. EU Energy Directorate's wavering position on "South Stream" sends contradictory signals to the non-EU transit states. Serbia, for instance, has officially announced it is ready to start building its section of the South Stream pipeline. "All problems are solved", announced "Srbijagas" Director-General Dusan Bajatovic. At the same time "Nabucco" and "Southern Gas Corridor" lobbyist Zorana Mihajlović (Serbian Minister of Energy and Washington-backed ISAC Fund zealot) has recently been very active in her meaningless crusade against Russia's "South Stream". Many experts also remember her "brave" attempt to change the final draft of agreement between Gazprom and Srbijagas not that long ago. Although an old Serbian proverb says: you can't have both goatling and money. Politically motivated red tape will not undermine Serbia's energy self-sufficiency on the Balkans.

In April 2013, Prime Minister of Slovenia Alenka Bratusek confirmed that Russia's gas pipeline remains a priority for her country, which pursues economic development and foreign investments. Slovenia's investments in the project will total some 1.1 billion euros ($1.4 billion). Bulgaria has also expressed its deep interest in Russia's pipeline. A look on the map of the Southern Europe reveals that political contradictions in Belgrade will cause nothing but a short delay in "South Stream" realization. Hardly the same could be said about "Nabucco".

- Advertisement -

 

Russian web journalist and researcher in the fields of global economy and energy policy. Route Magazine (routemag.com) editor and columnist.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Gas Exporting Countries to Gather in Moscow for Influential Forum

Geopolitical and economic impacts of ESPO-2 pipeline

Nuclear Industry Re-Energizing after Fukushima

Eurocrats have ruined Cyprus's economy: who's next?

Russia Draws Up Business Plan To Revive The Northern Sea Route

South Stream Shapes European Energy Security, Nabucco Falls Behind

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments