Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (8 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   25 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Who does the US Chamber work for?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   News 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 10/12/10

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)

Recent unsettling revelations would indicate that, more and more, the US Chamber of Commerce is working for foreign nationals and corporations. Big business has been sending American jobs to other nations for a long time. Our current Congress has tried several measures to stop the bleeding and to bring some of those jobs back to Americans.

Despite vigorous opposition from the right, Congress was able to remove a few of the tax breaks and incentives multi-national corporations used to fund the exportation of our jobs. Another bill proposed by Democrats would try to increase incentives to bring some of those lost jobs back to American citizens who need them. After ten years the tax breaks for the rich have not saved our jobs either. That extra "pocket change" for billionaires cost the taxpayers billions in deficits while it was invested over seas. (Bloomberg Magazine's poll of investors revealed that 33% favored China and Brazil, 31% favored India while only 24% favored investing in the US.)

The US Chamber opposes these measures and is set to spend $75 million dollars of "secret donations" to support both US and foreign companies who do not want to restore jobs to America. It is a federal crime for a foreign interest to influence our elections yet thanks to a recent conservative Supreme Court decision, corporations are now "persons" who can spend unlimited funds to influence our elections without disclosing who they are. Democrats want to require disclosure of those sources but the GOP blocked that as well. So much for their transparency pledge.

Multi-national corporations based in the US saw an increase in profits of nearly 43% even as the average American was losing jobs at the rate of 750,000 per month in 2008 at the height of the Bush recession.

The US Chamber has been escalating its recruitment of foreign corporations and foreign capitol to fund attacks against policies and candidates who's aim is to restore America to its former glory as an industrial nation. One might ask why the chamber would spend millions to defeat US jobs but the fact is that the chamber is deep in the pockets of super-rich corporations who now earn nearly 2/3 of their profits outside of the United States. To them the US's tiny 300 million people is an insignificant market compared to nearly 3 billion inhabitants of China and India. The best financial interest of those corporations outweighs the needs of our own nation, thus the rampant attack ads that serve only the profit interests of companies who will not be providing new jobs at home any time soon...if at all.

While the Democrats are not innocent in this exodus of jobs, at least they are trying to fix some of these wounds. We can't abandon that in the middle and go back to the same people who are spending billions to send even more of our jobs away to other nations. We need to stand up to financial bullies like the US Chamber and vote for our own self interest as middle class working Americans. Show them the cost of throwing away that $75 million dollars by ignoring their attacks and tuning to another channel. They do not have your best interest at heart.

I would also call on all local chambers including our own local chamber, of which I am a member, to sever all ties with the US Chamber. Stop taking our members money to be used to attack the preservation of our own jobs. The US Chamber does not support small local business.

Additional notes:

I believe someone needs to file an Immediate suit to seek an injunction against these Chamber Ads. The Chamber has directly sent "action alerts" to foreign companies related to our elections and politics. Since it is illegal for foreigners to contribute to ads to influence our elections one has to wonder why these "alerts" would be sent.

Obviously they want those donations. The Chamber claims it keeps the money separate via some "mystery" system but even if that can be proven, the act of soliciting and then buying ads in support of what may be ads favoring foreign corporations would, at the least, amount to money laundering. Collecting funds from someone who is legally barred to interfere with US elections yet offsetting the operating costs of an organization buying those very ads in their behalf with US donated funds...that smells like a RICO violation to me.

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Block US Chamber today.

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.joethevoter.org

Political Activism is a passion but I have earned a living since 1995 through my web page design and hosting business. I also do graphics design and offer business cards, fliers, brochures etc. My most recent venture which can be seen at (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Conspiracy Too Big for Glenn Beck

Religion & Using fear to control "White" America.

Who does the US Chamber work for?

Deciphered: The Secret Republican Agenda

Corporate American's Grand Design for the Middle Class

Will November spell the end of our Democracy?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 25 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Some one needs to file a suit ASAP to bring these ... by Paul Kruger on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:36:22 AM
I am a little surprised you're still pimping this ... by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:04:39 PM
For starters even one dollar of foreign money is i... by Paul Kruger on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:16:25 PM
"For starters even one dollar of foreign money is ... by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:46:21 PM
"For starters even one dollar of foreign money is ... by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:48:16 PM
The [U.S.] subsidiary...This is not related to the... by Paul Kruger on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:09:10 PM
I still prefer to support more jobs for Americans ... by Paul Kruger on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:10:49 PM
"This is not related to the US Chamber which is no... by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:29:11 PM
"If we want to cast aspersions here, then let's as... by Paul Kruger on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:51:25 PM
"I am not concerned with personal donations becaus... by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:11:18 PM
I am happy to be in agreement with him. He is rig... by Paul Kruger on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:41:49 PM
DAVID AXELROD (overlapping): Well, I don't know. ... by Paul Kruger on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:07:53 PM
"You did not even read the very interview you post... by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:45:19 PM
" The Tillman Act of 1907 prohibited foreign nati... by Paul Kruger on Wednesday, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:54:05 AM
"Because prior to the Citizens United decision the... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:51:21 PM
This is something so dangerous to our democracy I ... by Paul Kruger on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:23:59 PM
Your original article presents so well ;-) Your Co... by Michael Rose on Wednesday, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:55:35 AM
Some people insist on making things difficult by o... by Paul Kruger on Wednesday, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:06:25 AM
Murphy's Bankster backsters are all Named mugshots... by Michael Rose on Wednesday, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:27:44 AM
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha *gasp*... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:54:19 PM
"My article never indicated that this was a partis... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:53:02 PM
Are you my new, special friend (a/k/a handler)? As... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:35:00 PM
... by Paul Kruger on Tuesday, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:09:30 PM
Paul, thanks for highighting the important role of... by Peter Duveen on Wednesday, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:37:33 AM
So... why didn't Obama campaign in 2008 on the "fu... by Tom Murphy on Monday, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:27:03 AM