Who Among the Candidates Will Speak for the Dead of 9/11?
Cynthia McKinney, who knows exactly what happened on 9/11, is mum on this subject as she runs for the presidency on the Green Party ticket.
Ralph Nader knows what happened on 9/11, but even this most courageous of candidates is refusing to discuss it. I deeply admire him, but he ultimately has let us down.
The Libertarian Party chooses to ignore 9/11, an event that was clearly anathema to their political views. This seems odd to me. After all, 3,000 souls were definitely deprived of their liberty for political gain. That seems anti-libertarian to me.
The various socialist parties have also chosen to ignore 9/11, thusly demonstrating how far from being radical they really are. (Keep in mind the meaning of 'radical', which suggests going to the roots of an issue, as opposed to focusing on what has grown from those roots.)
The Constitution Party, which is Pat Buchanan's favored vehicle, ironically accepts the amending of state constitutions to ban marriage contracts between gays or between lesbians, thusly indicating the Constitution Party does not have even a minimal understanding of what is the fundamental purpose of the national and state constitutions, which is to protect minorities from being discriminated against by tyrannical majorities. Pat's party also chooses to ignore 9/11, thusly suggesting they don't see massively bloody false flag ops by the White House as a constitutional issue. Now ain't that just a wee bit odd?
I have finally decided I will not vote. There is no party or candidate for whom I can offer even a symbolic vote. It is often parroted by shallow thinkers that not voting is a form of voting for the greater of two evils. Haw! If not one single candidate is even asking for a broad and deep independent study of 9/11, then I ask which candidate would be the lesser of the current ovine herd of worthless cowards?
There simply is no issue as basic as 9/11. Everything bad that has happened to this nation since that date has in one way or another depended on that massacre. The absolute silence of the existing political candidates regarding 9/11 makes every candidate a de facto partner in the ongoing coverup of the worst single crime ever perpetrated in American history.
I hereby devoutly wish for a plague on all their houses. I think I'll pour myself a large glass of cheap brandy and watch a dirty movie on election day. I'll feel much cleaner that way than if I were to vote for any of the assorted slate of cowards.
I am told we can never effect deep changes in the system with my attitude. I say we can never effect deep changes without my attitude. So there. Those who make such foolish judgments can put that in their pipes and smoke it.
(Of course, I've chosen for heuristic reasons to exclude consideration of the known fact that the coming elections will be fixed. Take note that Jack McCafferty, a national TV news commentator for CNN, has also expressed his deep concerns over the honesty of the coming elections. For that alone, he deserves the Croix de Guerre.)
... is a death sentence for politicians at this point. Hell, even Ron Paul knew that. It gives the opposition an opportunity to paint you as 1. unamerican 2. a crackpot 3. "in league with the terrorists".
Now, I know that the official myth of 9/11 is BS.
19 cave-dwellers beat the most extensive air defense system in the world?
They hit the Pentagon 1 hour and 20 minutes after the first hijacking and NORAD changed the story 3 times about how they let that happen when jets were less than 10 minutes away?
The first time in history that steel framed buildings collapsed due to fire, and it happened three times on the same day, all owned by the same guy, just 6 weeks after he signed the insurance deal?
Then it took the president 400+ days to agree to an investigation, and he tries to put Kissenger in charge?
Come on people... how stupid do they think Americans are, anyway?
But, the reality is, until we force the MSM to start doing what investigative journalists are supposed to do in a free democracy, the majority of the people out there just aren't going to listen.
Hell, mentioned Building 7 to some people the other day and they thought I was talking about Area 51 or something. They had never even heard of it, much less seen it drop into it's own footprint at freefall speed.
So no. Politicians can read the polls and they have a 6th sense for what the public will listen to and what they won't. I agree with the author of this piece; that is no explination for the families of the dead murdered that day by someone other than OBL. I agree.
Rome wasn't built in a day. new investigations are continueing. Steven Jones is still working hard and has even been peer reviewed and published. And we are looking at new investigative lines, as we speak). Just check out 9/11 Blogger and look for my blog there. Something big may be in the making with Professor Jones to further his work in proving the controled demolition of the WTC.
by
scott creighton (21 articles, 9 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 170 comments)
on Monday, June 2, 2008 at 3:59:01 PM
Anything that insinuates "conspiracy" will never be discussed in the mainstream. The illusion that everything is really OK must be protected at all costs. That leaves out of discussion every important topic that has been kept from all of us since we were first able to start thinking for ourselves - 2nd Grade!
You think 9-11 is important? It's just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.
by
Bill Cain (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 270 comments)
on Tuesday, June 3, 2008 at 1:42:35 PM
