Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 5 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (8 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   24 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Who Is So Hell-Bent On Getting Assange?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 7   Well Said 5   Supported 5  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 7/7/12

Become a Fan
  (7 fans)
- Advertisement -

Julian Assange Being Silenced by Time Magazine

Julian Assange is not a US citizen, and yet some influential Americans are calling him a "traitor" and trying to pin "espionage" on him. WikiLeaks has published information about virtually all the major governments and corporations around the world, and yet he's portrayed as specifically "Anti-American," without a shred of proof to that effect. He's a publisher, yet they insist on calling him a whistleblower. He's an eloquent advocate for transparency in government, and yet they call him a terrorist. Even though his (carefully redacted) WikiLeaks releases haven't seriously harmed any of the wrong-doers they exposed (sort of makes you wonder why, doesn't it?), he's nevertheless accused of having blood on his hands! So why is America so dead set against him? Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

Hell Hath No Fury...

And as if all that wasn't enough, Assange has been accused by two one-night-stand lovers (furious, once they found out about each other) of having unprotected sex with them. This, in the media's eyes is enough to decry him as a "sex offender" and occasionally even - get this - gay!. Because that's what gay people do - have sex with multiple partners of the opposite sex. Hence the gaiety.

And yet, he's not been charged with any crime - sexual or otherwise - and is, ostensibly, "only" wanted for questioning. He immediately agreed to the questioning. In the UK. But they ignored that request. When he previously showed up for questioning - in Sweden - they released him without charge, dismissing the case as meritless.

But that was then. Soon afterwards they wanted to question him so badly they even issued a European Arrest Warrant for him, and placed him under arrest which has been going on for well over 500 days. No trial, no discussion, just brute force and endless hypocrisy. Still think Assange's persecution is not politically motivated? Wanna buy a bridge?

Meanwhile prominent pundits and even politicians in the US call for his... assassination! Kinda makes you wonder, doesn't it?   And for all of Assange's trials and tribulations, the mainstream media - who have previously been only too happy to publish the scoops his organization unearthed, happily taking credit for the real journalism which wasn't of their doing - now pile onto him a daily dose of slurs and accusations which would make even Osama bin Laden blush, deep under water where he's said to have found his new home.

None of the above adds up. Someone's got it in for Assange, and it's got nothing whatsoever to do with the law. Not a goddamned thing. But who?

Red-Handed But Not Red-Faced

Even the most brainwashed among the American and the international public, if given but a cursory outline of all the known facts, might struggle to understand the manic fervor with which Assange is being persecuted. Could it really be that the US wants to punish him so badly for merely publishing low-level secrets which he didn't steal, and which - as has already been demonstrated - haven't caused even a tiny fraction of the mayhem and bloodshed they were supposed to have unleashed?

- Advertisement -

Unlike Bradly Manning, who is at least a US citizen and in whose case the US may, arguably, have valid legal arguments for prosecuting him (though not torturing and persecuting, as they have done), Julian Assange should be totally in the clear. He's only exercised his right of freedom of speech in a Free World. He's certainly not abused that freedom, but rather has done everyone a Nobel-Prize-worthy favor. Quite unlike some other Nobel Prize winners I could mention.

These mysterious forces within the US government and shadow government (and not only in the US) cry foul through their media mouthpieces, when caught red-handed - and everyone instead of focusing on their crimes, is slinging mud at the one person who has given everyone the one verifiable glimpse of what they really are! They didn't even blush!

So, no. Such a level of vitriol against the man is not explained by any law I'm familiar with, and certainly not by the spirit of the law, particularly that of the US. Used to be whistleblowers helped keep organizations honest. Well, enough of that. Now it's the whistleblowers who must be afraid.

But there's more to all this than just scaring whistleblowers away. So could it be that these vicious attacks are sponsored by "some" people in the government, media and corporatocracy and their intent to scare whistleblowers from coming forward? People with quite a bit to lose if they're exposed? Yes. This is much closer to the truth.

Mere Piranhas But Not Quite Sharks

Surely, it's not just those crooked pundits nor even those blood-thirsty politicians calling for his assassination who are solely to blame. Certainly not the Canadian political "scientist" Tom Flannagan, whose incitement to murder was, arguably, but a humorous preamble. Or Weekly Standard's multi-millionaire Bill Kristol's patriotism which would like to make an example of Assange as well. Or another millionairess Sarah Palin who earned her every penny fair and square just like you or I can. Or Fox News analyst K.T. McFarland, or Rep. Mike Rogers - and quite a few others. Incidentally, all these multi-millionaires have arrived at their wealth rapidly and, to an inquiring mind, somewhat inexplicably.

- Advertisement -

But the piranha list doesn't end there. It gets bigger and more exclusive still. Take Diane Feinstein, the uninspiring a caricature of a politician that she is. Or Sen. Joe Lieberman who could be a morbid comedian if he weren't so grotesque. Or Hillary Clinton who stopped only barely short of calling for his murder. So we have all these individuals whose, frankly, inexplicable wealth growth is in itself at least cause for raised eyebrows, all ganging up on this dirt-poor publisher!

Diane Feinstein's net worth in 2010 was just over $93 million and has, reportedly nearly doubled by now (you've got to admire her talent!); Joe Lieberman had "only" just over $3 million in 2010 but is, reportedly going to bust through $10 million this year (way to go Joe! No wonder you're so ambitious).

Most of the other accusers are in the same league, averaging around $13 million for a senator and around $4.5 million for a representative. (And in case you wondered, Barack Obama's net worth is reported to be around $20,000,000 now - up from a a paltry few hundred thousand before he got elected pres. Nice one!).

Next Page  1  |  2


Paul Sedkowski, co-founder of Meer Music International and co-creator of Fame Games, has spent most of his life in music. He's worked with platinum-selling managers, producers, artists and songwriters. From long-term partnerships with John Coletta (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Solution for Correa, Assange and Justice For Us All

Who Is So Hell-Bent On Getting Assange?

The March of the Sycophants - How Do You Un-Inspire Them?

When The Fairy Tale Ends in a Joke

Passive Agents Of Disinformation

What is Your Favorite Candidate's Political Vision?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 24 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

My take on the real reasons behind Assange's perse... by Paul Sedkowski on Saturday, Jul 7, 2012 at 3:16:25 AM
Since about 1990, I have had a terrible suspicion ... by Paul Repstock on Saturday, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:27:53 PM
I've been wondering about all the extremism with r... by Laura Krier on Saturday, Jul 7, 2012 at 8:24:47 AM
Perceptive insights indeed, Paul... posing some fa... by Michael Rose on Saturday, Jul 7, 2012 at 9:15:15 AM
I'm pretty speechless. But it makes perfect sense.... by Paul Sedkowski on Saturday, Jul 7, 2012 at 11:53:09 AM
in the last paragraph? You've written a cliff-hang... by Daniel Geery on Saturday, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:25:28 PM
If that's what you mean, then it's a 1hr 54m doc -... by Paul Sedkowski on Saturday, Jul 7, 2012 at 4:01:37 PM
time on this rather long video? I'd like to see th... by Daniel Geery on Saturday, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:23:36 PM
ETA = ETD +0143 hrsIt's not that the video risks b... by Michael Rose on Saturday, Jul 7, 2012 at 4:53:37 PM
Dean has written many article about 911. This is j... by Stephen Zimmett on Saturday, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:13:42 PM
I agree that the American public have not been tol... by Carol Davidek-Waller on Saturday, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:38:54 PM
"it is a giant leap (with no net) from a casual st... by Michael Rose on Saturday, Jul 7, 2012 at 9:35:13 PM
Nobody has more eloquently and comprehensively pos... by Michael Rose on Sunday, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:11:16 AM
But is it really bigger than any of the other leap... by Paul Sedkowski on Sunday, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:16:54 AM
Paul, maybe not all OEN readers can translate your... by Michael Rose on Sunday, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:43:41 AM
I have little doubt that it's not the "entire" US ... by Paul Sedkowski on Sunday, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:43:47 PM
I sure would like to know who are the suspects.... by Archie on Sunday, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:31:24 AM
...and this suspect is so high up in government yo... by Michael Rose on Sunday, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:47:15 AM
Michael Rose suggested this video as an illus... by Paul Sedkowski on Sunday, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:20:22 AM
Enter a search for, "The Power of Nightmares".... by Paul Repstock on Sunday, Jul 8, 2012 at 9:02:25 AM
We could add "The Power of One" .... but let's bri... by Michael Rose on Sunday, Jul 8, 2012 at 2:02:10 PM
The redoubtable Stephen Lendman pitches yet more c... by Michael Rose on Sunday, Jul 8, 2012 at 2:53:30 PM
It can at last be revealed here on OEN: Jul... by Michael Rose on Sunday, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:19:43 PM
What is going on is an 'Inqisition' as Michel... by Davey Jones on Sunday, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:12:09 AM