59 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Closing Obama's Pandora's Box

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   2 comments
Message James Nimmo

 

(OKLAHOMA CITY)  Funny, isn't it, how politicians can talk on and on about almost any topic, except when it comes to the civil rights of America's gay and lesbian taxpayers, especially when it the topic is same-gender marriage. 

Funny, too, is the ability that Obama has to distance himself from his roots the higher he went up the political food chain. He claims to be "evolving" in his opinion of same-gender marriage yet this Chicago activist questionnaire from 1996 shows a clear case of DE-volution as Obama's career advanced.

http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/gay/lesbian/news/photospreadthumbs.php?APUB=wct&ADATE=2009-01-14&AGALLERY=obama


Our rights are held hostage by the un-holy alliance between religion and civil law.

Our inherent birth rights are ours throughout our lives and not an optional feel-good action to be granted or withheld at the discretion of a political poo-bah when he/she thinks it will pull votes from one demographic or another.

Our civil rights are not a red flag to wave at rabid fundamentalist believers who are as sheep-like as their leaders are adept at herding.

Our rights are the same as those enjoyed by the rest of America's population and our gender attraction should be irrelevant to that recognition.

 
I would suggest that Obama, through his mouthpiece Gibbs, is wrestling with his religious views when he can't seem to give a, pardon the pun, straight answer about same-gender marriage. 

Obama speaks of the "traditional" image of marriage as being between one man and one woman, but that "tradition" also meant the couple were of the same skin color, unlike his own parents.   Wasn't the traditional image of an American president that of a white man?  Wasn't the traditional image of the Speaker of the House that of a white man?  Wasn't the image of a state governor that of a white man?
 
But on second thought, Obama IS giving a straight answer, that is a straight answer rooted in the ignorance of his upbringing and failure to move with the reasonable information that proves we gays and lesbians are productive taxpaying citizens.  

Our president has sworn to uphold the Constitution that includes the 14th Amendment
 ( http://tinyurl.com/y9lp75a which covers my civil rights as a native born citizen as well as the First Amendment's clear separation of church and state ( http://tinyurl.com/6as4v ) .

If this man, who was touted as a constitutional scholar during his first campaign for president, can equivocate on my rights as a citizen, I will certainly use my vote in 2012 in a way that clearly denies him a second term.

Here's a you-tube clip of the attempt by spokesperson Gibbs to call off questioning about Obama's intentions concerning gay/lesbian equality.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kT2KMjTRHsE    

clip --  But Obama's position since has been that marriage should be reserved for one man and one woman. Still, the president has suggested his position could "evolve" on the matter and said last month he's "wrestling" with the idea of marriage rights for gay couples.

"Like a lot of people, I'm wrestling with this," Obama said in an interview last month with The Advocate . "I've wrestled with the fact that marriage traditionally has had a different connotation. But I also have a lot of very close friends who are married gay or lesbian couples."


http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/24/gibbs-nearly-ends-news-conference-over-marriage-questions/

http://tinyurl.com/4oml7zg

Thanks to Rex Wockner, indie journalist, for the links.    
Rate It | View Ratings

James Nimmo Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

James Nimmo is active in progressive issues and believes no one should be denied their equality because of the accidents of birth and circumstances.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Hall-la-lou-lou-ing for Oklahoma's Senator Tom Coburn: Congress's Worst Person?

Oklahoma's Bigot-in-Chief has Learned Nothing in 10 years

How to Spell Equality? I before E except after C. L before G except Before B?

Catholic Church Expanding Beyond Roe v. Wade

Homo-Hater's Hubby Gets Outed in Phone Call

Forced Off the Edge of Life's Road

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend