Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 6 (8 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   11 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

When Research Meets Conventional Wisdom; Non-violent Response More Effective Than Armed Response

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Inspiring 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com


Nonviolent resistance is more than twice as successful as armed struggle, even in the face of brutal regime repression.  That's what two social scientists found when they examined 323 violent and nonviolent uprisings from around the world between the years 1900 and 2006.

               This is detailed in Why Civil Resistance Works: the Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. Its authors are Erica Chenoweth, assistant professor of international studies at the University of Denver, and Maria J. Stephan, a strategic planner in the U.S. State Department.  

               The authors also found that nations experiencing nonviolent uprisings were much more likely to emerge as democratic societies and with a lower risk of civil war relapse than nations undergoing violent insurgencies.

               Their book has been named a 2012 Woodrow Wilson Foundation Award winner. This is a scholarly work and other scholars are, without question, its first intended audience.  The message is clearly accessible to any reader, however, and for people with an interest in the power of nonviolence to effect change, it is an important message indeed.  

The authors evidence no concern over whether peaceful protest is morally or spiritually superior to armed revolt.  Their question is practical.  Does it work better than violence?  Their answer, bolstered by careful statistical analysis, is yes.  

A main reason why nonviolent protest is superior, they found, is because nonviolent campaigns have a decided "participation advantage" over military struggle.  They tend to be about four times larger.  Because of the mixture of resistance tactics available to nonviolent movements--ranging from protests, sit-ins, and occupations to stay-at-home and go-slow demonstrations, boycotts, and strikes--they attract a broader following than armed rebellion.  Success tends to stem from using a variety of tactics to weaken a regime's "pillars of support" and finally make the status quo untenable.
The authors looked at the success rates of the toughest types of insurrections: anti-dictator, self-determination and anti-occupation movements. Their cases range from the famed Indian Independence movement of the 1930s and "40s to the Serbian movement to overthrow Slobodan Milosevic in 2000, among many others.  

Of course, not all nonviolent campaigns succeed.  Tiananmen Square in China is an example.  There, insurgents relied too heavily on protests and demonstrations rather than a diversity of methods.  The authors look in depth at another failure: the Burmese Uprising of 1988-90.   Poorly managed campaigns can fall short.

They note that armed revolt does occasionally work but at a much lower success rate than nonviolent campaigns.  And the cost is high.  The Russian, Chinese, Algerian, Cuban and Vietnamese revolutions--the best-known examples of successful armed revolt in the 20th century--each produced harsh results.  None of those countries emerged democratic.  

In addition to its statistical analysis of 323 uprisings, the book features four case studies: the Iranian Revolution of 1977-79, the First Palestinian Intifada of 1987-92 (nonviolent at the start and partially successful until succumbing to factionalism and violence), the Philippine People Power Movement of 1983-86, and the Burmese Uprising.

The overall results of their work were an admitted surprise to Chenoweth, a scholar of political violence.  And they clearly fly in the face of much conventional wisdom.  Perhaps that's why the authors spend considerable time anticipating arguments from those who would dispute their findings and then refuting them.  

Like all scholarly efforts, Why Civil Resistance Works is full of citations of previous research.  For those who understand the workings of regression analysis, all of the statistical investigation is there.  Fear not, however.  You don't need to be a social scientist to read this book.  The charts and graphs are clear and helpful.  The text is, for the most part, quite accessible, if sometimes a bit repetitive.  

This book is useful to anyone who values nonviolence in public policy.  It's good news for those who feel lonely in a world that seems to accept without question the notion that violence, or the threat of it, is always the practical way to solve problems.   
 
ABOUT THE BOOK
Title: Why Civil Resistance Works: the Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict.  Authors: Erica Chenoweth and Maria J. Stephan.  List price: $29.50.  Pages: 320.  Publisher: Columbia University Press, 2011, New York.
What others say: "This is social science at its best. Years of critical study culminate in a book on one dominating issue: how does nonviolent opposition compare with violence in removing a regime or achieving secession? The authors study successes and failures and alternative diagnoses of success and failure, reaching a balanced judgment meriting careful study.  -- Thomas C. Schelling, Harvard University, recipient of the Nobel Prize in economics.

 

Dick Jones is a semi-retired public relations executive from Pennsylvania.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

When Research Meets Conventional Wisdom; Non-violent Response More Effective Than Armed Response

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Erica Chenoweth is a scholar of political violence... by Dick Jones on Thursday, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:20:21 PM
Throughout history, people who have tried violent ... by Paul Roden on Thursday, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:54:41 PM
For those hoping the new year will bring a new 'we... by R. A. Landbeck on Thursday, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:22:14 PM
But I am not sure that they completely eliminated ... by BFalcon on Friday, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:10:24 AM
This may be properly addressed in the book, or it ... by Richard Pietrasz on Friday, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:29:31 PM
 Some also give importance to the deal that t... by BFalcon on Friday, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:01:34 PM
Disobeying the authorities while at the same time ... by Arend Rietkerk on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:37:47 AM
Chenoweth and Stephan found that 88 percent of all... by Dick Jones on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:13:56 AM
In the 20th century, most of those movements that ... by Rico D. on Saturday, Jan 5, 2013 at 6:59:51 AM
Ultimately, collectively we may need to challenge ... by Rico D. on Saturday, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:04:56 AM
A truly "Non-Violent" revolution would involve con... by Rico D. on Saturday, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:22:54 AM