Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 14 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 16 (30 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   21 comments

Sci Tech

Orifice Politics; What the War on Women is Really About

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Supported 6   Must Read 5   Well Said 5  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 3/24/12

- Advertisement -

After weeks of pondering what the "war on women" is really about, I've finally had an epiphany.

It never seemed sufficient to me that laws mandating women's bodies be medically invaded, having their access to contraception curtailed, or abrogating the constitutional right to abortion was just about women. The phrase itself -- "war on women" -- seemed to trivialize what was actually happening. Surely, I thought, this has to be about something bigger.   

And then came my Aha! Moment. This isn't only a war on women! That so-called war is simply part of a full-scale aggressive action aimed at President Obama and those of us who, like him, believe in a more socially responsive, responsible, and forward-thinking America. It's an attack on liberal ideology and an attempt to defeat the left, no matter what.

What fueled my Aha! Moment was recalling something important about human history: Ever since nomadic and agrarian societies yielded to land ownership, men have warred over territory and everything on it, including women. Thus women have suffered male aggression in various forms, including sexual assault, always in the name of "winning."   The rape and pillage in history books and romance novels became commonplace once one group of male warriors wanted what their perceived enemy owned or controlled.

In today's political wars, conflict is not only about the power and prestige one group has or is at risk of losing; it's also about what an oppositional group values and how fiercely committed that group is to destroying its "enemy."

It's worth noting at this point that aggression is often sexual, especially male aggression when women are present. As feminist writer Susan Brownmiller has noted, "War provides men with the perfect psychological backdrop to give vent to their contempt for women."   The "spiritual bonding of men at arms," she says, "confirms for men what they long suspect -- that women are peripheral to the world that counts."   Rape, she adds, "accompanies territorial advance by the winning side in land conflicts as one of the spoils of war."   In the context of the current Right/Left conflict it could be argued, reasonably I would argue, that rape occurs by way of hideous legislation mandating unnecessary medical intrusion into women's bodies. (And as the history of war teaches, "to the victor go the spoils.")

- Advertisement -

In the current "war' Mr. Obama and liberals clearly constitute the enemy.  One way to defeat the enemy or deny them their power, as we know, is to demoralize the women.   By stripping women of their sovereignty, robbing them of decision-making and autonomy as well as control over their own bodies, right-wing zealots are doing what male aggressors have done for millennia.   Just as they did in Bangladesh and Bosnia, Nanking and Nigeria, they are symbolically raping women as a way of getting at their real enemy -- men in power who have something they want.   They are, to put it crudely, using the orifice to win the office.

Sound a bit over the top? Consider this.   In a recent report, Amnesty International stated that "women's bodies have become part of the terrain of conflict."   Yes, the report was about the use of rape as a weapon of war, but if sexual abuse is a deliberate strategy, can it not fairly be argued that withholding contraception and legislating medical rape also constitute a strategy on the continuum of control?    Aren't both strategies a form of social domination?   Isn't humiliation being applied in both scenarios?   Surely "punitive codes of conduct" are being applied in order to weaken the enemy.  

As Amnesty International has noted, "Women's lives and their bodies have been the unacknowledged casualties of war for far too long." Whether those casualties are overtly violent or perpetrated more subtly in order to inflict emotional torment and long-lasting psychological pain on both women and men, they are devastating weapons in the arsenal of political thought and action.  

That is why it is deeply important to understand that the so-called "war on women" is part of something much bigger and more harmful that some may think.   It is nothing less than a strategy aimed at overtaking people's lives in the name of profit and personal prosperity -- woman by woman -- one dispensable, invisible woman at a time.  

For the sake of all of us, irrespective of gender, we cannot allow that to happen.

- Advertisement -

Elayne Clift is a writer,lecturer, workshop leader and activist. She is senior correspondent for Women's Feature Service, columnist for the Keene (NH) Sentinel and Brattleboro (VT) Commons and a contributor to various publications internationally. (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What Happens When "Jane" Comes Marching Home Again?

Is America Really as Safe a Place to Live as You Thought?

Orifice Politics; What the War on Women is Really About

Why Are We Sexualizing Young Girls?

Beauty and the Beast: The Ugly Attacks on Activist Women

DSM-5 Could Be Hazardous to Your Mental Health


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 people are discussing this page, with 21 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Certainly it can be argued that the right has alwa... by intotheabyss on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:38:26 AM
Of all Obama's demagoguery this may be the best.Th... by Miriam Callaghan on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:54:16 AM
If you can be excused from contributing for contra... by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 2:07:11 PM
Absolutely-and it is time for women to fight back.... by Joslynne Davidson-Bailey on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:53:10 PM
This article is very good but the author's 'Ah ha!... by Patricia Gray on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 1:04:14 PM
The extreme patriarchs -- those who are deliberate... by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 7:34:56 PM
There's another reason men use women in their wars... by Cathy Lynn Pagano on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 1:39:05 PM
Dear Ms. Pagano...I applaud your most cogent comme... by Beverlee Couillard on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 5:44:08 PM
Women need to learn to question men's authority!&n... by Penel on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:41:59 PM
There is no war on women from the right.  The... by Ken Scott on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 1:42:55 PM
It is not the 'liberals' who have the zeal to make... by Patricia Gray on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 8:53:23 PM
Those that support this "war" reveal their inner r... by Ed Doyle on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 2:18:49 PM all those who have commented on my op ed, es... by Elayne Clift on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 2:58:54 PM
I think you're right. This campaign against women'... by Ralph Dratman on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 3:44:53 PM
In a thread on a site I visit; a conversation abou... by Beverlee Couillard on Sunday, Mar 25, 2012 at 5:50:19 PM
Women, in fact, had now fallen to a status lower t... by Amanda Lang on Monday, Mar 26, 2012 at 8:39:22 AM
All through history(and pre-history?)men have veiw... by SherryGT on Monday, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:34:12 AM
Since the late 70ties and the Reagan era, a genera... by Andreas Ohland on Monday, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:41:44 AM
War On Women: Anti-Contraception Lit Handed Out At... by Amanda Lang on Monday, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:30:05 PM
For those following this thread, I recommend a ver... by Elayne Clift on Monday, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:33:40 PM
No you are not over the top, maybe you didn't go f... by Rick Nordland on Monday, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:04:40 PM