![]() |
|
|
November 19, 2008 at 21:15:44
Promoted to Headline (H3) on 11/19/08: by Freddie Venezia Page 1 of 1 page(s) |
|
|
#1. Breaking the Unions who normally vote for and support Democrats
#2. Bringing jobs to the Red States at the expense of the Blue States
The real reason that there is a debate about whether the US Government should save the largest single entity in the US business world is that the Republican party wants to win back the White House in 2012 and doesn't care how they do it.
If the Big 3 are helped by the Federal government, 3 million jobs may be saved and many billions of dollars will be saved in pension costs, lost tax revenue, lost income, lower GDP.
But the Republicans argue that the Big 3 don't deserve being bailed out because the Big 3's management have made so many mistakes. But the workers will be the primary targets of the punishment. The CEO's and other top executives will be able get jobs in other industries, but the assembly line workers will be forced to lose all chance of a decent future and life style.
Why would the Republicans do this? Because the European and Asian car companies will fill the void and build plants in the "right to work" states of the South. There are already many Honda, Toyota and BMW plants in the Southern states and if the Big 3 go out of business, there will be at least a doubling of foreign car plants in the Red States. So who cares, as long as the cars are made here? We have to care, because when GM, Ford or Chrysler make a profit, the profit stays here, but when Honda, Toyota and BMW, or any other European or Asian car company makes a profit, the profit leaves the country. It is the same thing as buying a TV at a Wal-Mart that was made in China or buying gasoline at a Mobil station that was refined into gasoline after being pumped from the desert of Saudi Arabia.
The other thing that will be accomplished is that the UAW will effectively be broken. The UAW supports the Democratic Party with contributions and also turns out the vote. Take away all the jobs in the Blue States that depend on the Big 3 and UAW workers, and cripple the parts and materials suppliers, and the Democrats will suffer in 2012. The Blue States will lose jobs, population, Congressman and electoral votes as the population and tax base shifts to the Bible Belt.
It will also mean more home foreclosures and banks losing money, as the workers in the states where the Big 3 manufacture cars and the workers in the states that supply parts to the Big 3 plants lose their jobs. That will also doom supermarkets, clothing stores and every other kind of retail shop in cities and towns where Big 3 plants and Big 3 suppliers are major employers. It would seem that the Republicans would rather have the auto manufacturing profits leave the country and to possibly cause another depression than see Democrats win the White House again.
It is a mean spirited thing that the Republicans are doing, but what may be even more mean spirited is what the so-called "Blue Dog Democrats" are doing. The Republicans are putting party and state before country, but the "Blue Dog Democrats" are pitting state against state, and their states before country or party. The "Blue Dog Democrats" are selling out the Big 3 workers and the people who live in the states where the Big 3 manufacture cars and in the states that supply raw materials and parts to the Big 3 in order to bring European and Asian car manufacturing plants to their Southern states. As an excuse, they will use the poor business practices of the Big 3, the greed of the UAW and the laziness of the UAW workers, but all they really care about is getting re-elected because they will be able to claim that they brought jobs to their states, although the majority of money brought in by the plants in their states will leave for foreign shores.
We must save the Big 3. Strings can be attached to the tax-payer's money to safeguard the principal. But the Big 3 must not be allowed to go bankrupt. Republicans and "Blue Dog Democrats" will argue that it is about principle, but it is really about common sense and principal. The economy of the USA will not be able to withstand the loss of principal that the Big 3 going out of business will cause.
FreddieVee
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
| 7 comments |
|
Missing Piece of Puzzle
Unmentioned in the Mainstream press is that George H.W. Bush (41) is a major partner in Cerberus Capital Management(they own Chrysler and a lot more). John Snow is Chairman of Cerberus and previously, 41's Secretary of the TreasuryThe Auto bailout will happen judging by the dog and pony shows in D.C today. Poppy will get his Billions, its already a done deal for twice what they have discussed. I figure it will break Friday...$50 Billion for Auto by kato krause (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 216 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:33:26 PM
|
|
Another Missing Piece
is the defense industry. How does the Pentagon feel about possibly losing some of its biggest equipment and weapons systems suppliers? by Paul Rye (7 articles, 2 quicklinks, 22 diaries, 500 comments [44 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:17:58 AM
|
|
Reply: True
Given that we need to move to Electric passenger cars, how will that effect the manufacturing location building weapons systems? Certainly with the large Defense contracts inplace,these units would survive with or without the passenger vehicle business. by kato krause (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 216 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:18:57 AM
|
|
F. Venezia
Venezia puts it very well. by paul roberts (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 60 comments [14 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:05:52 AM
|
|
they deserve to crash
unions are always strong in a strong economy--and weak in a weak economy so union busting is not the reason-----its just trickle down crashing from outsourceing our companies,unbalanced free trade, just like what happened to the steel industry years ago when they were trying to get the government to do something about all the cheap steal comming into the country. the government did nothing and the steel industry is a shadow of what it once was----we need equal free trade,and a global minimum wage to trade--------however the big 3 did force large trucks and cars on us in compliance with the oil companies by TRADESMAN (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 335 comments [40 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:56:55 PM
|
|
True.... but....
Yes, the Republicans always have ulterior motives geared towards protecting their base: The ultrawealthy and the large corporations. No doubt, they would love to gut the Blue states of voter strength too. I agree wholeheartedly. Why don't we just drop tons of cash over the US, and let the People have it to spend? Maybe they can burn it for heating their homes this winter, soon it will be worth less than scrap paper anyway. At least the taxpayer would get SOME benefit from being saddle with more debt. Better we sell them to China, AND have it stipulated in sale the factories stay put for at least 10 years. You see, that is what BORROWING, BIGGEST DEBTOR nation in the world type countries (Spelt: U.S.A.) MUST DO: Sell it's assets to survive. by David Hastings (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 116 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:46:39 PM
|
|
SOME RESEARCH RESULTS
THE TOTAL MARKET CAPITALIZATION OF THE BIG 3 IS $11 BILLION ($1B + $3B + $7B). IF THE USA JUST FORCIBLY BUYS ALL THE STOCK, THE "STRING" CAN BE THAT THEY'RE WHOLLY OWNED BY THE USA. THEY WANT SOCIALISM, LET'S GIVE THEM THE REAL THING ! THEN, WE CAN INVEST MORE TAXPAYER MONEY KNOWING WHERE THE MONEY WILL GO. by lenngray (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 8 diaries, 77 comments) on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:19:37 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |