Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

General News

What's Next After Kagan's Confirmation?

      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 8/6/10

- Advertisement -

Elena Kagan by Harvard University

The Senate confirmed Elena Kagan's for the Supreme Court by a 63-37 margin Aug. 5, thus overcoming opposition by all but five Senate Republicans and, for those few counting, by the Justice Integrity Project that I lead.

Over the past few days, several well-meaning friends tried to cheer me up. Thanks, but not really needed.

We knew our project's opposition to her was always a long-shot, without any powerful allies. So our goals weren't really reliant on vote results. The most important goal was to try to shift, if ever so slightly, some of the debate toward substantive concerns about nominees instead of the party-line hokum at the hearings, amplified by horse-race punditry.

With the Kagan appointment, we're now seeing the ascendancy of a well-credentialed careerist to a lifetime job where it seems likely she'll help further shift constitutional power toward an unaccountable Executive Branch vastly different than one the Framers envisioned.

The Constitution-makers emphasized the duties of the Senate and House, and the vital congressional role in checks and balances. Kagan, 50, a close friend of President Obama and a former top aide to President Clinton, suggests through her writings and other actions that she's comfortable with these dangerous long-term trends.

Instead of focusing on that growing institutional problem, Senate Republicans trivialized their role by partisan, short-term talking points to stir their base. The Democrats similarly avoided serious scrutiny. Among Democrats, only Nebraska's Ben Nelson dared to violate party-line voting and even then it was for banal reasons, such as the nominee's relatively low popularity in his state.

We can all do better. Our project, for example, is ramping up scrutiny of federal judicial nominees at the trial and appeals court levels. This includes retrospective reviews since, in some instances, we've already seen sweetheart-style confirmation hearings with glaring omissions in questioning nominees who turn out to be terribly unfair judges. Where's the accountability for such Senate mistakes?

- Advertisement -

Let's look at the House process, also. The House has the responsibility under the Constitution to initiate impeachment actions when warranted, but typically takes an extremely timid approach even to preliminary oversight. The recent cases tend to stem from a clear-cut conviction for a largely private misdeed not scrutiny for a pattern of potentially corrupt dealings that could have far more serious consequences for the public.

We plan to shine a light on appalling situations, with hope that you as readers will share our concerns. The Framers, in their wisdom, avoided a statute of limitations on impeachment actions. So should the court of public opinion.

Early in my career as a newspaper reporter, I twice published stories that cost federal judges their jobs, although neither was a presidential appointee with a lifetime post. But each was highly respected, well-entrenched and quietly operating outside what were acceptable bounds of the time (although the misdeeds seem to me in retrospect fairly modest by today's lowered standards).

Researching the specifics was a professionally risky and otherwise challenging, of course. But what I most recall was the reaction afterward from remaining judges.

They liked the stories, a couple of the most eminent told me privately. They wanted their profession to be honorable, and understood that it sometimes takes an outsider to initiate necessary questions. My news organizations (there were two) and I were like an office's daily cleaning crew, occasionally creating a temporary disruption in a routine and mostly unremarkable function.

- Advertisement -

By this anecdote, I don't mean to suggest that Kagan has any potentially career-ending secret that I've researched and want to expose. Instead, my point is that oversight procedures need to be aggressive on a more routine basis, while hopefully fair-minded.

In Kagan's situation, a few on both the right and left have suggested that her expansionist view of presidential power to fight terror threats may stem from a supposedly secret family relationship to conservative scholars Donald Kagan and his two sons, Robert and Frederick Kagan. The three male Kagans have been opinion-leaders among those advocating much-increased U.S. military presence in the Mideast wars and for more U.S. security against domestic terrorism threats.

This speculation about a potentially hidden family relationship involves a variety of coincidences. Among them, the first names "Robert" and "Elena" are in each family tree, and standard biographical sources are elusive on certain family details.

Next Page  1  |  2

Andrew Kreig is an investigative reporter, attorney, author, business strategist, radio host, and longtime non-profit executive based in Washington, DC. His most recent book is "Presidential Puppetry: Obama, Romney and Their Masters," the (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama Team Feared Coup If He Prosecuted War Crimes

Cain's 'high-tech lynching' defense problem...Clarence Thomas lied

June Trial Looms As Obama DOJ Crusades Against Critics

Thomas Must Resign, Says Former Judge, Lover

CIA Executive's Son: Agency Murdered JFK & Lover

Rove Repeatedly Lies on Fox News About Siegelman Case


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Readers:I editedfrom this columna wry mentionthata... by Andrew Kreig on Saturday, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:03:12 AM
Justice Kagan's appointment stirs poignant mixed f... by Miriam Callaghan on Sunday, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:25:33 PM
Hi Miriam!Thanks for sharing those valuable insigh... by Andrew Kreig on Sunday, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:26:07 PM