Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   12 comments

General News

What Happens When Corruption Is Legal?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

News 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 3/8/14

- Advertisement -

The Office Of Inspector General (IG) of the U.S. State Department has determined that all of the corruption that was entailed in the preparation of the Hillary Clinton State Department's two Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) on the TransCanada corporation's proposed Keystone XL Pipeline, and that is still present in the John Kerry State Department's final EIS, was legal.

Prior to issuing that judgment, the Sierra Club (SC) and Friends of the Earth (FOE) had written to the IG alleging that the company that the Hillary Clinton State Department had chosen to write the second of the two draft EISs, Environmental Resource Management Group Inc. (ERM), and that was heavily involved in writing the John Kerry State Department's "Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Keystone XL Project," should have been disqualified from involvement in it, because:

"The State Department improperly selected ERM without conducting any independent inquiry into potential conflicts of interest, thus ignoring previous OIG [Office of the Inspector General] recommendations and its own Interim Guidance procedures."

"ERM made false and/or misleading statements to State Department regarding potential bias and conflicts of interest."

"ERM has extensive ties to the oil industry, including membership in multiple oil and gas industry trade organizations that support Keystone XL."

"ERM worked on another TransCanada project during the period covered by their conflict of interest disclosure statement, and has an extensive list of additional clients that stand to benefit from approval of the proposed pipeline, but failed to disclose these relationships."

- Advertisement -

"The State Department selected ERM based on TransCanada's recommendation."

"ERM gave false and/or misleading answers [on their application] ... and failed to disclose its business relationships."

"ERM has an extensive list of clients that would directly benefit from the approval of Keystone XL but failed to disclose any of these relationships."

"ERM staff had oil industry experience they failed to disclose."

"ERM failed to disclose its membership in numerous oil & gas trade associations."

"The State Department failed to conduct any independent inquiry into ERM as required."

"The Department of State attempted to conceal ERM's past relationships with TransCanada."

This Sierra/FOE statement was accompanied by documentation regarding each one of its points.

On February 26th came the IG's response, in the form of their "Keystone XL Pipeline Project Compliance Follow-up Review," and it found that none of that was illegal.

ERM was also involved in preparing the final version of the State Department's EIS on Keystone XL, the one from the John Kerry State Department, that was issued on 31 January 2014.

Next Page  1  |  2


The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Editor
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

First Examination of Malaysian MH-17 Cockpit Photo Shows Ukraine Government Shot that Plane Down

Indications that the U.S. Is Planning a Nuclear Attack Against Russia

Harry Reid Effectively Kills Obama's TPP and TTIP International Trade Deals

MH-17 'Investigation': Secret August 8th Agreement Seeps Out

The Propaganda War About Ukraine: How Important It Really Is

Elizabeth Warren Comes Down Hard Against Global Warming, Separates Herself From Hillary Clinton on Climate Change


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Good research, Mr. Zuesse! Thank you.What's intere... by Charles Roll on Saturday, Mar 8, 2014 at 4:48:44 PM
Redundant, as usual.  As is this article, rea... by Pal Palsimon on Saturday, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:00:24 PM
playing both sides of the street as in owning both... by zon moy on Sunday, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:01:55 AM
playing both sides of the street as in owning bot... by Charles Roll on Monday, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:15:22 AM
Poison in your medicine cabinet could kill you ... by Pal Palsimon on Monday, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:08:50 AM
Dear Intelligentsia,Thank you for getting the link... by Charles Roll on Monday, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:26:51 PM
This is what happens:  A pope called Francis ... by Pal Palsimon on Saturday, Mar 8, 2014 at 4:51:24 PM
  Look out the window. ... by Howard Lewis on Saturday, Mar 8, 2014 at 5:39:19 PM
LOL.....just look at yourself and look around you... by Pal Palsimon on Saturday, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:15:29 PM
Things are coming to a head. ... Around the world... by Charles Roll on Monday, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:34:43 AM
Before corruption was legalized, Americans paid 5... by E. J. N. on Sunday, Mar 9, 2014 at 2:16:30 PM
Richard D. Wolff | Obama's Economic Significance ... by Pal Palsimon on Monday, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:39:09 AM