Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 2 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 570 (575 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   10 comments

General News

The Real Media Benghazi Cover-up

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 10/29/12

Become a Fan
  (28 fans)

TWISTING BENGHAZI SLOWLY, SLOWLY IN THE WIND

 What Could Be Worse Than Watergate?

Two of the prime terrorist suspects in the Benghazi attack have been captured (one is dead), dozens more have been arrested in Libya, and the suspect group is dispersed and hunted, with its Benghazi headquarters dismantled -- but one wouldn't know this listening to Republicans inside the Benghazi media bubble, whether partisans or reporters. 

"This issue of Benghazi is really bubbling up," Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said on Fox News Oct. 28, echoing a talking point repeated on other networks and elsewhere by Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., Reince Priebus, Carly Fiorina, Rudy Giuliani and Newt Gingrich, among others.    During the next 24 hours, rightwing blogs were alive with the new meme of a "Benghazi Blackout." 

The essentials of the Benghazi attack on September 11 have been known and unchanging since the day after, as timelines by the Wall Street Journal and Associated Press attest: about 20 jihadists in a local militia, taking advantage of growing anger over an internet video, launched an organized attack on the consulate that killed two Americans and several Libyans in the course of about two hours (9:30-11:30 pm).   A quick reaction force from the CIA annex 2km came to the consulate and took the American survivors back to the annex.  While they and Libyan forces were preparing to evacuate the diplomatic personnel, there was a brief mortar attack (about 4 am) on the annex, killing two American SEALS. 

All this was clear, in broad outline, from the original reporting.  Three State Department emails leaked October 24 told the same story. 

   McCain's Talking Point: "Massive Cover-Up"    

On CBS, Sen. McCain responded to a question about Hurricane Sandy by pivoting quickly into an answer about Benghazi:  "This tragedy turned into a debacle and massive cover-up or massive incompetence in Libya is having an effect on the voter because of their view of the commander in chief. And it is now the worst cover-up or incompetence that I have ever observed in my life."  

Asked to explain what he meant, Sen. McCain, while deploying his "cover-up or incompetence" construction twice more, failed to explain what he thought was possibly being covered up. 

In mid-September, Sen. McCain took Sean Hannity and Fox News in general to task for their bad reporting on Libya: "It was you and people on Fox that said in Libya, "We didn't know who they were and let's not help these people".'   They had an election and they elected moderates. They rejected Islamists. And yes, there are al-Qaida factors and there are extremists in Libya today, but the Libyan people are friends of ours, and they support us, and they support democracy. So you were wrong about -- so you were wrong about Libya."

For Republicans, reaction to the Benghazi attack began in bad faith on September 11, when Mitt Romney opportunistically misrepresented the American response in Egypt to local unrest there due to the 14-minute Islamophobic video that had been translated into Arabic and shown on Egyptian television.   Partisan Republicans have tried to make a political issue of the Benghazi attack ever since. 

   How Is Benghazi Worse That Watergate? 

One line of attack has been to portray the Obama Administration's curiously inconsistent statements about Benghazi as some kind of a cover-up that's somehow worse than Watergate.  Sean Hannity launched the cover-up meme on September 20 on Fox News, without explaining exactly what was being covered up or why, just that it would somehow help the President's re-election, presumably the way the Watergate cover-up helped Richard Nixon's re-election in 1972.  

No one has explained the Watergate meme coherently since it began, including Sen. McCain on CBS, who slipped the smear in with a sleazy touch of indirection: "You know, somebody the other day said to me this is as bad as Watergate. Well, nobody died in Watergate. But this is either a massive cover-up or incompetence that is not acceptable service to the American people." 

Another line of Republican attack has been to assert that the U.S. could have made an effective military response to the Benghazi attack while it was happening, but chose for some unexplained reason not to do so.  There is no evidence that this is true. 

The charge is not credible for several reasons, including:

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I accept the possibility the Fox News erred on som... by Cassandra Olsen on Tuesday, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:57:45 AM
Not sure what the point here is -- surely I was no... by William Boardman on Tuesday, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:44:57 AM
You watch a wee bee too much FAUX NOOSE.  You... by Sister Begonia on Tuesday, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:22:13 PM
well, sort of.  Actually, not really.  D... by William Boardman on Tuesday, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:56:26 PM
Your own link "timelines" above pretty much explai... by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:38:31 AM
There links to three timelines, actually -- and wh... by William Boardman on Tuesday, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:05:30 PM
"What questions do you think need answering?  ... by Natalie Oberman on Thursday, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:14:59 AM
If there is a coverup that's probably because the ... by Sandy Button on Tuesday, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:39:56 PM
And that's where you lost me!  If I wanted to... by Sister Begonia on Tuesday, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:19:09 PM
Please try again.  ... by William Boardman on Tuesday, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:53:03 PM