Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest 1 Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 1 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   10 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

What Constitutes Coerced Participation?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 3/25/14

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)
- Advertisement -


By Becca [CC-BY-2.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia by By Becca [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Recently, I had a political argument with a friend about homosexuality and the law. We focused on the recent case of the photographer who objected to accepting a lesbian couple as a client for their commitment ceremony. He thought that the act of photographing the couple's ceremony would be forcing them to participate in something they disagreed with on religious grounds. (We "agreed to disagree" on the issue of whether homosexuality is a choice.)

Today, as the Hobby Lobby case is being argued at the Supreme Court, much of the discussion has focused on 1) whether corporations can really be considered to be "persons" and 2) whether they further can be considered to have religious beliefs, as such.

Within those considerations, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act , and the religiously-based case concerning the smoking of peyote (Employment Division vs. Smith) that it was a response to - is also invoked, as a way of asking when government has a compelling interest in interfering with religious practice.

Still others point out that the rights of a third party - in this case, women being denied a type of health insurance by their own employer (or that of a spouse or parent) - need to be taken into account, in a way that the peyote-smoking case did not involve.

But beyond all of these very scholarly questions, I wonder about perhaps a more basic question: What constitutes coerced participation in an activity?

- Advertisement -

Back when I was a (younger) volunteer activist for church-state separation, my co-activists and I staged a tiny protest of government-sponsored sectarian prayer in a small town. Our argument was twofold: 1) the county supervisors who were holding their meetings were representing us as citizens of the county; as such, they were symbolically representing us in their use of sectarian prayer, and that was offensive to those of us of a different religion, or no religion; 2) when we, as county citizens, needed to go to the county supervisors to conduct business, we were additionally  confronted with the need to participate in the prayers being said on our behalf at the beginning of the meetings, or risk damaging our case before them.

To go back to my discussion with my friend: is a photographer taking pictures at a commitment ceremony either being represented by the couple and their guests, or being forced to participate in the ceremony? I would argue no. The situation is different from the government meeting example; their job is to document the event. If they would need to religiously agree with the ceremony, then Jewish photographers could refuse to accept Christian clients, and vice versa. They are not there as members of the party, or forced to ask the couple for lenience in a matter of local law.

in the Hobby Lobby case, the issue of the third party needs to go deeper, to a question of boundaries. A boss' religious belief should end with that boss' personal sovereignty - not extend to the bodies of their employees and their families. Simply carrying out their secular role as insurance providers cannot be seen as violating their own religious beliefs in this case. Certainly no one - not the women in their coverage, nor the Affordable Care Act, nor any other aspect of the Obama Administration - is forcing the employer to engage in the use of contraception.

In my view, it is this issue of boundaries and personal sovereignty - not any issues of corporate personhood, corporate religiosity, or even whether contraceptives are abortifacient - that is at the core of the Hobby Lobby case.


- Advertisement -

 

http://www.amazon.com/Amy-Fried-Ph.D./e/B004QOOD04/ref=ntt_d

Amy Fried is the author of "Escaping Dick Cheney's Stomach." She received her Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior, and has been an advocate for church-state separation and other civil liberties issues. She writes on women's issues, media, veganism (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What Erectile Dysfunction Ads Say About Our Culture and Our Health

What Makes a Good Leader?

Why Disability is a Feminist Issue

Confessions of a Junk Food Vegan

Old Enough to be Raped

What Part of "Emergency" Don't You Understand?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Some of you might counter my activist experience w... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Tuesday, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:20:51 PM
I agree. I   also would like to offer an... by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:18:15 PM
Yes, many have made that argument. You might have... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Tuesday, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:47:49 PM
I'm amazed at some of the pro-Hobby Lobby tweets ... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Wednesday, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:22:02 AM
As clear as it is that Corporations are people; it... by molly cruz on Wednesday, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:31:46 AM
Why would we expect corporations to voluntarily g... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Wednesday, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:40:55 AM
So why should they? My point is the things they m... by molly cruz on Wednesday, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:29:31 PM
If we allow corporations to not pay taxes, then w... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Wednesday, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:39:17 PM
The whole Hobby Lobby controversy stems from the f... by June Genis on Wednesday, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:26:02 PM
Same for single payer. ... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Wednesday, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:36:36 PM