Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Welfare Cheats: Corporate America on the Dole

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Group(s): , Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (13 fans)

opednews.com

In the 1990s, Bill Clinton ended welfare as we know it. After three full decades of the War on Poverty, Americans were sick of federal handouts to the poor. After all, what incentive was there to be an upstanding taxpayer if the feds were doling out cash to idle scroungers? Thus, with a mighty stroke of his pen, Bill Clinton ended America's culture of dependency. No longer would Americans permit self-serving scoundrels to take advantage of the nation's welfare system.

Ironically, in 2008, George W. Bush once again ended welfare as we knew it. However, as opposed to the Clinton initiative, George Bush altered welfare by dramatically increasing spending, while simultaneously redefining the nature of "welfare." Whereas welfare had once been a system of social safety nets designed to moderate distress among the poor, during 2008, the federal government retooled welfare to bail out an entirely new cohort of economic bunglers: corporate America.

Following decades of deregulation, America tumbled into the twenty-first century amidst a climate of intemperate financial speculation. Nowhere was this more pronounced than in the housing market. Ultimately, lending became so frenzied that mortgage companies began approving "liar loans" for high-risk customers. In their frantic pursuit of short-term gain, mortgage companies literally threw money away on insolvent customers. Due to the pitfalls of such practices, banking executives recognized that they needed some means of reducing their exposure to financial ruin. Incredibly, rather than seizing the opportunity to implement more responsible lending practices, bankers elected to diffuse the risk of their unsound business practices throughout the entire financial system. Thus, via the magic of credit default swaps, bankers covered their butts by putting the entire economy at risk.

Of course, the beauty of this plan was that, by imperiling the entire economy, bankers could pursue insanely risky financial practices without fear of loss. Banks that were insured through credit default swaps could rest assured that, though individual banks might fail, the federal government could never allow the entire financial system to crash. Thus, the insolvency of any single bank, so long as its toxic assets had been systemically insured, would invite a swift and certain federal bailout.

In the end, I suppose it's a good thing that Clinton kicked all those poor folks off of welfare, or else there might not be enough room at the federal teat for corporate America.

 

http://goodscience.sociology.org/

Tim McGettigan is a professor of sociology at Colorado State University -- Pueblo. Tim's primary research interests are in the areas of science, technology, society (STS) and the future and Tim blogs about those topics at the following sites: The (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Stephen Hawking's God: A Stubbornly Persistent Illusion

Elementary My Dear Watson! The Beauty (and Baloney) of Being Right about Everything

It's Alive!! Ray Kurzweil, AI, and Frankentelligence

Feynman's Cosmic Onion

Einstein's God is Irrelevant

Many Worlds, but only One Reality: Stephen Hawking and the Determinist Fallacy

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

is this what the repuiblicans had in mind when the... by David Stanton on Sunday, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:55:26 AM