![]() |
By Ronald Orf (about the author) Page 1 of 1 page(s)
For OpEdNews: Ronald Orf - Writer Welcome to the “New Economy” SUCKER! By Ronald Orf FIVE SIMPLE FACTS THE REPUBLICANS DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW.
1. During the 1920’s Henry Ford decreed that nobody who worked in his automobile plants should receive less than $5 a day for their labor. Conservatives labeled him “a traitor to his class” and despaired that rewarding labor at that level would bring about the destruction of the American economic system. Ford’s response: “People need to make $5 a day to afford to buy my cars”.
2.When I was a child my mother used to reminisce about her childhood during the depression. She recalled the government slaughtering hogs and burying them in pits to try to raise the price of pork by decreasing supply. My mother knew this “supply side intervention” could not succeed because: The problem was not that people did not WANT to buy pork, but that they COULD NOT AFFORD to buy pork.
3.During the 1980’s the Reagan administration instituted a tax policy of rewarding the capital side of the economic equation. “Supply side” economics put into place large tax cuts for business and the wealthy. The misnamed “Department of Labor” became the “stick it to labor” department throwing roadblocks at unionization and minimum wage increases while encouraging the outsourcing of industrial jobs to places where labor would be far less demanding. Many American workers bought in to the scheme on the hint that their reward would come through higher productivity and corporate profits. They overlooked that the gains in profits and productivity were systematically transferred to management and the top 5% of the population through incentives and a capital gains tax rate far lower than the working class was paying on their stagnant salaries. Surprisingly, it all SEEMED to work, and whenever possible, the Republicans extended the “Reagan Revolution” to all aspects of the economy. Unfortunately, much like abstinence based education, “supply side economics” never actually worked, and in fact brought about the disaster that is now engulfing the U.S. financial markets.
4. Most of the economic “recovery” that was brought about during the Reagan era was the responsibility of demand, and had nothing to do with the supply side cuts, which were really just the recycled “trickle down economics” of the pre-Great Depression era. Not coincidentally, the last time this percentage of American assets was held by such a small portion of the population was 1929. The Reagan-Bush-Bush economic policy has been nothing more than a method for a massive shifting of wealth that has taken 30 years to accomplish. The current situation is not part of the “normal economic cycle”, but the cumulative effect of a deliberate process of borrowing from social security and foreign governments to finance tax cuts for the wealthy while guaranteeing a financial collapse for our children. Eight trillion of our nine trillion dollar national debt, excluding the trillions to stave off the current financial disaster, has been incurred in these three administrations. The working class, who were encouraged to eat their seed corn, actually financed the “Reagan Expansion”, and while the top tier (capital) prospered, the rest of us (workers) never received that promised payoff. We lost spending power every decade, a process that has been grossly accelerated during the last seven years. We have financed our phantom middle class lifestyles by gutting the equity from our homes, making the double income family the norm, working longer hours more productively than any other industrial nation, maxing out our credit cards, and borrowing from our retirements. Despite the noble stopgap efforts, American families are belatedly realizing that they are in a financial death spiral. Even if they cut back drastically on their lifestyles they still cannot meet their essential payments for fuel, food, health care, and college costs.
Now this administration, instead of proposing payroll tax cuts that should have been instituted three decades ago, belatedly pushed a Rube Goldberg rebate scheme to stave off an economic debacle by creating demand the working class can no longer supply on their own. Instead of a revamping of the tax code, they again went to foreign markets to borrow 1% of GNP to finance the scheme. This is accompanied by pouring bad money after bad into the financial markets in the hope that the consequences of their greed and insanity can be forestalled until after the next election. But, in their hearts they know:
5. They will fail, because this time things are different!
The “service economy” is a scam. An “economic policy” based on flipping burgers, suing each other, outsourcing production, and cutting worker benefits has consequences that “the smartest guys in the room” could never seem to grasp. Come this fall the Mexican or Sri Lankan who is making your automobile or washing machine will not be buying the results of his handiwork. The average Joe no longer has the resources or the inclination to pull the economic elite out of their folly, and he will suffer disproportionately because of his inability to do so. The people who have only peripherally participated in the “greed is good” economy are tapped out, and for the first time, they realize it. They now perceive themselves as participating in a rigged game where risk is only averted for those who actually benefited from making and breaking the rules. Even sheep, if mistreated enough, can development cynicism. That is at least a start.
Ron Orf is a retired educator from Tripoli, Iowa
none
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| No comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |