Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (30 comments)

We're Not There Yet, But Health-Care Legislation Takes Giant Step Forward

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (6 fans)   -- Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

The affordable Health Care Act, introduced into the House of Representatives by Congressman John D. DINGELL (D-MI), the longest-serving Member of Congress ever, passed in the House yesterday (Saturday!) by a vote of 220-215. Co-sponsors included House veterans Charlie Rangel (D-NY) and Henry Waxman (D-CA).

If you think that's a slender margin, think again. According to today's New York Times, a minimum of 218 votes were required for it to pass. That means that three votes made the difference.

One of them came from a surprising source, a Louisiana Republican (AnhCao, R-LA), concerned with the pathetic state of health care in New Orleans but also attracted to the prohibition of funding for abortions. This decision really throws a monkey wrench into partisan solidarity, doesn't it?

And another of the nays came from an equally surprising source, considering his alignment with 39 Blue Dogs and the other 176 Republicans, Dennis Kucinich, possibly the most liberal Member of Congress ever. I hate to compare him with Lieberman and his latest apostasy. A lot of the Blue Dogs represent Republic districts and fear they won't be reelected next year if they didn't please their constituents on this landmark legislation.

Like many of us, and most of the choir I'm preaching to, Kucinich wanted single-payer health care that encompassed abortions. And the list doesn't stop there, but those are two of the salient points.

HR 3962 is 1,931 pages long on the Internet, double-spaced and in large, legible fontTimes New Roman or Georgia, maybe. It will cost $1.1 trillion over ten years.

The benefits of the bill far exceed the provisions offered by the Clinton legislation in 1993, according to the Times.

According to the Times also, Most employers would have to provide coverage or pay a tax penalty of up to 8 percent of their payroll. The bill would significantly expand Medicaid and would offer subsidies to help moderate-income people buy insurance from private companies or from a government insurance plan. It would also set up a national insurance exchange where people could shop for coverage.

It would fill the doughnut hole in Medicare Option D, a space in that coverage that extracts a few thousand dollars from those covered before they resume Medicare coveragethe amount you pay above $2,700 in drug costs and below $4,350 out of pocket, according to Hubpages.com.

There is a penalty for those who don't sign up for any insurancecoverage is available to 96 percent of the population.A penalty for those who use emergency rooms for both routine and catastrophic health care.What of the others? I'll have to read up on that, as Eisenhower used to tell the press. Illegal immigrants would not qualify, says Wikipedia. Perhaps also the billionaires? Now that would make sense. There will be an acute shortage of doctors, warns one Manhattan physician according to the Wall Street Journal. Perhaps enough to treat only billionaires?

To briefly summarize the nearly 2,000 pages, according to Opencongress.org:

it seeks to expand health care coverage to the approximately 40 million Americans who are currently uninsured by lowering the cost of health care and making the system more efficient. To that end, it includes a new government-run insurance plan (a.k.a. a public option) to compete with the private companies, a requirement that all Americans have health insurance, a ban on denying coverage because of a pre-existing condition and, to pay for it all, a surtax on individuals with incomes above $500,000."

A list of links to subjects of the bill appears at Thomas.loc.gov.

Here's what goes into effect immediately, according to:

1. BEGINS TO CLOSE THE MEDICARE PART D DONUT HOLE Reduces the donut hole by $500 and institutes a 50% discount on brand-name drugs, effective January 1, 2010.

2. IMMEDIATE HELP FOR THE UNINSURED UNTIL EXCHANGE IS AVAILABLE (INTERIM HIGH-RISK POOL) Creates a temporary insurance program until the Exchange is available for individuals who have been uninsured for several monthsor have been denied a policy because of pre-existing conditions.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

A jack of some trades, writing and editing among them, Marta Steele, an admitted and proud holdover from the late sixties, returned to activism ten years ago after first establishing her skills as a college [mostly adjunct] professor in three (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
30 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Nuremberg Law by Mark Sashine on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:34:07 AM
Nuremberg? by Marta Steele on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:24:39 AM
Roe vs Wade by Mark Sashine on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:29:28 PM
RVW by Marta Steele on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:19:32 PM
In addition, by richard on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:17:51 AM
fine by Marta Steele on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:29:21 AM
Back when by Samson on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:32:44 PM
Kucinich? by Marta Steele on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:03:30 PM
The right wing in France by Bia Winter on Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:47:11 AM
?? by Marta Steele on Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:40:44 AM
I Wonder by shadow dancer on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:18:18 PM
yummy by gone on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:20:47 AM
Awful bill written by big corporations. by Samson on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:23:26 PM
Who? by Marta Steele on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:11:23 PM
Your accompanying image of dog doo by Don Smith on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:06:40 PM
Giant Step? by Marta Steele on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:14:47 PM
relevant images by Don Smith on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:07:52 PM
Right on by Marta Steele on Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:16:54 AM
Dog-Doo image by Bia Winter on Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:08:09 AM
Who do we Pay the Fines to? by wagelaborer on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:42:44 PM
Who? by Marta Steele on Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:18:32 AM
A step forward? by Sister Begonia on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:03:29 PM
good question by Marta Steele on Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:19:15 AM
Getting the crumbs by Jeffrey Rock on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:23:47 PM
thanks! by Marta Steele on Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:26:15 AM
Right ON, Jeff! by Bia Winter on Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:01:45 AM
Founding Fathers will kick their butts in the Hereafter by Perry Logan on Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:08:00 AM
great U-tube by Marta Steele on Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:22:55 AM
Carlin Quote: by Bia Winter on Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:06:02 AM
Just wondering by shirley reese on Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:45:39 PM