Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 2   News 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (2 comments)

We gave Bush hell for it, now it's Obama's turn

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (9 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

From the beginning of George Bush's attack on Afghanistan and Iraq and throughout the rest of his administration, we pointed out the unconstitutionality of what he was doing and called him just about every derogatory term we could think of, including war criminal.

In all fairness, if Bush was a war criminal aren't we obligated to apply the same standard to Obama for doing exactly the same thing?

We pointed out that since only Congress can declare war there actually was no war in Afghanistan or Iraq. That it was a war declared by Bush. That only Congress can define what is war by declaring it. That Bush's proud claim that he was a "war president" was false because there was no war. That Bush's claim that he was "The Commander in Chief" was false because that title only applies when the military has been called into service and that hadn't been done because Congress had not declared war. That the actions in Iraq and Afghanistan were constitutionally illegal.

An article I saw somewhere said that with Obama's escalation by 30,000 more troops of the so-called war in Afghanistan, that war is now Obama's war.

Actually, Obama had a very narrow window of time in which to rid himself of any association with the illegal actions in Iraq and Afghanistan, and he missed it. That window of time was open on January 20, 2009 and it closed the next day. And on that day, the illegal actions in those countries became Obama's by default, because he allowed them to continue.

Not only did he allow them to continue, he is now increasing the death and destruction there by sending more troops.

I voted for Obama and had great hopes for him. He is literate, intelligent and rational, but like Bush, he is not familiar with constitutional principles. He is as guilty as Bush for doing the same things that Bush did.

Here's what a constitutional scholar and new president succeeding Bush would say on his election day when asked by the Pentagon about what to do in Iraq and Afghanistan:

"I am not the Commander in Chief of the military until such time as that title becomes constitutional with the declaration of war by Congress. I can't touch either of those military actions because they are illegal and I would become an accessory after the fact and complicit in a war crime.

"The actions in those countries belong to George Bush. He declared war there, they are his wars, not mine. If you want to continue those illegal wars, you'll have to go down to Dallas and talk to Bush. It's up to him if he wants to continue with them and pay for them out of his own pocket. Bush kept the US government and military involved in his wars until the end of his administration, but I am withdrawing all military and financial support in those countries as of today, the beginning of my administration. It's over. Get used to it."

 

Ed Martin is an ordinary person who is recovering from being badly over-educated. Born in the middle of the Great Depression, he is not affiliated with nor a member of any political, social or religious organization. He is especially interested in (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Yes we can! by Philip Dennany on Thursday, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:19:40 PM
By Bashing Obama Progressives Aid the GOP by Jason Paz on Friday, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:34:44 AM