Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

We Better Get Net Neutrality Signed into Law Before Media Mergers Kill the Internet as We Know It

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 6   Supported 6   News 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 2/16/14

Become a Fan
  (107 fans)

opednews.com

Source: AlterNet

In a world without net-neutrality, internet service providers will be able to "package" websites, a lot like cable providers do with TV channels.

From http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Comcast_Experience,_Philadelphia.jpg: Comcast Experience Philadelphia
Comcast Experience Philadelphia
(image by Wikipedia)


Comcast, the nation's largest cable television provider, majority owner of NBC and MSNBC, and one of the nation's largest internet service providers, recently announced that it will be buying Time Warner Cable, the nation's second largest cable television provider, for $45 billion.

That's a very big deal, pun intended.

And it has huge implications for the type and amount of content consumers will have access to.

Comcast and Time Warner are two of America's largest internet service providers, providing millions of Americans access to the World Wide Web.

If you factor in Comcast's proposed takeover of Time Warner, with last month's ruling on net neutrality, American consumers could be screwed.

Last month, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the Obama administration's net-neutrality rules.

Those rules were put in place to prevent big internet service providers, like Comcast and Time Warner, from slowing down your access to certain websites or charging for access to websites.

For example, with net-neutrality rules in place, Comcast wouldn't be able to slow down your access or charge more for your access to HBO or CBS or CNN, just because they wanted you to use NBC which they own and operate.

Thanks to the D.C. Circuit Court's ruling and the potential takeover of Time Warner, Comcast is well on its way to being able to discriminate between websites, and to make the owners of competitor websites pay more money to run their websites at higher speeds and to reach millions of American consumers.

And it also means that Comcast can jack up internet costs.

Back in 2009, Reddit user Quink created a graphic, detailing what internet prices might look like without net-neutrality

Since last month's court ruling, the graphic has gone viral, and it does a great job detailing a world without net-neutrality.

The graphic talks about a fictional internet service provider named TELCO.

With TELCO, in this new world we are in now without net-neutrality, they could set it up so you get basic internet service for $29.95 per month -- with a big catch!

The catch is, good luck finding any websites that you can access with that plan.

That's because in a world without net-neutrality, internet service providers will be able to "package" websites, a lot like cable providers do with TV channels.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.thomhartmann.com

Thom Hartmann is a Project Censored Award-winning New York Times best-selling author, and host of a nationally syndicated daily progressive talk program on the Air America Radio Network, live noon-3 PM ET. more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

S&P Blames Republicans, Mainstream Media Fails to Report It

Globalization Is Killing The Globe: Return to Local Economies

The Great Tax Con Job

The Truth about the Trust Fund-- Destroying Social Security to Destroy the Two Party System

The Deciding Moment: The Theft of Human Right

Healthcare: First They Came for the Banksters

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

When we're discussing restricting people's access ... by Philip Zack on Sunday, Feb 16, 2014 at 9:40:34 PM
With the government in the 'person' of the FTC, f... by Paul Repstock on Monday, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:24:25 AM
so you think investigative articles outing these c... by b. sadie bailey on Monday, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:18:46 PM
Freedom of communication is just too essential. I... by Paul Repstock on Monday, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:34:10 PM
Ironic that in the San Francisco area, access is p... by Theodora B Crawford on Monday, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:19:26 PM
There are anti-trust laws and as I understand it, ... by Bob Davey on Monday, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:00:16 PM
Yes! Now how do we do it? (besides social networki... by b. sadie bailey on Monday, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:16:52 PM
Oh my God! This blog could be extra charged or e... by David Vicks on Monday, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:50:05 PM
Can anyone remember back to the first days of cab... by Bob Davey on Monday, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:27:14 PM
The difference between Freedom of the Press and a ... by Neal Chalabi Chambers on Wednesday, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:58:05 AM