Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (35 comments)

Was C.S. Lewis, Author of Mere Christianity, an Intellectual?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (10 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

The religious right likes to claim the reasonableness of Christianity. One of their biggest weapons in promoting this misconception is the British "intellectual" and author of Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis. Lewis' Mere Christianity is held up by Christians as a book which finally clearly demonstrates Christianity's bond with reason. In fact, the influential Christian magazine Christianity Today voted (much as the early leaders of Christianity voted which books would be in the Bible and thus be considered "the word of God" and which books would not) Mere Christianity to be the best book of the twentieth century and claims Mere Christianity is "the best case for the essentials of orthodox Christianity in print." Mere Christianity is seen by many Christians as a guide which they sincerely believe helps them align their Christian faith with their God-given reason. For what good is a belief in God if it violates your God-given reason?

I recently completed writing a book, An Answer to C.S. Lewis' Mere Christianity, which thoroughly debunks Mere Christianity. As I was reading Lewis' Mere Christianity while doing research for my book, it became difficult to understand how he could be looked at as an intellectual. An intellectual is a person with great mental capacity. One definition from Webster's Desk Dictionary is "guided or developed by or relying on the intellect." Lewis throws this definition of intellectual out the window on many occasions throughout his book.

One glaring example among many of Lewis' lack of intellect is his ludicrous claim that the Bible is the "word of God" but then admits that witches are not real which is in conflict with the Bible at Exodus 22:18 which instructs, "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." This fear and ignorance based Bible superstition has caused the excruciating pain and death of thousands of innocent women ever since Christianity was taken seriously. Lewis does not even address the obvious contradiction of how the Bible can be the word of God while making the factual error of claiming witches are real.

As we make more and more holes in the Bible and Christianity more widely known, we will awaken sincere Christians to the truth that their religion is in direct and strong violation of their God-given reason and they must make a choice between their God-given reason and man-made "revealed" religions. It is important to do this to weaken the power of the religious right and to free sincere individuals within Christianity, and in the other "revealed" religions, from the dark fear based chains of superstition which the "revealed" religions shackle them with. And, most importantly, by doing so we are following the principle put forward by the Deist Thomas Paine who wrote, "It is an affront to truth to treat falsehood with complaisance."

 

Bob Johnson is a paralegal and a freelance writer in Florida. He was raised Roman Catholic, but after reading Thomas Paine's The Age of Reason, he became a Deist. In 1993 he founded the World Union of Deists and in 1996 he launched the first web (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
35 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

C.S. Lewis shows Christianity violates God-given reason by Bob Johnson on Friday, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:51:40 PM
asses and holes by Ned Lud on Saturday, Sep 4, 2010 at 9:25:09 AM
Witches by First Name on Saturday, Sep 4, 2010 at 9:36:29 AM
welcome by Ned Lud on Saturday, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:12:36 AM
Lewis is not an intellectual by W Lorraine Watkins on Saturday, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:51:43 AM
Proofs of whose lack of intellectual capacity? by First Name on Saturday, Sep 4, 2010 at 1:36:08 PM
Oh I have read him by W Lorraine Watkins on Saturday, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:07:34 PM
Witches - First Name by Bob Johnson on Sunday, Sep 5, 2010 at 1:47:57 PM
Oh, we're real, alright by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:06:14 PM
What a witch is by Bob Johnson on Tuesday, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:40:33 PM
Consistency by First Name on Saturday, Sep 4, 2010 at 4:29:21 PM
See my response below by W Lorraine Watkins on Saturday, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:28:04 PM
Re:"I recently completed writing a book, An Answer to C.S. L by W Lorraine Watkins on Saturday, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:05:32 PM
Sloppy, slapdash article by Robert S. Becker on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:21:11 AM
To Robert Becker re: Intellectual by Bob Johnson on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:38:04 AM
confusing intelligence with intellectual by Robert S. Becker on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:41:06 PM
We have a difference of opinon by W Lorraine Watkins on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:47:34 PM
consensus by Robert S. Becker on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:12:57 PM
Consensus by W Lorraine Watkins on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 8:10:51 PM
read my email again by Robert S. Becker on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:00:19 PM
RE read my email again by W Lorraine Watkins on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:16:20 PM
oho! by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:13:13 PM
What more do you want? by W Lorraine Watkins on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:27:16 PM
Dithpicable? by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:37:07 PM
Misinformation and Fraud by W Lorraine Watkins on Tuesday, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:37:20 AM
wishing does make things so, occasionally by J. Edward Tremlett on Tuesday, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:18:03 AM
Why do you only make personal attacks on me? by W Lorraine Watkins on Tuesday, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:38:43 AM
I wouldn't call these personal attacks by J. Edward Tremlett on Tuesday, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:24:24 PM
The mantle of reason by W Lorraine Watkins on Tuesday, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:45:28 PM
the tilting at windmills by J. Edward Tremlett on Tuesday, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:49:19 PM
Forgive the typo It's I interpreted by W Lorraine Watkins on Monday, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:20:25 PM
I look forward to Bob's book by W Lorraine Watkins on Tuesday, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:40:00 PM
Don't you know any better, Miss Watkins? by First Name on Tuesday, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:23:15 PM
I have no interest in your invitation to the pissing contest by W Lorraine Watkins on Tuesday, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:18:01 PM
A contest in which I could never prevail against you! by First Name on Tuesday, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:39:18 PM