Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 6 (10 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   11 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Wall Street's Dirtiest Deals Show Why Our Economy Fell Apart

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Interesting 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (109 fans)

If there was ever a news story that crystalized the total corruption of Wall Street, this   is it.   What follows here is a synopsis and simplification of this report.

The facts of it were exposed in an explosive Atlantic magazine story, published last year, called, "E-mails Suggest Bear Stearns Cheated Clients Out Of Millions."   The story begins at Bear Stearns, where a shyster named Jeff Verschleiser used to work -- up until the company fell apart, in large part because of the crooked schemes he devised and implemented.

Verschleiser headed Bear's mortgage-backed securities (MBSs) operations and he engaged in what at the time was the industry-wide practice:   putting together gigantic packages of crappy subprime mortgages and dumping them on unsuspecting clients in the form of (bundled-mortgage) investment securities (MBSs) that were toxic from the get-go.

But Verschleiser went beyond that.   According to a lawsuit later filed by bond insurer Ambac, Verschleiser also masterminded a kind of double-dipping scheme.   He would sell a bunch of toxic mortgages into a bond-investors' trust, which like all mortgage trusts had provisions written into their pooling and servicing agreements (PSAs) that required the original lenders to buy the loans back if said loans went into default.

So Verschleiser would indeed sell these bad mortgages back to the banks, at a discount;   but instead of passing the returned money back to the trust, per the contractual agreement, he and other Bear execs simply pocketed (stole) this returned money.

From the report in The Atlantic:

"The traders were essentially double-dipping -- getting paid twice on the deal.   Here's how:   Once the security was sold, the traders lacked a legal claim to get cash back from the bad loans because that claim belonged to the bond investors.   But these traders not only retrieved the cash, they kept it.   Thus, Bear was cheating the investors to whom they had promised to sell a safe product -- they cheated them out of their cash.   And according to former Bear Stearns and EMC traders and analysts who spoke with The Atlantic, Verschleiser was one of two originators and operators of this double dipping scheme."

To better understand this, consider a simple analogy

Imagine someone named "Bear' loaning someone (like you) a hundred bucks to buy a bushel of apples from an apple grower, and also making a deal (for you) with the grower, stipulating that he (the grower) has to buy back any apples that turn out to have worms in them.   That exactly parallels what happened here:   Bear Stearns, acting as the intermediary, sold the wormy apples back to the grower, for you, but instead of taking the money from those returned apples and passing it back to you, per your contract agreement with Bear, Bear simply kept the money, thereby cheating you -- essentially stealing from you.

Just how "wormy' were those "apples'?   In one infamous email cited in the Ambac suit, a Bear exec colorfully described the content of the "wormy' (shitty) bonds they were selling:

Bear deal manager Nicolas Smith wrote an e-mail on August 11th, 2006 to Keith Lind, a Managing Director on the trading desk, referring to a particular bond, SACO 2006-8, as "SACK OF sh*t [2006-8]" and said, "I hope you're making a lot of money off this trade."

Did Verschleiser himself know the mortgages were bad?   Not only did he know it, he went so far as to tell his colleagues in writing that the bonds were so bad that it was a waste of money to even bother hiring or paying a company to perform due diligence on them:

"Jeff Verschleiser said in an e-mail that he knew this was an issue.   He wrote to his peer Mike Nierenberg in March 2006, "[we] are wasting way too much money on Due Diligence."   A year later nothing had changed.   In March 2007, Verschleiser wrote to Nierenberg again about the same due diligence firm, "[w]e are just burning money by hiring them.""

The core problem here is that one of the ways that banks like Bear managed to convince investors to buy these shitty bonds was by "wrapping' them in bond insurance purchased through companies like Ambac.   Investors who could be shown that the bonds were insured were much less worried about possible default.

Yet another opportunity for theft

Verschleiser, seeing that Bear had managed to get firms like Ambac to insure its "sack of sh*t" bonds, saw here yet another crooked new opportunity to make money:   He first induced companies like Ambac to insure the worthless bonds, then he bet against the insurers, knowing that they would eventually take a major hit, after he set them up to do exactly that!  

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

New JFK assassination bombshells

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Corporate success has not translated into big bene... by Richard Clark on Saturday, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:25:53 AM
"A wage-earner who had lost his common rig... by Richard Clark on Saturday, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:36:06 AM
The bail outs posed the government as the enabler ... by Ray O. Sunshine on Saturday, Jan 28, 2012 at 1:43:19 PM
The U.S. Federal Reserve Bank is secretly ... by Richard Clark on Saturday, Jan 28, 2012 at 2:32:20 PM
got away with the fraud they perpetrated is becaus... by Archie on Sunday, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:17:53 AM
<<< The reason these corrupt individual... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:36:12 AM
the very well known addage that the business of Am... by Archie on Sunday, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:43:42 PM
And isn't it ironic that even though the people ... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jan 29, 2012 at 5:40:16 PM
"Wall Street is an illegal cartel that for the go... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:48:38 PM
Bill Moyers dot com ... by Richard Clark on Monday, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:38:43 AM
Former senator from N. Dakota, Byron Dor... by Richard Clark on Monday, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:54:16 AM