Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Walking the Talk versus Walking off the Cliff

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Rob Kall     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 11/22/10

Become a Fan
  (304 fans)
- Advertisement -
A reader just sent me an email, criticizing the fact that OpEdNews.com accepts corporate advertising. She wrote:

Progressives desperately need to walk their talk. It is the one thing that has most not taking them seriously. You cannot on one hand rail against corporate entities and on the other hand accept their ads. I've been in the web business since the 90's and you don't make that much off of these ads.

You have a great many who write and use your site for their own purposes. It's time for them to walk their talk as well. In order to be successful Progressives must walk their talk. We have enough of those that say one thing and do another, thus our country is in the toilet now. Set a shining example....walk your talk. It won't be easy but you want to make a stand then make it. Have you thought about reaching out to mom and pop folks for ads?

Go back to the average Joe and help them. Support ads for mom and pop businesses. You won't be able to do it overnight, but lets work towards that. I know many sites that refuse corporate ads. They state that in their info....and they have been around for years. They support the average Joe.

I titled this article walking the talk versus walking off the cliff because I think the above email is a call to walk off the cliff and, while it's well intentioned, it is also impossible.

There used to be a lot of progressive sites that didn't take advertising. Now there are very few large or mid-size ones-- truthout.org, commondreams.org, thinkprogress.org, mediamatters.org. The few that don't take advertising get a lot of contributions from private donors and/or foundations. They do that by having huge mailing lists and by exerting a lot of top-down control on content. Thinkprogress is published by Center for American Progress, headed by former Bill Clinton Chief of Staff Tony Podesta. CAP has over $10 million in funding from major democratic donors like George Soros. They also publish far less content than the sites that do run ads. At one point, truthout had a $500,000 grant from one foundation. Mediamatters.org is also well funded by wealthy progressives, to the tune of over a million a year.

Many of the top progressive sites , perhaps MOST DO operate with the support of advertising, like opednews.com, dailykos.com, firedoglake.com, alternet.org, thenation.com, huffingtonpost.com, rawstory.com, talkingpointsmemo.com. glenn greenwald, fivethirtyeight, crooksandliars.com... scores of progressive blogs.
- Advertisement -


The site I run, OpEdNews.com uses about 30 volunteer editors to assess articles submitted by well over 1500 writers a year. Those editors have no benefit from those ads and are not influenced by the advertisers in any way. Diary submitters are unmoderated entirely, though we do reserve the right to delete diaries, and actually have deleted maybe one out of 5000 submitted, usually for hate speech or potentially libelous content that puts the site at high risk of litigation. The sites that do not accept advertising tend to be more top down, with a lot less articles and a lot more top-down influence on what gets selected and included. That's an approach with a long history. But our more bottom up approach is enabled by our freedom from the dictates of big funders and foundation support that comes with caveats and pressures to conform.

it MIGHT be better to not run corporate ads, but we can't do that now. We routinely block ads that are offensive to our values. We cannot block political candidate ads because we are a non-profit and cannot be partisan.

The idea of dropping ads in order to walk the anti-corporate talk is like walking off a cliff to walk the talk. This idea of walking off a cliff to walk the talk is not just reserved for opposition to big corporate power.

In the relocalization, transition town and locavore movements, the goal is to buy more locally made and grown and sold products from local owners of small businesses. I'm a firm believer in this and routinely try to find local sources for goods, services and food. I know people who are religious about this and I've spoken to leaders in the field. They tell me that they are making progress if they can buy 10-15% locally made, grown or sold. It is impossible to do it all, 100% that way. We need to create the demand for the relocalization / transition town / locavore economy. Creating the demand, making the creation of new, local businesses to serve that demand possible is how we move up the percentages.

I'm involved in a new project aimed at creating a divestment movement that targets health insurance companies. The project's goal is to cast health insurance companies that fund lobbyists who oppose health care for all as pariahs, in the same league as tobacco and munitions manufacturers, polluters and supporters of apartheid. Should people who participate in this divestment movement cancel their health insurance policies to walk the talk? No. There is not viable solution for them...yet. But that doesn't mean that they are not walking their talk.
- Advertisement -


The writer who spurred me to write this article suggested that my site should throw out corporate ads and only take ads from mom and pop sites. We tried that before we went with the ad system we have now. The result was we had almost no advertising. There aren't enough mom and pops, not enough progressive businesses to support the progressive media. We'd love to see more. They haven't shown up.

I've called for primarying Obama because I don't believe he's walked his talk. My critics, and there are many and they can get very nasty, suggest that I shouldn't call for him being primaried without having some to suggest replace him. I disagree. I can claim that Obama cannot win and does not deserve to run and we should primary him WITHOUT having a person to suggest, though I have a few. He totally failed to walk his campaign talk, appointing status quot White House advisors who sided with the banksters not the middle class.

We need to create the space to think about this in order to open up potential candidates to think about it and to get supporters to start encouraging candidates. Some accuse progressives of not being satisfied with enough. The progressives I know are unhappy with Obama for what he's DONE, not for what he's not done. I think, if you look at what we, the progressive advertisement-accepting media DO, rather than wanting us to NOT DO the taking of ads, you'll find that we are walking the talk in major, substantive ways that are or will make a difference.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind. Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives one person at a time was too slow, he founded Opednews.com-- which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big) to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet and the Psychopathy Defense and Optimization Project.

Rob Kall Wikipedia Page

Rob Kall's Bottom Up Radio Show: Over 200 podcasts are archived for downloading here, or can be accessed from iTunes. Rob is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

Rob is, with Opednews.com the first media (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver