Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Waiting to See What Obama Says on Afghanistan

Become a Fan
  (65 fans)
By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 12/1/09

opednews.com

Flickr photo by T ruthout.org

The nation awaits an announcement from President Barack Obama tonight that will confirm that Obama has, in fact, pledged to send 35,000 more troops to Afghanistan to escalate war.

We await confirmation that some soldiers for Christmas will be getting the gift of deployment to an American theater of war in Afghanistan.

Just weeks ago, Obama was able to, with the support of the U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry, reject four military options that were on the table and send them back to the drawing board so that when they were resent to his desk they would have exit strategies in them.

None of this action, which seemed to indicate at least a personal conflict with the war, involved a plan for immediate withdrawal. None of this involved bringing an end to the quagmire we now face in Afghanistan and will surely expand if we send any more troops to Afghanistan.

And, now, this nation sits at a conjuncture waiting for Obama's primetime speech at West Point, which will be sliced, diced, dissected, disemboweled, and re-cut for mass consumption by the people of America by media pundits afterward.

Those who saw Keith Olbermann's Special Comment on Countdown Monday night or Rep. Dennis Kucinich's appearance on On the Record w/ Greta van Susteren on Friday night know American minds need to be captured in the interest of this idea that this war should be continued or else this nation's sleazy adventure in Afghanistan will become very untenable.

I cannot know or sympathize with the position for opposing Obama's current actions on the Afghanistan War, which are surely evident among Republicans who as a party find they can never support anything the president does. But, I do have the capacity to see the folly of the liberals and Democrats who have the ability to steer Obama into a more humane direction than escalation.

As Democratic supporters or supporters of Obama did a year ago after Obama won and as they did for most of 2009 if not all of 2009, Democratic Party supporters and supporters of Obama are willfully adopting a wait-and-see attitude to Obama's speech tonight.

The motivation is that maybe something he says will convince me that I am wrong to have reservations about sending more of young men and women off to war, perhaps I am operating misconceived notions when I doubt our nation's ability to afford this intervention, and it's possible that I do not know something about how Afghanistan threatens our security that the Pentagon and President Obama knows.

But, there is scarcely more than 50% who support any kind of escalation at all. There are more people willing to consider withdrawal than an expansion of this intervention to continue nation building in Afghanistan.

This has been the case since February when Obama first escalated the war by sending 17,000 more troops to Afghanistan without outlining a clear strategy or set of mission objectives for his newly inherited war.

So, this is the second surge and that he is giving a primetime speech should send a signal to everyone that like the speech he gave in Cairo on the Middle East, like the speech on race that he gave, and like a speech he gave on national security he understands that he has to use his power to persuade Americans.

His power to persuade is required if we are to move forward as a nation. And so, we will see on the stage tonight a man employing talking points aimed at propagandizing a people into believing we are wrong to think ill of this "good war" in Afghanistan.

We are wrong to question generals like Gen. Stanley McChrystal who have "served" our country well even though they exploited the deaths of soldiers like Pat Tillman to increase support for wars in the Middle East.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Kevin Gosztola is a writer and curator of Firedoglake's blog The Dissenter, a blog covering civil liberties in the age of technology. He is an editor for OpEdNews.com and a former intern and videographer for The Nation Magazine.And, he's the (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

We Do Not Consent to Warrantless "Porno-Scanning" in Airports

Do They Put Lipstick on Pigs at the Funny Farm?

How Private Prison Corporations Hope Arizona's SB1070 Will Lead to Internment Camps for Illegals

Why the Battle Against TSA Groping and Body Scanners is Justified

Give Obama a Chance to Do What?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments