Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   4 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Untying the Gordian Knot

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

One part of the financial crisis is collateralized debt obligations (CDO's).  Another is credit default swaps (CDS's). Suppose Seat of the Pants (PANTS) investment company officers cook up a CDO in which they have assembled $100M in mortgage backed bonds (MBS.)  The MBS's had an average credit rating of "B+."  Who knows what their real rating should have been, since the issuers paid the rating services to rate them.  Pants then uses them as collateral to issue a CDO with 5 tranches, the top being $243M of bonds which they have paid to get rated "AAA."  Lower tranches with higher interest rates rank all the way down to $2m in unrated equity.  PANTS sold the $243M in bonds to Greater Fool (GRTFUL).  GRTFUL eventually got antsy about getting its payments from PANTS' CDO and took out a credit default swap from insurer JERK-U- ROUND (JRKURN).  Now PANTS can't pay GRTFUL, nor can GRTFUL collect from undercapitalized JRKURN.

One of the most fundamental principles of contract law is that there must be a meeting of the minds for there to be a genuine contract. But all that really existed was a an IBG - YBG agreement among the individual financial geniuses acting as officers of these companies.  "IBG - YBG" is an understanding among the individuals that each of us will earn fees off this grossly over-leveraged "deal," and if, in the fullness of time, it collapses, "I'll be gone and You'll be Gone."  So, let's say GRTFUL sues JRKURN.  Could not a judge untie the CDS string, at least, by ruling that there was no meeting of minds between GRTFUL and JRKURN.  The CDS is nullified.  Rather it was, if not fraud or misrepresentation, a mutual mistake?  JRKURN must pay back the insurance premiums and both parties must make accounting entries to properly write off fake "values" allegedly represented by the CDS agreement.

I'd rather see this than give - what's it up to now? - the bailout of AIG - $123 Billion?

 

http://baloneyslicer.tripod.com/

The author, born 1940, is a white male American retired college professor of philosophy raised as a secular Jew by professional parents. He is a long-time minor activist in the civil rights, anti-war, profeminism movements and taught critical (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Will Bigotry Sabotage Republicans in the Election of 2012?

The Biggest Outrage: Bank "Persons" Preferred Over American Citizens

Questioning Fiscal Conservatives Talking Points -I

Stimulate Without Debt, Bankrupt the Banksters!

Boosting Organ Donation

Shared Economic Theology Causes Stagnation, Suffering

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The system might continue a bit longer. On Tues... by Brad Evans on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:21:51 PM
I Don't Know What Happened.... by Brad Evans on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:23:14 PM
Thanks. No problem about formatting. I just (11.2.... by Robert Cogan on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:52:00 PM
On closer examination, I see you correctly identif... by Robert Cogan on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:19:16 PM