Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 11/12/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (21 comments)

Understanding political anger

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (16 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

If you're a psychotherapist, I know how you can make big bucks: specialize in political anger management. Hold workshops, seminars and group therapy for people angry about politics. Do research on political anger. Interview people.

Ask questions like: How often are you angry about politics? Do you lose sleep about politics? Have you taken drugs to soothe your political nerves? Have you quarreled with with neighbors, friends, coworkers, or relatives about politics? How many hours a day do you spend reading political blogs and news stories? Has political anger ruined your serenity? Has political anger polluted your spiritual life?

Anger, like religion, used to be a private matter. People used to handle their anger and their religious faith privately. Nowadays, faith and anger are front and center in politics. It's as if personal psychological issues are being played out on the world stage.

For many people, political activism is their life, or their main hobby. This is true for both progressives and conservatives. Such activism necessitates a pretty extreme commitment to the cause, which implies anger at the opponents.

Until recently, only political junkies spent time on politics. Nowadays, tens of millions of Americans are active in politics.

Not that they necessarily have a positive influence.


Of course, there have always been war, mismanagement, corruption, injustice, and discontent, and so people have always been angry. But the anger nowadays seems more extreme. People are angry at more things: government, political parties, the media, abortion, gays, economic inequality, injustice, torture, war, and corporations. See this article. People are just angrier, and the nation is more divided -- between progressives and conservatives, between secular people and religious people, and between the haves and the have-nots.

Many progressives suffered crushing emotional damage when Gore lost in 2000, when Kerry lost in 2004, when Congress voted to fund Bush's Iraq escalation in 2007, when Congress failed to hold Bush and others accountable in 2008, when Obama disappointed their high expectations of him, and when the House voted to defund abortion in the recent health care bill.

I suppose many conservatives rent their hair in despair when Obama won the 2008 election.

I suppose, too, that the increase in anger is to be expected, given that things haven't been going well in America lately. The nation is in decline, mostly due to the extreme mismanagement, corruption, and stupidity of the Bush Administration and its supporters in Congress and the media. I'm tempted to add "cruelty" or "evilness" to the list of characteristics in the previous sentence, but it's possible that those responsible for the mess sincerely thought they were doing the right thing. That's a subject of another essay.

The scary thing is that, having wrecked nearly everything, Republicans may get away with laying the blame on President Obama and the Democrats, who, you gotta admit, haven't done a good job at holding the Republicans accountable or at changing the way things are done. The Dems seem to be bending over backwards to help the GOP. :)

Well, one alternative to anger is depression and withdrawal, or apathy. Maybe there are even more people following that route than those that follow the anger route, but you just don't hear about the depressed, withdrawn people.

Bad as things are in the US, you have to admit that in many countries overseas, things are even worse: war, corruption, extreme poverty, inflation, and injustice. Maybe people have no right to be angry. I mean: other than possibly motivating constructive activism, anger seems pretty destructive. People who are angry probably believe that they are entitled to the world treating them fairly. Is that a reasonable expectation? Shouldn't we rather be shocked when humans treat other humans well?

Angry people are unpleasant to be around, and so I bet there are many friendless political activists -- both on the Left and the Right.

On the other hand, angry people like being with other like-minded angry people, so they can kvetch together about what angers them. Sometimes I think that the main function of blogs like OpEdNews is to be a venting place for peoples' anger.

It's a truism of pop psychology that people who have excessive anger tend to project their own problems onto others. They blame others when they should learn to take responsibility for their own happiness. In other words, often anger is misdirected. It's a defense mechanism. It's unspiritual, maybe. Can you meditate (or pray) when you're filled with anger?

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://waliberals.org

DFA organizer, Democratic Precinct Committee Officer, writer, and programmer. My op-ed pieces have appeared in the Seattle Times, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and elsewhere. See http://WALiberals.org and http://TruthSite.org for my writing, my (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
21 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The last paragraph of thisarticle may say a lot by Margaret Bassett on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:54:20 PM
Generational burdens by Don Smith on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:21:52 PM
The political left and right extremes... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:57:58 PM
This Old by shadow dancer on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:39:52 PM
re: This Old by Don Smith on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:25:36 PM
A truly interesting subject... by Daniel Geery on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:27:09 PM
As you may note... by Daniel Geery on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:27:56 PM
lol by Don Smith on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:31:14 PM
Cool! by Don Smith on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:36:42 PM
Sitting by shadow dancer on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:37:27 PM
I Said by shadow dancer on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:41:30 PM
Crossroads by gone on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:12:31 PM
Nice by Don Smith on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:06:43 AM
The centrality of rage by Perry Logan on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:51:06 AM
This suggests... by Don Smith on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:26:13 AM
Slavery, Abduction, Torture and War Anger Me by Jason Paz on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:39:43 AM
Ummmmm. by Don Smith on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:21:36 AM
Now, the US Does Vigllantism, Scapegoating, Mass Murder by Jason Paz on Sunday, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:48:27 AM
Now, the US Does Vigllantism, Scapegoating, Mass Murder by Jason Paz on Sunday, Nov 15, 2009 at 3:11:11 AM
An interesting psych. experiment by Philip Pease on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:04:18 AM
Here I Was by shadow dancer on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:23:56 PM