Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   29 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Ultra-Progressives Are as Bad as the Tea Party

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 6/8/12

In his June 6 article on OpEdNews (Walker Victory: Democrat Fail and Wisconsin Crazies), Rob Kall makes the following assertions:

- don't settle for the lesser of two evils anymore.
-Vote!!. Don't buy the message that the way to fight the system is to not vote. That's exactly what the Two parties and the MSM want-- for people to stay home. Just vote for anybody but the two main parties. We need more Bernie Sanders.


Now, Rob is a knowledgeable writer, and his article also contained a lot of wisdom and some good, practical advice. But he, and a lot of the Progressive writers I come across on OEN make me want to beat my head against the wall.

The folks in the Tea Party are upset about the thrust of the Republican party, and have championed -- and elected -- candidates who reflect their views, but are too far out of the mainstream to win any national elections.

You Progressives are also frustrated that you can't field a candidate who will promise and try to deliver to you all that your left-leaning heart desires. (And who also couldn't get elected.)

Clinton didn't do it. Obama didn't do it. You're understandably tired of voting for "the lesser of evils" who doesn't come close to filling your wish-list. So now, you want to pick up your marbles and go home -- or as Rob suggested, go out and vote for anybody but the Democrat or Republican.


This article isn't about me, but I feel I need to give you enough background to see where I'm coming from.
I wasn't politically active in my early years, but have been an Independent for as long as I can remember. I'm a former businessman who tended to vote mostly for Republicans. In 2000, I was a heavy supporter of John McCain. But that was the year that George W. Bush, Karl Rove, etc. convinced me that the Republican party had changed for the worse. I became an Independent who then leaned Democratic, and who now sees no redeeming qualities in the current Republican party officials or candidates. I vote almost exclusively for Democrats, which included Gore, Kerry, and Obama for president).

They don't give me everything I want in a candidate. Just like you, I want more attention to the rank-and-file American citizen, and less playing the political game in Washington. But I am a pragmatist, and yes, I vote for the lesser of evils because it's in my best interest.

It would be in your best interests too.

As much as you -- and Tea Baggers -- want ideological purity and less playing the political game, this country is run by politicians who feel they must play the political game, and whose actions as politicians greatly affect your lives in many ways. That's true whether you vote of not.

I hate to harken back to 2000, but that election should be very instructive. Gore effectively lost, and forgetting hanging chads and a Supreme decision, it was partly due to those well-meaning Progressives who believed Ralph Nader's claim that there wasn't "a dime's worth of difference" between Bush and Gore.

Yes, they both were corrupted by the political system, and gave neither the arch-conservatives nor the ultra-liberals what they ideally wanted. But there was a hell of lot more than a dime's worth of difference. With Bush, we got wars that should never have started, with vast costs in dollars and human treasure that is ongoing today. With Bush, we also got John Roberts and Samuel Alito on the Supreme Court.

If you can't conceive of how different our world would be for Liberals and Independents if Gore had made those appointments, then you really don't have a brain that I can reason with.

I'm not saying that you should abandon your Progressive agenda of trying to change the system. I'm not saying you shouldn't try to elect more Progressive-minded candidates. But I am imploring you to be realistic in assessing the chances for election of the person you cast your vote for. Reality tells you that, regardless of your vote for any other candidate, either Mitt Romney or Barack Obama will be the United States president in 2013. I ask you to ask yourself: would you really prefer that the Republican candidate assume the presidency instead of Obama? Do you really prefer that Romney rather than Obama nominate the next justice to the U.S. Supreme Court?

I freely admit that Obama has not been a perfect president, especially when compared to the Progressive agenda. But I do think that, with all that he had to contend with, he's been a good president, and I really believe he'll be a better president in his next term (if he gets one). Would you really rather have had McCain, and would your wishes really be better served by Romney for the next four years?

I think it's time you Progressives take your thumbs out of your mouths (and your heads out of that other place) and face the reality that there aren't enough Bernie Sanders to go around right now. Realize that choosing the better of evils is the best thing you can do for your cause until you can radically change the system in, say, 2020.

 

Harry Wallace is a political independent, raised in Norfolk VA, retired from publishing in Fort Worth Texas, and now lives in Virginia Beach VA. He perpetually seeks truth through science, reason, and credible evidence,and -- sometimes -- even (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ultra-Progressives Are as Bad as the Tea Party

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
22 people are discussing this page, with 29 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

As a liberal-leaning Independent, I get a lot of q... by Wallace Harrison on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:38:08 AM
"The lesser of two evils" is equal to "a better ch... by BFalcon on Saturday, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:25:17 AM
It's not surprising that a former Republican who s... by Rob Kall on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:42:38 AM
... and my awakening came a lot sooner than most p... by Hooker Jay on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:58:04 PM
OK, I admit I am overwhelmed by the logical, but I... by Wallace Harrison on Saturday, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:04:09 AM
We have nearly 5 months to make the Justice, or Gr... by Jerry Scott on Saturday, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:05:09 AM
And he did not really betray what he said he would... by BFalcon on Saturday, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:36:35 AM
to compare Tea- Party and OENTea- party  does... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:14:19 AM
every time the democrats lose it is because they h... by zon moy on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:32:47 PM
Sorry, Mr. Harrison.   BO is not the can... by sand fessler on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:28:48 AM
re:   "I care less about the economy and HIS ... by Marta B on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:34:06 PM
You Mr. harrison are still a big part of whats wro... by liberalsrock on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:01:42 AM
 "But he, and a lot of the Progressive writer... by Robert S. Becker on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:09:37 AM
 Sir,  I'm not in position to answer com... by Ad Du on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:15:22 PM
there is no lesser of two evils. And Gore lik... by Daniel Geery on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:07:06 PM
Your argument is the same used to support fracking... by SherryGT on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:28:09 PM
"wants to regress our country back to the good ol'... by Kansas Bright on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:33:56 PM
Why does it say "Congress shall make no law ..."? ... by Kansas Bright on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:55:57 PM
Yeah, you certainly are a former Republican. I lov... by Denny Chericone on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:54:24 PM
I have always said that left to right is not a str... by joe miller on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:48:43 PM
is still voting for "evil". First let me bring... by Kansas Bright on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:15:07 PM
Either the Dems will take a hard left and start wi... by David Smith on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:28:54 PM
Couldn't agree more.... by Marta B on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:21:07 PM
RE: "If you can't conceive of how different our wo... by Marta B on Friday, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:50:51 PM
What total utter crap! The Republicans are able... by Chris Borland on Saturday, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:52:47 PM
"The Function of the Democratic Party in the Polit... by Mike Preston on Sunday, Jun 10, 2012 at 4:11:45 AM
The level of intellectual idiocy in this piece is ... by Gary Gibby on Sunday, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:17:45 PM
That leaves Romney on the ballot for as far as we ... by Robert S. Becker on Sunday, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:19:41 PM
Most people have been voting for the lesser of two... by Bill Samuel on Sunday, Jun 10, 2012 at 6:43:44 PM