Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   11 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Ukrainians Get IMF's Bitter Medicine

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 6   Valuable 6   Supported 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 4/2/14

Become a Fan
  (53 fans)
- Advertisement -

Source: Consortium News

Ukraine's acting Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk. (Photo credit: Ybilyk)
Ukraine's acting Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk.
(image by
(Photo credit: Ybilyk))   DMCA

It's a safe bet that most of the Ukrainians who flooded Maidan Square in Kiev in February did not do so because they wanted the International Monetary Fund to make their lives even more miserable by slashing subsidies for heat, gutting pensions and devaluing the currency to make everyday goods more expensive.

But thanks to the U.S.-backed coup that ousted elected President Viktor Yanukovych and replaced him with a regime including far-right parties, super-rich "oligarchs" and technocrats with little sympathy for the suffering of average people, that's exactly what happened. Although lacking legitimacy that would come from national elections, the coup regime pushed through the demands of the Washington-based IMF.

The process began just 10 days after the violent Feb. 22 coup that forced Yanukovych to flee for his life. IMF officials landed in Kiev on March 4 to hammer out a deal that acting Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, himself a chilly bank technocrat, has acknowledged is "very unpopular, very difficult, very tough."

What is also striking about the IMF plan is that it puts virtually all the pain on average Ukrainians. There is nothing in the economic "reform" package that extracts some of the ill-gotten gains from Ukraine's ten or so "oligarchs," the multimillionaires and even billionaires who largely plundered Ukraine's wealth after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

There is no plan for demanding that these "oligarchs" kick in some percentage of their net worth to help their own country. Instead, hard-pressed citizens of the United States and Europe are expected to carry the financial load.

- Advertisement -

The U.S. Congress voted by large bipartisan majorities to have the American taxpayers provide $1 billion in aid to Ukraine's coup regime. Further, the IMF predicts that its $18 billion in loan guarantees could generate up to $27 billion from the international community over the next two years.

Though the IMF plan includes some promises about fighting corruption, there is no requirement that the West's billions of dollars will go toward government programs that might actually strengthen Ukraine and help the average Ukrainian by putting the jobless to work. Nothing about upgrading the infrastructure or providing improved educational opportunities, better health care and other programs that might reduce some of Ukraine's social pressures and make it a more viable nation.

For instance, investing in roads and rail could make Ukraine a more attractive investment opportunity for agricultural corporations eyeing the country's rich soil which historically has made it the breadbasket for much of Central and Eastern Europe.

Cookie-Cutter Approach

Instead, the IMF has applied its usual cookie-cutter approach toward a troubled nation: reduce public spending, slash social programs, eliminate energy subsidies, devalue the currency, raise taxes, impose triggers for more austerity if inflation rises, etc.

- Advertisement -

Some economists project that the cumulative impact of the IMF "reforms" could result in a 3 percent contraction of Ukraine's already depressed economy, which fell into a severe recession after the Wall Street crash of 2008 and has been inching along at almost zero growth the past two years. But Yatsenyuk warned parliament that the drop in the GDP could be more like 10 percent if corrective actions were not taken.

But those actions will inflict more hardship on the Ukrainian people -- their "99 percent" -- while giving Ukraine's "1 percent" pretty much a pass. Yet, beyond fairness, there's also the question of the legitimacy of the coup regime taking on new debt obligations without the consent of the Ukrainian people.

After the violent ouster of elected President Yanukovych on Feb. 22 -- after he rejected the IMF's terms -- the post-coup parliament cobbled together a new government which involved handing out four ministries to far-right parties whose armed neo-Nazi militias had spear-headed the coup.

Yatsenyuk was the personal choice of U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Victoria Nuland to lead the new government. Weeks before the coup, Nuland was caught discussing with U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt who should serve in a new government. Nuland said in a phone call to Pyatt that was intercepted and posted online that "Yats is the guy" -- and he was installed as prime minister once Yanukovych was gone. [See Consortiumnews.com's "What Neocons Want from Ukraine Crisis."]

Ukraine's parliament has set a presidential election for May 25, and protesters in the Maidan also sought quick parliamentary elections. But Western diplomats have been urging a delay in the parliamentary balloting as well as postponement of the most onerous IMF provisions until after the May 25 vote. That way the election will have come and gone before the beleaguered Ukrainians truly understand how painful the IMF austerity will be.

As the New York Times reported, "Senior Western officials said on [March 26] that the loans from the United States and from the I.M.F. would be structured to get the government through its first few months without undue political upheaval, putting off some of the more difficult changes until after the May election. The West has also chosen not to press for early parliamentary elections, one senior official said, because 'the priority now is stabilization in Kiev and de-escalation with Moscow.'"

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.consortiumnews.com

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at
(more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The CIA/Likud Sinking of Jimmy Carter

What Did US Spy Satellites See in Ukraine?

Ron Paul's Appalling World View

Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

The Disappearance of Keith Olbermann

A Perjurer on the US Supreme Court

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Robert Parry's report is terrific, as usual. ... by Eric Zuesse on Wednesday, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:41:59 PM
Pravda.ru famous by McCain. Looks like pragmatic m... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:41:53 AM
You can not act in 21st century as in 19th... it w... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:51:38 AM
Antiamericanism is on it's top in Europe. All wait... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:01:24 AM
Moldova and Transdniestria. Another part of Moldo... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:09:39 AM
Crimeans will be the winners in any possible scena... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:12:41 AM
As usual, Mr. Parry has no answers, just a rather ... by Gary Kutcher on Thursday, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:06:53 AM
Hey I.m a Ron Paul supporter as well but Parry is ... by George W.Reichel on Thursday, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:59:19 PM
The Pauls are ok on ending foreign wars, ending th... by Gregory Kozloff on Friday, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:30:21 AM
3. The IMF (The Globalization of Capitalism) Ma... by Ethan Hollow on Friday, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:07:12 AM
Very Interesting mention Ethan, as was Mr.Parry ar... by urb musak on Saturday, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:49:32 PM