Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   17 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Ukraine via the Chicago School

      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 3/11/14

Become a Fan
  (35 fans)
- Advertisement -

(Article changed on March 11, 2014 at 14:09)

Some American commentators close to the Obama administration are touting the coup in Kiev as a successful tit for tat for Russia's obstruction of U.S. war plans against Syria and its broader plans for world order. However, the Europeans, who get a lot of their gas from Russia, are split over joining "a coalition of the willing'. At the NATO defense ministers meeting in Brussels on Feb. 26, German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen insisted that a solution could be found through cooperation with Moscow. She was echoed by the German business community.

In contrast, as reported Feb. 26 by the European Policy Centre in Brussels, British neoconservative policy advisor Amanda Paul demanded the EU adopt a tougher line against Putin.  The conservative daily Die Zeit agreed, noting that "although reason, caution and compromise are good virtues, Europe have to learn power politics. We believe that the world is rational, with lots of compromise and consideration. In reality, Man is not a moral animal, but an animal of power."

It is no coincidence that this quote should come from the German business community, for it expresses an ideology that is deeply rooted in that country, and which has gained significant influence, albeit under the radar, in the U.S., although it constituted the philosophical basis of the Nazi state.

To make this point I will turn to a surprising source: British former diplomate Alastair Crooke's 2009 book "Resistance: The Essence of the Islamist Revolution'.  Unlike NY Times bestsellers that deal with Islam, it introduces the reader to analyses of Western ideology by Islamist scholars, revealing knowledge ignored by most American college graduates.[

From Vintage Vietnam War Era Zippo Cigarette Lighter Dated 70-71-72 with Map of Vietnam
Vintage Vietnam War Era Zippo Cigarette Lighter Dated 70-71-72 with Map of Vietnam
(image by France1978)

During the Vietnam War, the well-known conservative philosopher Alan Bloom accused liberalism of undermining American values and in particular patriotism. He claimed that one of liberalism's founders, John Locke, who influenced both the French and American revolutions, extended Hobbes' ideas about liberal government, rights, the "self-aware Self' and innate human goodness.  Bloom and other Chicago School philosophers and economists, starting with Leo Strauss, were convinced that liberalism had thus led to nihilism, a "defining modern disorder' that discourages citizens from sacrificing themselves for the State. The idea of nihilism had been laid out by Heidegger and Nietzsche, and led to the path taken by Nazi Germany. It was elaborated by their disciple, Carl Schmitt, who was none other than Leo Strauss's friend and mentor. 

The "Chicago School', as it is widely know, is presented as being concerned strictly with economics, it's best-known representative being Milton Friedman.  In fact, it has been a major player in the development of the overall Neo-Con-servative philosophy. From here I will simply cut and paste a slighted edited version of Crooke's analysis of Neo-Conservatism's philosophical background as it appears starting on page 248  of  "RESISTANCE":

- Advertisement -

Carl Schmitt was born the son of a small businessman in Westphalia in 1888. He studied law in Berlin, Munich and Strasbourg and became Professor of Law at Berlin University. He joined the Nazi party, and with Hermann Goring's assistance, was appointed Chief Jurist. His legal arguments for dictatorship were seen to justify the 'Fuhrer' state." (Here is the precursor of the Unitary Presidency!) "Schmitt presented himself as anti-Semitic; but despite his expressed views, the Nazis did not trust him: he was denounced as an opportunist and Catholic pretender. He lost his position as Chief Jurist, but retained his professorship. After the war and a period of internment he continued to exercise wide influence - receiving a continuous flow of visitors seeking out his ideas on the failings of liberalism and its incompatibility with democracy.

It was through (Schmitt's) critique of liberalism, and his redefinition of the nature of power and politics, that Strauss' ideas had their influence: Schmitt and Leo Strauss were life-long friends. Schmitt supported Strauss for a Rockefeller Foundation fellowship, and Strauss remained an ardent admirer and scholar, who taught his works - many of which were translated and published by Chicago University Press and circulated among Strauss's so-called 'Chicago School' followers. 6 It was only in one important respect that their paths had diverged: Strauss, a Jew, left Germany for the US; and Schmitt, a devout Catholic, joined the Nazi party in 1933.

Schmitt's Political Theology, published in 1922, derived its title from his assertion that all significant concepts of the modern theory of the state are no more than secularized ideas originating from religious themes, an argument we too have made in earlier chapters. In other words, Schmitt argued that political theory traditionally has looked at the state and sovereignty through the same prism that theology views God - that is from ethical principles.

From this starting point evolved his Concept of the Political, published in 1932, in which he argued that this approach had been misconceived: politics was totally different from theology. Moral philosophers and theologians may be preoccupied with justice and equity, but politics has nothing to do with making the world fairer or more just - that is the task of moralists and theologians. Politics for Schmitt concerns power and survival, and nothing more.

Distinguished from the jostling of party politics, the 'true' political represents the essence of power - it is power's identity. While churches are predominant in religion, or society is predominant in economics, the state is predominant in politics.

- Advertisement -

It was an attempt to define exactly what politics is: the political is the most intense and extreme antagonism, Schmitt wrote. War is the most violent form that politics takes, but even short of war, politics still requires that you treat your opposition as antagonist to everything in which you believe. It's not personal, you do not have to hate him, but you have to be prepared to destroy him if necessary. Schmitt challenged liberals to admit that politics was literally a 'matter of life and death.

Here we have a clear explanation for what Washington's consistent policy of designating every country that does not toe its line as "enemy', its regime to be "changed'. Indeed, according to Crooke:

"This distinction had to be taken to the limit , to the point of life or death, which is to say that the enemy is whom-soever is, in an especially intense way, something different and alien . Such an enemy need not even be of a different nationality: as long as the conflict is potentially intense enough to become a violent one between political entities, the actual substance of enmity may be anything.

This deliberate dichotomy between power and moral or theological objectives reflected Schmitt's belief that liberalism's basis in human rights and a preoccupation with self cannot provide a reasonable justification for sacrificing oneself for the state - in other words, the Vietnam protesters were acting exactly as Schmitt would have expected in the circumstances."

While Crooke is referring to events of half a century ago, his description of Schmitt's philosophy, so influential in the American university that has been the incubator of neo-conservatism, also illuminates what is going on today in Ukraine: the Right Sector which idolizes Stepan Bandera, who fought with the Nazis, appears as a bunch of thugs, but the are what Carl Schmitt's philosophy calls for: nationalist fanatics who will not hesitate to sacrifice themselves for the state as they cut down its enemies. 

Next Page  1  |  2

Born in Philadelphia, I spent most of my adolescent and adult years in Europe. I began my journalistic career at the French News Agency in Rome, spent two years in Cuba finding out whether the Barbados were Communists before they made the revolution ('Cuba 1964: When the Revolution was Young'). After spending half a decade in Eastern Europe, and a decade in the U.S., studying Global Survival and writing speeches in the Carter State Department, I wrote the only book that foresaw (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A time-line comparison of the rise of Fascism in Nazi Germany and today's United States.

The Rise and Fall of American Exceptionalism

Poland: Ukraine's Other Nemesis

On the Brink of WWIII, A Primer on Russian History-- Facts and Fantasy

How So-Called Progressive Journalists Mislead the Public

The Largest Democracy in the World To Be Governed by The Extreme Right


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 17 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Great perspective, a must read if you are going to... by George Eliason on Tuesday, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:23:45 PM
Having read this among other things; steeped in l... by molly cruz on Tuesday, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:12:58 PM
Ditto, Molly, I walked out of a doctoral program ... by Deena Stryker on Tuesday, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:25:10 PM
There is a difference between "perusing" Russian ... by BFalcon on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:52:15 AM
Humans have 2 natures.  We have a basic anima... by Derryl Hermanutz on Tuesday, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:57:11 PM
Your comment is a welcome breath of fresh air! ... by Deena Stryker on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:41:11 AM
I don't know if it's that neat, actually. I've met... by molly cruz on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:02:13 AM
I don't think Hermanutz meant animals literally, b... by Deena Stryker on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:36:47 AM
Then he should have said so. Animal this, animal t... by molly cruz on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:52:09 PM
I'm on your side, Molly. Get better soon! ... by Deena Stryker on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:21:31 PM
Thank you, Deena; you bring out my silly side. Co... by molly cruz on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:57:39 PM
What are you waiting for? ... by Deena Stryker on Thursday, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:02:21 AM
My metaphorical book, so to speak, you lil' cutie... by molly cruz on Thursday, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:06:18 AM
I'll do that.  You're living in C.R.?  F... by Deena Stryker on Thursday, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:51:43 PM
Lovely book!  Reminds me of Platero Y Yo, by ... by Deena Stryker on Thursday, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:35:11 PM
Thanks; I wrote it long ago; when I first got her... by molly cruz on Thursday, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:34:43 PM
Great idea, Molly. ... by Deena Stryker on Thursday, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:14:54 PM