Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   5 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

US-Allied Warships off Syrian Coastline: Naval Deployment Decided "Before" the August 21 Chemical Weapons Attack

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 6 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   News 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 9/3/13

Source: Global Research

nimitz9

A massive US and allied naval deployment is occurring in the Eastern Mediterranean off Syria's coastline as well as in the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf.

While this display of military might may not be part of an immediate attack plan on Syria, it is creating an atmosphere of fear and panic within Syria.

The US Navy has deployed the USS San Antonio, an amphibious transport ship to the Eastern Mediterranean. The San Antonio is joining five US destroyers which "are already in place for possible missile strikes on Syria, a defense official said Sunday."

The USS San Antonio, with several helicopters and hundreds of Marines on board, is "on station in the Eastern Mediterranean" but "has received no specific tasking," said the defense official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. US Navy deploys five warships, one amphibious ship to Mediterranean for Syria

While the USS San Antonio has amphibious landing equipment, which can be used to land some 6,000 sailors and marines, "no boots on the ground," however, remains the official motto.

So why then has the US deployed its most advanced amphibious landing ship? The reports suggest that this is routine and there are no attack plans:

"No amphibious landing is in the works, however, as President Barack Obama has ruled out any "boots on the ground" (Ibid)


USS San Antonio

There are currently five destroyers off the coast of Syria: the USS Stout, Mahan, Ramage, Barry and Graveley, not to mention the San Antonio amphibious landing vessel.

The destroyers are equipped with Tomahawk cruise missiles which "are ready to fire ... if Obama gives the order."

On 28 August the U.S. Navy announced the deployment of  the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Stout   en route to join four other destroyers "amid allegations that the regime of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons against civilians on August 21."

In a not unusual twist, this deployment of US and allied naval forces preceded the chemical weapons attack which is being blamed on president Bashar al Assad.

According to Naval records, the guided missile destroyerUSS Stout(DDG 55) departed Naval Station Norfolk, Va. on August 18, 2013, "for deployment to the U.S. 6th Fleet area of responsibility" (see image below upon its departure in Norfolk on August 18).

The USS Ramage destroyer left Naval Station Norfolk on August 13 for the Eastern Mediterranean, "to relieve the Mahan."

Yet in fact what was decided was to deploy all five destroyers along the Syrian coastline. This decision was taken by the Pentagon well in advance of the chemical attacks of August 21, which constitute Obama's pretext to intervene on humanitarian grounds.

"The amphibious transport dock San Antonio, carrying elements of the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit, has joined the five Navy destroyers in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, a defense official confirmed [August 30].

"'No specific tasking has been received at this point,' the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'The San Antonio is being kept in the sea as a prudent decision should ship capabilities be required.'

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

 

www.globalresearch.ca

Chossudovsky has taught as visiting professor at academic institutions in Western Europe, Latin America and Southeast Asia, has acted as economic adviser to governments of developing countries and has worked as a consultant for international (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Haiti Disaster Relief Scenario Was Envisaged by the US Military One Day Before the Earthquake

US-Allied Warships off Syrian Coastline: Naval Deployment Decided "Before" the August 21 Chemical Weapons Attack

Occupy Wall Street and "The American Autumn": Is It a "Colored Revolution"?

Was the Obama Administration involved in the Planning of the Israeli Attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla?

"The War is Worth Waging": Afghanistan's Vast Reserves of Minerals and Natural Gas

Tony Blair, Very Close to Being Indicted for War Crimes

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Interesting__Read alsothe article EVIDENCE : SYRIA... by jean labrek on Tuesday, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:58:27 PM
The situation in Syria is still in focus of the wo... by Ethan Hollow on Wednesday, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:52:24 AM
M.SHAPIRO: I can't stop thinking about that terrib... by Ethan Hollow on Wednesday, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:01:00 PM
Time Magazine has written about and discredited th... by Scott Baker on Friday, Sep 6, 2013 at 8:26:18 AM
This Parallel Government, this single head of the ... by Ettore Greco on Friday, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:29:31 AM