Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

U.S Nuclear Stockpiles: On the Road to Nowhere?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (4 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Today, the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) announced in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists its critique of the Department of Energy's plan to transform the U.S. nuclear weapons complexes, and nuclear hazard waste.
 click here Presidential hopeful John McCain pushing for more nuclear power, the fate of nuclear waste and nuclear weapons materials should become center stage.
 
POGO submitted one of the more than 100,000 public comments to the Draft Complex Transformation Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (SPEIS). The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) considered four alternatives to transform the U.S. nuclear complex.
 
Nuclear waste and Nuclear weapons will be the long-term legacy of our civilization, activists have noted. It is time to consider POGO's suggestion that pit production be halted completely. The nuclear weapons still being stockpiled are relics of our cold-war past.
POGO stated: “The timing of the NNSA review is odd, as both a new presidential administration and a bipartisan congressional commission will soon be conducting their own reviews of the country's nuclear infrastructure.”
 
POGO urged that Congress wait and consider upcoming “landmark reviews--the next administration's Nuclear Posture Review and a congressionally appointed, bipartisan commission report on the role of nonproliferation programs and missile defenses in U.S. strategic policies, which will be completed by December 1, 2008. “
Also outdating the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review is the mounting chorus for "substantial reductions" in U.S. nuclear forces--see "Toward A Nuclear-Free World," A World Free of Nuclear Weapons, and "What Are Nuclear Weapons For?"
 
POGO showed how nuclear material could be removed much quicker and reduce the risk to the 7 million people who live within a 50-mile radius of the laboratory at risk. Startling, the security is incredibly lax, and tests have shown that mock terrorists are able to steal simulated special nuclear materials and could even detonate an improvised nuclear device on the spot. 

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Oppose NNSA Nuclear Stockpile Proposals

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

James J. Murtagh, Jr. is a doctor of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine, and the Medical Director of several sleep laboratories in Southern Ohio. Dr. Murtagh extensively writes on medical ethics. Dr. Murtagh is the founder of a new (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

CRIMINAL INDUSTRY by Patrick on Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 1:30:39 AM