Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   13 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Troublemaking Washington: Pushing Ukraine to the Brink

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 2   News 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 7/10/14

Cross-posted from Smirking Chimp

'The reality is that after two decades of Nato expansion, this crisis was triggered by the west's attempt to pull Ukraine decisively into its orbit'
(image by Stop War)

"The unipolar world model has failed. People everywhere have shown their desire to choose their own destiny, preserve their own cultural identity, and oppose the West's attempts at military, financial, political and ideological domination."
-- Vladimir Putin

"While the human politics of the crisis in Ukraine garner all the headlines, it is the gas politics that in many ways lies at the heart of the conflict."
-- Eric Draitser, Waging war against Russia, one pipeline at a time, RT

What does a pipeline in Afghanistan have to do with the crisis in Ukraine?

Everything. It reveals the commercial interests that drive US policy. Just as the War in Afghanistan was largely fought to facilitate the transfer of natural gas from Turkmenistan to the Arabian Sea, so too, Washington engineered the bloody coup in Kiev to cut off energy supplies from Russia to Europe to facilitate the US pivot to Asia.

This is why policymakers in Washington are reasonably satisfied with the outcome of the war in Afghanistan despite the fact that none of the stated goals were achieved. Afghanistan is not a functioning democracy with a strong central government, drug trafficking has not been eradicated, women haven't been liberated, and the infrastructure and school systems are worse than they were before the war. By every objective standard the war was a failure. But, of course, the stated goals were just public relations blather anyway.

They don't mean anything. What matters is gas, namely the vast untapped reserves in Turkmenistan that could be extracted by privately-owned US corporations who would use their authority to control the growth of US competitors or would-be rivals like China. That's what the war was all about. The gas is going to be transported via a pipeline from Turkmenistan, across Afghanistan, Pakistan and India to the Arabian sea, eschewing Russian and Iranian territory. The completion of the so called TAPI pipeline will undermine the development of an Iranian pipeline, thus sabotaging the efforts of a US adversary.

The TAPI pipeline illustrates how Washington is aggressively securing the assets it needs to maintain its dominance for the foreseeable future. Now, check this out from The Express Tribune, July 5:

"Officials of Pakistan, India, Afghanistan and Turkmenistan are set to meet in Ashgabat next week to push ahead with a planned transnational gas pipeline connecting the four countries and reach a settlement on the award of the multi-billion-dollar project to US companies.

"'The US is pushing the four countries to grant the lucrative pipeline contract to its energy giants. Two US firms -- Chevron and ExxonMobil -- are in the race to become consortium leaders, win the project and finance the laying of the pipeline,' a senior government official said while talking to The Express Tribune.

"Washington has been lobbying for the gas supply project, called Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India (Tapi) pipeline, terming it an ideal scheme to tackle energy shortages in Pakistan. On the other side, it pressed Islamabad to shelve the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline because of a nuclear standoff with Tehran...

"According to officials, Petroleum and Natural Resources Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi will lead a delegation at the meeting of the TAPI pipeline steering committee on July 8 in Ashgabat.

"At present, bid documents are being prepared in consultation with the Asian Development Bank, which is playing the role of transaction adviser. The documents will be given to the two companies only for taking part in the tender.

"Chevron is lobbying in India, Pakistan and Afghanistan to clinch a deal, backed by the US State Department. However, other companies could also become part of the consortium that will be led either by Chevron or ExxonMobil." (TAPI pipeline: Officials to finalise contract award in Ashgabat next week, The Express Tribune)

So the pipeline plan is finally moving forward and, as the article notes, "The documents will be given to the two companies only for taking part in the tender."

Nice, eh? So the State Department applies a little muscle and "Voila," Chevron and Exxon clinch the deal. How's that for a free market?

And who do you think is going to protect that 1,000 mile stretch of pipeline through hostile Taliban-controlled Afghanistan?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


Mike is a freelance writer living in Washington state.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Class Warfare Scoreboard -- Guess Who's Winning?

Newt's Victory: Was it a "Surge" of popularity or faulty voting machines?

Is Fukushima's Doomsday Machine About to Blow?

Troublemaking Washington: Pushing Ukraine to the Brink

Dominique Strauss-Kahn was trying to torpedo the dollar

Unraveling the Welfare Safety Net - Europe Moves Closer to Banktatorship


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Excellent article. I agree with the analysis compl... by Stuart Davies on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:03:09 AM
I likedRead all! ... by rus_programmer on Friday, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:03:22 AM
The reason the series of invasions thus far are in... by Stuart Davies on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:28:16 AM
You final paragraphs dovetail with the article I j... by Deena Stryker on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:46:12 AM
Representatives of the Taliban are invited guests ... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:31:45 AM
Count this. War in Iraq and Afghanistan were plann... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:51:42 AM
Talks on Ukraine-EU association deal to kick off i... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:53:36 AM
Did you read what they want? Short. EU- UKUSA want... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:00:03 PM
You wrote above: 'Did the brainiacs who concocted ... by Hannu Virtanen on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 1:20:51 PM
Russia to establish BRICS energy click here the US... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:59:00 PM
Have you seen the WikiLeaks cables on Poroshenko? ... by Lily Chamberlain on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:34:30 PM
Wrong translation. OUR PARTY is translated as our ... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:15:19 PM
Gazprom's $45 billion South Stream project, slated... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 6:15:20 PM