Tags for This Article:

Obama-Barack (4560)  Foreign Policy (1047)  2008 Democratic Natl Conv (206)  Kerry-John (26) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ;
Add to My Group
August 27, 2008 at 22:28:33

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined on 8/27/08:
Transcript: Sen. John Kerry On Foreign Policy

by John Kerry     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

Thank you so much. Four years ago, you gave me the honor of fighting our fight. I was proud to stand with you then, and I am proud to stand with you now, to help elect Barack Obama as president of the United States.

In 2004, we came so close to victory. We are even closer now, and let me tell you, this time we're going to win. Today, the call for change is more powerful than ever, and with more seats in Congress, with more people with more passion engaged in our politics, and with a President Obama, we stand on the brink of the greatest opportunity of our generation to move this country forward.

The stakes could not be higher, because we do know what a McCain administration would look like: just like the past, just like George Bush. And this country can't afford a third Bush term. Just think: John McCain voted with George Bush 90 percent of the time. Ninety percent of George Bush is just more than we can take.

Never in modern history has an administration squandered American power so recklessly. Never has strategy been so replaced by ideology. Never has extremism so crowded out common sense and fundamental American values. Never has short-term partisan politics so depleted the strength of America's bipartisan foreign policy.

George Bush, with John McCain at his side, promised to spread freedom but delivered the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time. They misread the threat and misled the country. Instead of freedom, it's Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban and dictators everywhere that are on the march. North Korea has more bombs, and Iran is defiantly chasing one.

Our mission is to restore America's influence and position in the world. We must use all the weapons in our arsenal, above all, our values. President Obama and Vice President Biden will shut down Guantanamo, respect the Constitution, and make clear once and for all, the United States of America does not torture, not now, not ever.

We must listen and lead by example because even a nation as powerful as the United States needs some friends in this world. We need a leader who understands all our security challenges, not just bombs and guns, but global warming, global terror and global AIDS. And Barack Obama understands there is no way for America to be secure until we create clean energy here at home, not with a little more oil in five, 10 or 20 years, but with an energy revolution starting right now.

I have known and been friends with John McCain for almost 22 years. But every day now I learn something new about candidate McCain. To those who still believe in the myth of a maverick instead of the reality of a politician, I say, let's compare Sen. McCain to candidate McCain.

Candidate McCain now supports the wartime tax cuts that Sen. McCain once denounced as immoral. Candidate McCain criticizes Sen. McCain's own climate change bill. Candidate McCain says he would now vote against the immigration bill that Sen. McCain wrote. Are you kidding? Talk about being for it before you're against it.

Let me tell you, before he ever debates Barack Obama, John McCain should finish the debate with himself. And what's more, Sen. McCain, who once railed against the smears of Karl Rove when he was the target, has morphed into candidate McCain who is using the same "Rove" tactics and the same "Rove" staff to repeat the same old politics of fear and smear. Well, not this year, not this time. The Rove-McCain tactics are old and outworn, and America will reject them in 2008.

So remember, when we choose a commander in chief this November, we are electing judgment and character, not years in the Senate or years on this Earth. Time and again, Barack Obama has seen farther, thought harder, and listened better. And time and again, Barack Obama has been proven right.

When John McCain stood on the deck of an aircraft carrier just three months after 9/11 and proclaimed "Next up, Baghdad!" Barack Obama saw, even then, "an occupation of "undetermined length, undetermined cost, undetermined consequences" that would "only fan the flames of the Middle East." Well, guess what? Mission accomplished.

So who can we trust to keep America safe? When Barack Obama promised to honor the best traditions of both parties and talk to our enemies, John McCain scoffed. George Bush called it "the soft comfort of appeasement." But today, Bush's diplomats are doing exactly what Obama said: talking with Iran.

So who can we trust to keep America safe? When democracy rolled out of Russia, and the tanks rolled into Georgia, we saw John McCain respond immediately with the outdated thinking of the Cold War. Barack Obama responded like a statesman of the 21st century.

So who can we trust to keep America safe? When we called for a timetable to make Iraqis stand up for Iraq and bring our heroes home, John McCain called it "cut and run." But today, even President Bush has seen the light. He and Prime Minister Maliki agree on — guess what? — a timetable.

So who can we trust to keep America safe? The McCain-Bush Republicans have been wrong again and again and again. And they know they will lose on the issues. So, the candidate who once promised a "contest of ideas" now has nothing left but personal attacks. How insulting to suggest that those who question the mission, question the troops. How pathetic to suggest that those who question a failed policy doubt America itself. How desperate to tell the son of a single mother who chose community service over money and privilege that he doesn't put America first.

 1  |  2

 

Senator from MA, former presidential candidate

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

Kent State, Graduate work in philosophy of logic, of science, Ph.D. SIU neuroscientist, forensic neuropsychologist, PostDoc Medical College of Ohio, Preferred activities: Restoring British motorcycles, cars, Matchless, Austin Healey, Triumph, Jaguar, building an engine, programming a computer. Other stuff: SDS 1968, antiwar,911 truth advocate, anticorporatist, anti-classist, anti-neocon, pissed off. Best thing: Father. Blessed.
richardKent State, Graduate work in philosophy of logic, of science, Ph.D. SIU neuroscientist, forensic neuropsychologist, PostDoc Medical College of Ohio, Preferred activities: Restoring British motorcycles, cars, Matchless, Austin Healey, Triumph, Jaguar, building an engine, programming a computer. Other stuff: SDS 1968, antiwar,911 truth advocate, anticorporatist, anti-classist, anti-neocon, pissed off. Best thing: Father. Blessed.

bull


Dear John,

 

You a sound a bit like a cheerleader for a kinder and gentler Empire. And, of course, that is precisely what I expect(ed) from you. 

 

And you criticized Bush because he “delivered the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time. They misread the threat and misled the country. Instead of freedom, it's Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban and dictators everywhere that are on the march. North Korea has more bombs, and Iran is defiantly chasing one.”

Yet you would “deliver” wars elsewhere … surely still an international war crime... to attack those who haven’t attacked us merely because you believe they are bad... Hamas who fights Israeli oppression, Hezbollah who helped save Lebanon from yet another war of aggression, the Taliban, as onerous as they are, yet a creation of our own secret services... and dictators?  Well your governments (democrat and republican) have installed and propped up heinous dictators as long as they served the Empire’s interests. And you have removed democratic and egalitarian leaders who did not heel to the Empire’s wishes. And Iran? “Defiantly chasing” the bomb. Your proof, John?  Or is it that you believe in your ‘heart’ that the U.S. Empire deserves their oil, their natural gas, and their huge uranium mineral wealth? Your hypocrisy is astounding.

You stated, “Our mission is to restore America's influence and position in the world.” Does that mean to make the Empire bigger and better? How about we just do away with the empire and return to just being a regular guy... a regular Republic that respects the sovereignty of other nations and does not attempt to steal resources under the guise of ‘spreading democracy’. You appear simply to wish to spread in a different direction than Bush.

And maybe we should stop using “all the weapons in our arsenal, above all, our values.” and instead perhaps get rid of the folks who own you and our government and stop the nonsense of hegemony. And stop the Century-long value of stealing whatever our corporations wish to obtain from other, weaker, countries.

And does  “respect the Constitution” mean that you, personally, will work to help undue all of the news laws that have decimated it and our freedom and which have created the nascent police state? I’ll believe that when I see it. And I bet you will do not one thing to restore it. 

And it is a bit late to “make clear once and for all, the United States of America does not torture, not now, not ever” because the entire world knows that we have, do, and will torture when it serves our interests. We were doing so long before Bush and I can’t believe you (or Obama) will do one damn thing to stop it completely in the future. Because the very Empire you wish to make kinder and gentle requires the projection of power and control over the world. A world that does not want to be controlled by the U.S. Of course, the elites with which you hang out DO appear to want to control the world by creating that so-called New World Order. And whether you water board somebody or more sanitarily drop a laser controlled bomb on a home in Falluja, or on Hezbollah (defending their homeland from Israeli aggression) or upon any family anywhere … to project your damn power … it all amounts to the same thing. 

Oh, and you can take the ‘war on terror’ (or “global terror” as you call it), and the fear engendering bullcrap that it is and shove it.

by richard (0 articles, 5 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 905 comments) on Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 8:54:12 PM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

NEW IDEAS ON RESTORING U. S. ECONOMY, for the Next Secretary of Commerce, William Blaine Richardson III by Stephen Fox

Detroit vs. Wall Street: The Trillion Dollar Class War by Cameron Salisbury

Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore by Michael Moore

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Credit Card Crisis Is Here / Derivatives Next by Allen L Roland

No Bailout Oversight: Bush Stalls Inspector General Selection by Allen L Roland

Paulson shoots another arrow into the heart of the Economy by Andrew Hughes

For the GOP, the Economic Meltdown May Have Happened Just a Wee Bit Early by Bernard Weiner

Don't Expect Change: Ian Sinclair interviews Mickey Z. Posted by Mickey Z.

STILL UNANSWERED 9/11 QUESTIONS by Allen L Roland

Go To Top 50 Most Popular