OpEdNews Op Eds

Torture and Tortured Reasoning

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 3   Well Said 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 4/16/09

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
- Advertisement -

I do not see how, given the strong case brought in Nuremberg on these grounds that "mere orders or permissions are not exculpatory," that President Obama can justify relieving the CIA of its crimes. It will be seen by many world-wide an act of political cowardice! But there is, perhaps, a supervening context.

Around the planet flashes the news that President Barack Obama's administration will not pursue the perpetrators of water-boarding inside the CIA. The explanation is that they conducted themselves "in good faith," even though many of them would have or should have known that water-boarding was an act falling under the definition of torture in international law-and expressly understood by the United States government after WWII to be torture-since we prosecuted both German and Japanese for conducting water-boarding. Yes it is true that those prosecuted by the U.S. were also charged with other, more heinous acts of violence against American and Allied prisoners. The Uniform Code of Military Justice signed into law by President Harry Truman preserved much of the legal art under which the Axis prisoners were prosecuted, and among these was the concept of "lesser included offense," which also exists in common civil and criminal law. Under the rationale of "lesser included offense"

the common law crime of larceny requires the taking and carrying away of tangible property from another person, with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of that property. Robbery, under the common law, requires all of the same elements, plus the use of force or intimidation to accomplish the taking. Therefore, larceny is a lesser included offense in the offense of robbery, as every robbery includes a larceny as part of the crime. Assault is also a lesser included offense of robbery, just as battery is necessarily a lesser included offense to murder, and false imprisonment is usually a lesser included offense to kidnapping. --Wikipedia
The crime of water-boarding either is or is not a lesser included offense of outright torture. The point is that in reliance upon the authorizations given by the U.S. Department of Justice under Attorneys General Ashcroft and Gonzales, written by John Yoo and others, CIA operatives were given to understand that, in the circumstances of the prisoners being essentially stateless and therefore not classifiable as typical (or even presumptive) enemy combatants, the CIA's understandings of past international law were no longer "operative." Of course, I disagree with this idea. In the Nuremberg trials the criticism is often raised that not everything prosecuted was a statutory crime before the war. Thus, the concept of "precedent law" emanating from Nuremberg is shaky in the respect that no subsequent trials have been able confirm the reasoning that went into the establishment of the heinous acts as de jure war crimes. This is all the mitigation and extenuation I can muster for the position that CIA was "innocent" by virtue of Justice telling them they believed "aggressive interrogation," like water-boarding, to be a lesser and/or under-established war crime or even morally defensible as former Vice President Cheney believes. Among the other forms of reasoning that emerged from Nuremberg was the notion that there is a universal moral standard which all men and women of conscience would understand in situ as over-ruling the kind of permission or direct orders that led to war crimes, or in this case to "aggressive interrogation" and water-boarding. (We know not what else we have done and have had only glimpses of, but understand that there were painful and humiliating assaults on matters of personal conscience and religion). I do not see how, given the strong case brought in Nuremberg on these grounds that "mere orders or permissions are not exculpatory," that President Obama can justify relieving the CIA of its crimes. It will be seen by many world-wide an act of political cowardice! Having said that, it should be pointed out that focusing in on the Justice memos, but off-loading the burden of pursuing CIA and Army and Blackwater, etc., concentrates the moral imagination on that smaller group of people, who in fact were relied upon for completely true, honest, and expert advice on the matters of interrogations. Moreover, with the Spanish indicting these very people, what President Obama has done is draw a curtain around CIA, (which he could not afford to have pilloried in the planetary public), leaving the John Yoos and Alberto Gonzaleses, David Addingtons, et al, hanging out more or less to dry. We shall see. JB
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


James R. Brett, Ph.D. taught Russian History before (and during) long stint as an academic administrator in faculty research administration. His academic interests are the modern period of Russian History since Peter the Great, Chinese History, (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Economy v. Ecology

VP Debate: One Gigantic Mistake by Sarah Palin ... Huge!

Tell It Like It Is

The Meaning of the Mike Connell Story: Under the Bus

Capitalism, Fascism, and Socialism

Sack Rahm


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

A fine article, you demolish the feeble excuses gi... by Jason Paz on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:30:55 AM
... posted on this site. You: "Why should Obam... by Mr M on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:45:12 AM
By not prosecuting those who condone torture you g... by liberalsrock on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:45:40 AM
You need not look any further than the victim... by Sister Begonia on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:34:49 PM