Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

To The Victor Belong the Spoiled

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


- Advertisement -
While listening to the speech by Mitt Romney on U.S. foreign policy I was dismayed to hear him call for a massive increase in the defense budget. I was more upset to hear him suggest that the U.S. send heavy weapons to the Syrian opposition. I wasn't upset about this infantile mouthing of Bush's cowboy neo-con policy; I was appalled by the costs he seems willing to bear for a policy of empty rhetoric.

In 1959 Peter Sellers starred in the film "The Mouse That Roared" where Sellers leads an impoverished backward nation that declares a war on the United States of America, hoping to lose. He reckons that, having lost, the U.S. will be obliged to save his Duchy of Grand Fenwick from bankruptcy and send money to make the country viable. Although meant as an ironic comment on U.S. policy it was grounded in fact.

Despite the fact that the U.S. spends massive amounts on defense every year this is a gross understatement of what the actual costs of this defense entail. When one considers the massive costs of the Marshall Plan, the reconstruction of Iraq, the rivers of money diverted to Afghanistan and Pakistan, inter alia, the picture is clearer. The cost of fixing what the U.S. military has broken doesn't appear in full in the Pentagon's budget. It appears as foreign aid, humanitarian programs, international welfare, etc. I have done some calculations of the costs of rebuilding the countries and institutions we have destroyed or damaged since 1945, replacing damaged equipment and infrastructure and enriching political leaders who support us, and came up with the fairly constant figure that the equivalent of between 11% and 13% of the Pentagon's annual budget is being spent annually by other agencies of the U.S. government fixing what the military broke.

I suspect that if we add heavy weapons to the Syrian rebel inventory then, whenever they decide there is a victory, the US will spend a small fortune rebuilding the destroyed cities of Hama, Homs, Aleppo and the like as part of the cost of our success, just as we are rebuilding Libya. God only knows what the bombing and rebuilding of Iran will cost the taxpayer if Romney and his friends decide on unilateral intervention.

In a time of austerity, embarking on such an additional burden is self-destructive and ultimately self-defeating. Throughout U.S. post-war history, pursuing military solutions to political problems has been costly. It was been costly to our treasury. It has been costly to our reputation through the embarrassment of joining forces in common endeavor with some of the most despotic and undemocratic villains walking the face of the globe; and it has been costly to the lives of our sons and daughters who died or were wounded in foreign lands. War has not been a good investment of our property, our values or our children.

So, one can only hope in the final days of the Presidential campaign that someone will ask Romney and the neo-cons how they will pay for the rebuilding of Syria and Iran if that course is pursued. We shall be paying billions to Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan for the foreseeable future and we shall continue to pay for our proxy armies in Africa and Asia. Surely deciding to break something else we'll have to pay to fix is not progress or a rational use of scarce funds. In the words of Will Rogers addressing the First Rule of Holes, "When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging".  

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -



Dr. Gary K. Busch has had a varied career-as an international trades unionist, an academic, a businessman and a political intelligence consultant. He was a professor and Head of Department at the University of Hawaii and has been a visiting (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Hong Kong Democrats and the Triads

The Last Gasp Of Françafrique

The Fourth Plenum and the Chinese Labour Movement

The French and African Troops

Michigan And The Right-To-Work Laws

Africans Buy The Bullets The French Use To Kill Them


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The additional costs to the taxpayer of military o... by Gary Busch on Thursday, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:02:29 PM