Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   14 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Time to play 2nd Amendment Trump Card?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 12/20/12

Become a Fan
  (11 fans)

Nothing happens in politics unless one side holds a trump card and can force the other side to compromise.

In this gun debate, President Obama has a powerful Second Amendment trump card. And, if there was ever a time to use it, it's now.

Oh, you didn't know such a card existed? Well of course you didn't. Because no one ever raises the issue. Here's the full text of the Second Amendment. Read it and see if you can identify the trump card part:

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

See it? It's right there in the beginning and the kicker is at the very end.

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state..." and "... shall not be infringed ."

The part the NRA folk like best... "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms," is actually the shortest part of the Second Amendment.

Obama's trump card goes like this:

  • The President of the United States of America is, constitutionally, also the nations "Command in Chief..." the guy in charge of the military. State governors are in charge of their state militias.
  • Therefore, any national "militia" would be under the Commander in Chief's command. State militias would be under the command of State governors, which would then be responsible for their behavior -- or misbehavior.
  • Such "militias" must, be, as demanded by the Second Amendment, "well regulated."
  • And that regulation requirement, like the part of the sentence about there right to bear arms, "shall not be infringed," but only as long as the first part of these amendment is part of the deal.
  • Right now all those gun-owners out there are supremely and utterly in violation of the the very first part of the Second Amendment - they are unregulated and increasingly unruly.
  • Therefore, to wit, in order for gun-owners to claim protection under the Second Amendment they must be in full compliance with it. Full compliance, not partial.
  • They are not in full compliance with it, and therefore cannot claim such protection.

Hello Barry? You in there?

If you are in there, call a news conference and tell the NRA, and their ilk, that they have a choice:

Either back sensible and effective gun regulation, or you declare gun-owners are operating outside the constraints clearly delineated in the Second Amendment. And that they must either join a recognized and well-regulated federal or state militia, or they will be forced turn in all semi-automatic weapons in their possession until they do join such a well-regulated militia.

Oh sure, all holy hell would break loose. But the President would have the words of the Second Amendment on his side.

The Right has become accustomed to using the US Constitution to claim whatever it believes are it's rights. Well, we can play that game too. The US Constitution is in black and white. It's a contract, not a suicide pact.

Since the Right likes to claim the US Constitution is infallible and must be taken literally, fine. Then they can't have it both ways.

The first 13-words of the Second Amendment has two parts, not just one: "A well-regulated militia" as a requirement to "keep and bear arms." If the framers didn't want it that way, they wouldn't have written it that way.

So, all you self-styled "patriots," either enlist in a state or federal militia, or hand over the heat. Or, submit to sensible gun control measures. Your choice"

 

Stephen Pizzo has been published everywhere from The New York Times to Mother Jones magazine. His book, Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans, was nominated for a (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Secrets Kill Too

Dying for Change

What's the Matter With Gaza?

Who You Callin' Un-American?

I Was At the Birth...

How Crazy is Too Crazy to be President?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

washington is in the process of stripping every li... by brian scott on Friday, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:42:23 AM
>=20>=20>=20... by Stephen Pizzo on Friday, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:20:02 AM
How is Washington "in the process of stripping eve... by BFalcon on Saturday, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:45:46 AM
>=20The ballot box is what preserves our liberty, ... by Stephen Pizzo on Saturday, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:20:01 AM
Mr. Pizzo,I am not certain that your interpretatio... by Jim Morgan on Friday, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:43:57 AM
>=20>=20>=20... by Stephen Pizzo on Friday, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:20:03 PM
The Virginia Declaration of Rights was the primary... by Jim Arnold on Friday, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:28:56 PM
>=20And does the term "a well regulated militia" h... by Stephen Pizzo on Friday, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:20:02 PM
Mr. Arnold,Thank you for that information.  I... by Jim Morgan on Friday, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:25:07 PM
Jim,You make an interesting point that the 1776 Vi... by Stephen Unger on Saturday, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:39:35 PM
"Suppose the Second amendment said "A well-educate... by Stuart Chisholm on Friday, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:42:25 PM
If you've already read Virginia's Section 13 poste... by Jim Arnold on Friday, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:42:49 PM
Your explanation and documentation are just what w... by BFalcon on Saturday, Dec 22, 2012 at 7:26:25 PM
What if hanging a black man and burning his body i... by Jim Arnold on Saturday, Dec 22, 2012 at 11:19:24 PM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum