Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 15 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (18 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   25 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Time to Bell the Obama Cat

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 4/10/13

- Advertisement -

by Rusty Clark

The story goes that some mice became very upset about the cat in the house and convened an emergency meeting. They finally came up with the idea of tying a bell around the cat's neck, so the dangerous feline could no longer catch victims unawares. The plan gained a lot of enthusiastic praise, until one mouse piped up with a question that preceded a long silence: "Who's going to bell the cat?"

In recent days, the big cat in the White House has provoked denunciations from groups that have rarely crossed him. They're upset about his decision to push for cuts in Social Security benefits. "Progressive outrage has reached a boiling point," the online juggernaut MoveOn declared a few days ago.

Obama's move to cut Social Security is certainly outrageous, and it's encouraging that a wide range of progressive groups are steamed at Obama as never before. But this kind of outrage should have reached a "boiling point" a long time ago. The administration's undermining of civil liberties, scant action on climate change, huge escalation of war in Afghanistan, expansion of drone warfare, austerity policies serving Wall Street and shafting Main Street, vast deference to corporate power. . . The list is long and chilling.

So is the evasive record of many groups that are now denouncing Obama's plan to cut Social Security. Mostly, their leaders griped in private and made nice with the Obama White House in public.

Yet imagine if those groups had polarized with President Obama in 2009 on even a couple of key issues. Such progressive independence would have shown the public that there is indeed a left in this country -- that the left has principles and stands up for them -- and that Obama, far from being on the left, is in the center. Such principled clarity would have undermined the right-wing attacks on Obama as a radical, socialist, etc. -- and from the beginning could have gotten some victories out of Obama, instead of waiting more than four years to take him on.

Whether or not Obama's vicious assault on Social Security is successful, it has already jolted an unprecedented number of longtime supporters. It should be the last straw, suffused with illumination.

That past is prologue. We need to ask: Do such groups now have it in them to stop pretending that each of the Obama administration's various awful policies is some kind of anomaly?

- Advertisement -

From this spring onward, a wide range of progressive groups should be prepared to work together to effectively renounce Obama's leadership.

We need to invigorate political options other than accepting the likes of President Obama -- or embracing self-marginalization.

For progressives, there's not a lot to be gained by venting against Obama without working to implement a plausible strategy for ousting corporate war Democrats from state power. Nor is there a useful path for third parties like the Green Party in races for Congress and other partisan contests; those campaigns rarely end up with more than a tiny percentage of the vote, and the impacts are very small.

This spring, there's a lot of work beckoning for progressives who mean business about gaining electoral power for social movements; who have no intention of eliding the grim realities of the Obama presidency; who are more than fed up with false pretenses that Obama is some kind of ally of progressives; who recognize that Obama has served his last major useful purpose for progressives by blocking a Romney-Ryan regime from entering the White House; who are willing to be here now, in this historical moment, to organize against and polarize with the Obama administration in basic terms; and who, looking ahead, grasp the tragic folly of leaving the electoral field to battles between right-wing Republicans and Democrats willing to go along with the kind of destructive mess that President Obama has been serving up.

A vital next step is staring us in the face: get to work now to develop and launch grassroots progressive campaigns for next year's primaries that can defeat members of Congress who talk the talk but fail to walk the walk of challenging Obama's austerity agenda.

- Advertisement -

Who are those congressional incumbents who call themselves "progressive" but refuse to take a clear stand against slashing Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits? I have a little list. Well, actually it's not so little.

As of today, after many weeks of progressive lobbying and pleading and petitioning nationwide, 47 members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus have refused to sign the letter, initiated by Congressmen Alan Grayson and Mark Takano, pledging to "vote against any and every cut to Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security benefits -- including raising the retirement age or cutting the cost of living adjustments that our constituents earned and need."

After all this time, refusal to sign the Grayson-Takano letter is a big tipoff that those 47 House members are keeping their options open. (To see that list of 47, click here.) They want wiggle room for budget votes on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security benefits. Most of them represent a left-leaning district, and some could be toppled by grassroots progressive campaigns.

Next Page  1  |  2


Norman Solomon is the executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy and the author of "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death." He is a co-founder of

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Google Content Matches:
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Growing Campaign to Revoke Obama's Nobel Peace Prize

Is MoveOn Less Progressive Than the New York Times Editorial Board?

Obama's Escalating War on Freedom of the Press

What The Assault On Whistleblowers Has to Do With War on Syria

An Outpouring of Love and Support for Bradley Manning to Receive the Nobel Peace Prize

Obama's Justice Department: Trumpeting a New Victory in War on Freedom of the Press


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 25 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

... by Alan MacDonald on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:23:50 AM
If your perspective is more enlightened than Solom... by Jim Arnold on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:53:21 AM
"Nor is there a useful path for third parties like... by Alan 8 on Wednesday, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:41:05 PM
So, you defender of all things Green, think the wa... by Robert S. Becker on Wednesday, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:14:34 PM
You are overreacting.  His point is not to in... by Nathan Nahm on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:43:45 AM
If there are no restraints, then let her rip!How w... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:02:23 AM
Not only does Solomon not lie about Third Parties ... by George Flower on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:06:21 AM
"...and anyone with a modicum of knowledge about t... by Alan 8 on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:36:59 AM
"How many state officials are formally on your Gr... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:17:37 AM
The problem is that too many progressives are suck... by Alan 8 on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:35:36 PM
I am not defending the Democratic establishment, n... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:25:41 PM
"I don't see the Norman Solomons pushing "uncondit... by Alan 8 on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:37:23 PM
That's simply a statement of fact. I can't speak f... by Jim Arnold on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:18:47 PM
yes, relying on failed third party runs doesn't ch... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:32:10 PM
"Nor is there a useful path for third parties like... by Alan 8 on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:04:22 PM
"They refuse to acknowledge political differences ... by Alan 8 on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:05:20 PM
that right now, right here, even in very liberal d... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:26:13 PM
The Green Party just got their first state represe... by Alan 8 on Friday, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:59:48 AM
I have not attacked or dismissed or belittled the ... by Robert S. Becker on Friday, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:02:46 AM
can be found at:   MOPstr April 11, 2013 9:... by George Flower on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:20:26 AM
Liberals are beginning to realize that Obama (like... by Bud Machado on Wednesday, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:12:24 PM
I knew exactly what Obama was when they came up wi... by Textynn N on Wednesday, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:29:38 PM
You are so right. Tell me how "Progressive can yo... by Gail Harrison on Wednesday, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:16:05 PM
If Dems are not standing for the people against bi... by Textynn N on Wednesday, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:22:26 PM
A sad fact is that many good hearted, well meaning... by Stephen Unger on Friday, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:59:40 AM