Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 10/16/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

"Tight little butt." Appropriate basis for endorsement?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Women and moms running for office are subjected to outrageous sexist comments from media pundits and commentators. It hurts their campaigns and creates a toxic environment for all women and moms.

Tell the media: cover real issues, not body parts!


Take Action

Wonder why we'll likely have fewer women in Congress after the November elections than we've had in the last three decades? [1]

Well, one reason might just be because the current women running for office are too often subjected to outrageous sexist comments from media pundits and commentators--commentators who talk more about female candidates' physical attributes than about the attributes of the policies they support. From likening female U.S. Senators to prostitutes, to rating candidates based on their body shapes, media commentators are repeatedly crossing the line. [2]

For example, on September 20, a Boston-area disc jockey at WRKO said this about the Republican candidate for State Treasurer, Karyn E. Polito: "I think she's hot. She's tiny, she's short. She's got a banging little body on her. Facial wise, I give her about a seven. Body wise, I give her about an eight-and-a-half. Tight little butt. I endorse Karyn Polito." [3]

Not helpful, WRKO. Sexist media coverage like this has a proven negative impact on voters' likelihood to support women candidates and it creates a political environment that's frankly toxic for all women and mothers. [4] With all of that in mind, it's sad, but not so very surprising to hear that fewer women (and mothers) are expected to be elected this year than in the past three decades. [5]

Turn this trend around! Take a moment now to help stop the domino effect of media commentators focusing on the physical attributes of female candidates and ignoring real issues which creates a toxic political climate for all women (and mothers).

*Sign on with 1-click to our short, but direct, letter to WRKO--and other media commentators who cross the line--that says:

"Cover real issues, not body parts. Stop focusing on the physical attributes of female candidates and ignoring issues that impact families every day like fair pay for women, jobs, access to healthcare and childcare, family leave, and other family economic security policies."

http://action.momsrising.org/go/443?akid=2348.36612.PlGWLd&t=4

We'll first deliver this letter to WRKO, and then continue to deliver it in the future at strategic moments when we hear about other media commentators who also engage in sexist commentary. To help us do this, let us know if media commentators near you are engaging in sexist commentary by emailing: MEDIAWATCH@MOMSRISING.ORG

Why are we doing this? With the election coming up on Tuesday, November 2nd, we've got to keep on our toes by: both countering sexist language in the media and...remembering to vote! And heck, we've got big political and economic muscles, so let's flex them! As more than 50% of the electorate, and as the key economic decision-makers in over 80% of all consumer purchases, women have tremendous power. [6]

*Take a moment now to mark your calendar to vote by November 2nd--and also don't forget to click below to help stop the domino effect of media commentators assuming it's okay to to only focus on the physical attributes of female candidates:

http://action.momsrising.org/go/443?akid=2348.36612.PlGWLd&t=6

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Protest WRKO DJ's sexist comment

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

king (and queen) leer by Ned Lud on Sunday, Oct 17, 2010 at 6:28:18 AM