Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
21 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

This isn't what I voted for

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 5/17/09

opednews.com

Maybe Obama will prosecute W for war crimes before he is culpable of being deemed to be war criminals also; consequentially Obama might do the right thing only in an attempt of self survival. That isn't anything to be proud of and it isn't what the US needs.

The article "Obama and Holder Must Prosecute War Crimes or Become Guilty of Them Himself" states:

"The Obama administration may, on the basis of whatever twisted political logic it is operating under, not want to appoint a prosecutor and indict the war criminals of the Bush administration....

"Here, we're talking about enforcing the law. There are no options but acting. Not only does a commitment to the rule of law require prosecution here, right up to the president and vice president. The failure to prosecute war criminals is in itself a crime, meaning that there is a narrow window of time to act before Obama himself, and his attorney general Eric Holder, will be open to charges that they, too, are war criminals. (emphasis added)

"If we don't get a prosecution going of Bush administration officials responsible for war crimes, the day will come when not only will George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice and Donald Rumsfeld be unable to travel abroad. Barack Obama and Eric Holder will also be confined to US soil."

The article "Obama to Revamp Military Tribunals" states:

"As a candidate for president, Barack Obama offered himself as a clear alternative to Bush-era anti-terrorism policies. Governing has proven muddier.


"Yesterday, President Obama announced that he will revamp, rather than reject, the system of military tribunals that President George W. Bush created to try terrorism suspects. Earlier in the week, Obama indicated that he will fight the release of photos depicting alleged abuse of detainees during Bush's tenure.

"The reaction has been fierce. The American Civil Liberties Union accused the president of 'stonewalling tactics and opaque policies' after the photo decision. And yesterday, the group threw Obama's words from the campaign back at him: 'You can't put lipstick on a pig,' it said of his efforts to revamp the commissions. Human rights groups vowed to fight Obama in court."

We might as well have voted for a typical GOP propaganda master instead of Obama.  The article continues:

"Early moves to ban torture and shutter the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba -- decisions hailed by human rights groups here and abroad -- have been followed by other moves that have left many of Obama's ardent supporters disappointed and angry."

It is an entire array of changes that Obama hasn't implemented that has made progressives wonder about Obama as the article continues:

"Obama has backed Bush's warrantless wiretapping program, expanded the war in Afghanistan and opposed prosecution of those involved in what some call torture of detainees -- a refusal that continues to echo as the country debates the effectiveness of past interrogations."

Obama clearly said one thing in the campaign and is doing another now regarding the military commission system, as the article continues:

"Yesterday's announcement was a unmistakable reversal for a man who, as a candidate, had promised to shelve the military commissions and called their use under Bush an 'enormous failure.'"

"'I have faith in America's courts,' Obama said Aug. 7. 'I have faith in our JAGs. As president, I'll close Guantanamo, reject the Military Commissions Act, adhere to the Geneva Conventions. Our Constitution and our Uniform Code of Military Justice provide a framework for dealing with the terrorists.'"

Obama is playing words games with us which is just as vile as any Rove spin as the article continues:

"His message in reversing his stance yesterday was more muted. 'Military commissions have a long tradition in the United States,' Obama said in a statement. 'They are appropriate for trying enemies who violate the laws of war, provided that they are properly structured and administered.'"

I like Obama and I think that he never would have attacked Iraq and consequentially all of these crimes of big bro 43 would never have begun if we had a Democrat in office after 9/11, but by choosing to prolong these vicious policies he is not remaining truthful. The article continues:

"Top Obama aides insist that the president is staying true to his principles by ending torture, winding down the Iraq war and closing Guantanamo. But they describe as 'excruciating' the weight of the responsibility that he feels to keep the country safe.

"'The president has made some enormous strides in changing the direction of our policies,' senior adviser David Axelrod said. 'But implementing them has its challenges, because you constantly have to balance equities and responsibilities and make decisions that are in the best interest of the country's security in a way that's consistent with our values.'"

Obama has used hypocritical excuses to continue warrantless wiretapping program of the citizens of the US, increase our losses in the war in Afghanistan and resist prosecution of those involved in torture of detainees. The article continues:

Next Page  1  |  2

 


Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Bush planned the economic crisis for partisan GOP gain.

Why did we all hate Palin?

Why is Obama protecting 43?

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

What happens to US credibility if Spain finds them guilty and we don't?

Bush, with criminal intent, planned the economic crisis for partisan GOP gain.

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 people are discussing this page, with 21 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

We tried to warn numbnuts like you that the agenda... by Cinderfella on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 3:07:05 AM
We tried to warn numbnuts like you that the agenda... by Cinderfella on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 3:13:15 AM
It matters not whose name is attached to the Presi... by Dennis Kaiser on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 7:58:41 AM
OK - some can say that Obama lied to get elected.&... by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 9:42:06 AM
"OK - some can say that Obama lied to get ele... by Tom Murphy on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 2:41:48 PM
"What I see is people expecting and demanding... by Munich on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 2:56:07 PM
Mr. Murphy and Munich all use rhetoric - none of w... by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 9:30:59 PM
"'Tis wonderful to criticize. Any fool ca... by Tom Murphy on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 11:15:51 PM
I told people Kucinich was our only choice if you ... by liberalsrock on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 9:43:46 AM
you got EXACTLY what you asked for.  If you w... by jersey girl on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 11:06:14 AM
"What do we do with the detainees?"Sell ... by Mark Watterson on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 12:46:30 PM
I hadn't really taken the time to think about ... by Steven Thompson on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 4:15:22 PM
Because you were told so by the fine folks who tol... by Mark Watterson on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 5:07:23 PM
"This" is exactly what you voted for...e... by Mark Watterson on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 1:46:31 PM
Now wait just a cotton pickin' minute here. The pr... by Steven Thompson on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 4:27:55 PM
You tell us...... by Mark Watterson on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 5:09:27 PM
US is to be exposed to a constant barrage of propa... by Richard Mynick on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 6:22:12 PM
[[IMG33]]... by Nemo on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 6:12:08 PM
Looks phallic to me. Is this some sort of tribute... by Tom Murphy on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 6:45:57 PM
And that's because of things like this.&n... by Sister Begonia on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 8:10:27 PM
You're getting what you voted for.  But l... by Bill Samuel on Friday, May 22, 2009 at 7:16:15 PM