Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (12 comments)

There's An Ugly Reason Democrats Won't Support Articles Of Impeachment - AIPAC

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (9 fans)   -- Page 1 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com

During the last few months, I’ve tried in vain to understand why the Democrats will not support an impeachment resolution against Bush or Cheney. I read hours and hours of news and facts, but it took a comment from a BuzzFlash reader to open my eyes, and what I saw almost left me speechless! It was a comment written in response to the article, “The Democrats Are Betraying The People Again! Hoyer Is A Wimp!” Through four (4) years of writing, I’ve been a staunch supporter of the people of Isreal, but have vetted my hatred for AIPAC and Zionism, so no one can accuse me of being anti-Semite for reproducing this comment, because it’s nothing but the facts:

#1 This might help explain some things:

Jewish News Weekly
LINK TO STORY

Friday November 10, 2006

New House leadership may breathe life into Jewish domestic concerns

by matthew e. berger

Washington | New faces in the congressional leadership may mean new opportunities for American Jewish groups seeking legislative solutions to many of its own concerns and those of the broader community. . .

Still, Jewish lobbyists in Washington expressed some optimism that they would be able to advance issues as diverse as raising the minimum wage, reforming immigration policy and finding a solution to the crisis in Darfur.

They also expressed confidence in the relations they have established with many of the incoming House Democratic leaders, especially the likely next speaker of the House, :-) :-) :-) Rep. NANCY PELOSI :-) :-) :-) (D-San Francisco).

Jewish groups have also established strong ties with :-) :-) :-) Rep. Steny Hoyer :-) :-) :-)(D-Md.), the frontrunner for majority leader, and Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), a Jewish lawmaker who led the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and is now considered a shoo-in for a leadership position.

Hoyer is close to Howard Friedman, the Baltimore-based president of the :-) :-) :-) American Israel Public Affairs Committee :-) :-) :-) :-) and is considered one of Israel’s :-) BEST and MOST INFLUENTIAL FRIENDS :-) on Capitol Hill.

Hoyer makes it a point to educate freshmen lawmakers about Israel issues and he has led delegations to the Jewish state multiple times. He prides himself on making Israel a bipartisan issue, vetting proposed legislation with his GOP counterpart, Rep. Roy Blunt of Missouri.

There are, however, some likely incoming committee chairmen who spark concern on certain issues, primarily because of their opposition to Israel’s settlement policy. At the same time, these lawmakers often see eye-to-eye with the Jewish communal agenda on domestic issues.

These include Rep. :-) :-) :-) John Conyers (D-Mich.) :-) :-) :-), the likely new chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and Rep. David Obey, the likely incoming chairman of the powerful House Appropriations Committee.

In general, said Richard Foltin, legislative director of the American Jewish Committee, “Among the new leaders, there will be people we have a longstanding relationship with and others we will have to build it with.”

William Daroff, vice president for public policy at United Jewish Communities, the umbrella of the North American federation system, said of Conyers: “He’s always had an open ear to the concerns of the Jewish community, particularly as it relates to its domestic agenda.”

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

http://thepoliticalbandit.com/

I am nothing more than a patriotic American that is doing whatever I can to further the cause of democracy, the rule of law, and am extremely concerned in regard the slow creep of "soft fascism" that has been destroying America's middle-class. I (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

quite a stretch by Rob Kall on Thursday, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:30:23 PM
I Don't understand the difference... by William Cormier on Friday, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:21:24 AM
At one point, the "N" word was normal usage. by Rob Kall on Friday, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:06:17 AM
I think the Congressional voting record has a lot to do w/it by Kathryn Smith on Thursday, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:33:08 PM
At risk of sounding self-contradicting: by Kathryn Smith on Thursday, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:47:57 PM
When Israel struch back, I defended them. by William Cormier on Friday, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:40:58 AM
Neocon is a more specific term by Rob Kall on Friday, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:10:48 AM
I guess it's in the eye of the beholder... by William Cormier on Friday, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:33:59 AM
Hardly anyone in Congres actually reads the full bills by William Cormier on Friday, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:52:58 AM
Thanks William! Clarification: by Kathryn Smith on Friday, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:30:39 AM
I have to respond to this briefly before I go to sleep. by William Cormier on Friday, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:34:36 PM
IMPEACHMENT by RICH SHA on Friday, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:49:17 PM