![]() |
1
1
View Ratings |
Rate It
By Nancy Tobi (about the author) Page 1 of 1 page(s)
For OpEdNews: Nancy Tobi - Writer Black Box Voting filed an antitrust complaint to the US Department of Justice
requesting they investigate the proposed merger of e-voting companies
Diebold and ES&S. Long before this merger, however, New Hampshire
initiated its own antitrust situation with Diebold Corporation. Like so
many other unconstitutional aspects of NH's election systems, the
virtual monopoly over e-voting in New Hampshire was legislated with a
wink and a nod and nary an objection from the office of the NH Attorney
General, Secretary of State, the news media, or most public officials.
In fact, the legislation itself that handed NH elections to Diebold on
a silver platter, was written in consultation with John Silvestro of
Londonderry, NH, President of Diebold's New England affiliate, LHS
Associates. The legislation was passed under the direction of then
Chair of the NH Election Law Committee, Don Stritch, with the full
support of the office of the Secretary of State. Former
Representative Stritch is now Commissioner of Rockingham County, where
LHS President John Silvestro resides. Stritch's interest in the
e-voting industry is apparent in his subsequent unsuccessful appeal to
be appointed by the NH Secretary of State to the Standards Board, a
national board of state election officials reporting to the White House
agency, the Election Assistance Commission (EAC). The Standards Board
and the EAC maintain quite a bit of influence over national adoption of
electronic voting technology, from advising on the design
specifications for the technology to participating (formally and
informally) in a disturbingly intimate network with e-voting
industrialists. Following the 2007 establishment of the NH
"Electronic Ballot Counting Device Advisory Committee" (aka electronic
voting technology committee), Stritch was appointed Chair of that
committee by Secretary of State Bill Gardner. This e-voting committee
was created by legislation passed after the Election Law Committee,
under the chairmanship of Representative Jane Clemons (D-Nashua) killed
several pieces of citizen-proposed legislation calling for open and
public vote counting. Clemons, working with Deputy Secretary of State
Dave Scanlan, instead orchestrated passage of this single bill forming
the technology voting committee, effectively putting legislative stamp
of approval on concealed vote counting by computers rather than the
constitutional mandate for public and open vote counting. The following
excerpt provides details on the shameful dealings that gave away NH's
public elections to a Diebold monopoly. In
2004 the NH legislature, with the support of the Secretary of State,
passed a bill redesigning the NH ballot. The law was written on the
advice and consultancy of LHS Associates, Diebold Election Systems
vendor for New England. LHS Associates advised the state that Diebold
optical scanners were the only voting machine that could read the new
ballot design. Additionally, LHS informed the state that the existing
firmware in NH's Diebold equipment needed to be replaced with new
firmware to read the ballots. The state paid for the
replacement of ES&S equipment with Diebold for twenty five NH
towns, as well as replacement firmware for every Diebold voting machine
in the state. In other words, as a result of this particular
legislation, New Hampshire taxpayers put a substantial sum of money
into the pockets of LHS Associates. A public records request
reveals that the initial cost proposal from LHS to conduct these
transactions was $213,000 - $303,000, with the lower figure being for
pre-2002 firmware and the higher figure being for post-2002 firmware. This
initial proposal included $40,000 to provide Manchester and Nashua with
new central tabulation software. This new software is the controversial
Diebold GEMS software, another "error-prone" product broadly implicated
in numerous election tabulation failures throughout the nation. It
appears from the state responses to record requests that the state did
not purchase the GEMS for Nashua and Manchester, although this has not
been confirmed. In response to the same public records
request, the Department of State provided one email indicating that the
State agreed to purchase 15 used voting machines. In the end, the state
was issued two invoices from LHS Associates: one for $124,555 for the
purchase of 29 Diebold Accuvote machines, and another for $7,120 for
the purchase of 178 firmware upgrades to existing Diebold machines. The
end result of this legislation was the state conveyed at least $135,000
to the bank accounts of LHS Associates. But that's not all. Many
experts believe that the new firmware now installed in all of NH voting
machines is more fraud-friendly than the older version. And NH is now
solidly a Diebold-only, 1.94W firmware, state.
www.democracyfornewhampshire.com
Nancy Tobi is co-founder, former Chair, and website editor for Democracy for New Hampshire (DFNH). She is also a founder and Chair of the NH Fair Elections Committee. Nancy is the author of numerous articles on election integrity, including "The (more...)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 2 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |