Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

General News

"The real impetus of voter ID laws is partisan"

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 3/14/12

Become a Fan
  (11 fans)
- Advertisement -

Voter Photo ID laws threaten our democracy by Joanne Boyer
There are few issues that tear at the basic fabric of democracy as much as the current assault by Republican-controlled state houses to enact voter photo ID laws, which are aimed at nothing more than restricting and suppressing eligible citizens from casting their vote. We have blogged about it and we continue to urge citizens to stay engaged and fight back at every level possible.

The Advancement Project , a national organization based in Washington , D.C. , has been one of the most vocal opponents of voter suppression laws. We urge you to visit their web site, and in particular their report What's Wrong With This Picture . The report provides some of the best analysis of the current situation and presents some of the most logical and reason-based arguments against voter ID legislation.

Judith Browne Dianis , co-director of The Advancement Project, has been a frequent guest on MSNBC and other national media outlets. She recently shared her insights and knowledge with Wisdom Voices on this critical topic that threatens the very essence of our democracy.

Q. The Advancement Project does an excellent job documenting and "debunking" the myth of voter fraud. However, polling continues to show support for voter ID laws. Can the Advancement Project provide simple information/talking points that combat the knee-jerk response of "sure, there should be ID in order to vote?"

A. The public has been misled to believe that voter fraud is rampant in this country and that photo ID is necessary to protect the integrity of elections. But the reality is voter fraud is a rarity in the United States , and voter impersonation at the polls, the only incident that could be prevented by these restrictive voter ID laws, is virtually nonexistent. An extensive analysis of data from all 50 states by the U.S. Justice Department under President Bush found that most instances of improper voting involve registration and eligibility issues, none of which would be prevented by a state photo ID restriction.One academic study found photo ID restrictions would prevent less than one fraudulent vote for every 1,000 legitimate voters who would be excluded from voting by the requirement.

Judith Brown Dianis by The Advancement Project
The real impetus of these laws is partisan.They disproportionately target African Americans, Latinos, the elderly, the young and the disabled. These are the voters who turned out in large numbers in 2008 and largely voted Democratic. It is no coincidence that the states that passed these laws are among the top electoral battleground states. Already, 20 new laws in 14 states stand to impact 5 million eligible voters in 2012 -- in states representing nearly 2/3 of the electoral votes needed to win the Presidency.

A frequent argument is that you need ID to fly on a plane, why not require one to vote. But the TSA 's website explains one can board a plane without ID if s/he agrees to answer some questions to confirm his or her identity. Moreover, the TSA will allow travelers to present numerous forms of ID -- an ID from another state, an expired driver's license, a student ID and other forms of ID that would not be acceptable to vote under voter ID proposals.Thus the question is less about whether voters should have to present identification -- most are already required to -- but rather, how restrictive the list of acceptable ID is.

What we say:

- Advertisement -

-   These laws are part of the largest legislative effort to turn back the clock on voting rights in our nation in over a century. They undermine the very pillar of our democracy -- the right of every citizen to have access to the ballot box.

-   These laws restrict the types of identification one can present at the polls to non-expired, government-issued photo identification produced only by the state in which the voter is registered to vote (a driver's or non-driver's license) or by the federal government. Some require the voter's current address be listed. Often, Veteran's IDs, student IDs, out of state or expired licenses and other forms of ID that can effectively verify identity are not considered acceptable.

-   Contrary to popular belief, everyone does not have a current, state-issued ID. About 11 percent of Americans - 21 million people - lack the types of identification required by these laws, including 25 percent of African Americans, 15 percent of those earning less than $35,000, 18 percent of citizens age 65 or older and 20 percent of voters age 18 to 29.

-   Voter ID laws are the new poll taxes thanks in part to requirements that now make it much more difficult to get a state ID. While voters can get a state-issued ID for free, they must pay for underlying documents, such as certified birth certificates and social security cards, needed to prove legal presence, identity and residency.

-   These laws are being passed for partisan gain and are intended to keep groups who tend to vote Democrat from the polls. The states that passed changes to their voting laws account for 63% of the electoral votes needed to win the presidency -- 171 votes. Of the 12 battleground states, 5 have passed restrictive voting legislation.

- Advertisement -

Q. Has the average citizen missed an important element of the story -- that the "voter ID movement" is a coordinated effort by the Republicans, via ALEC?

A. The average citizen has no idea of the corporate motives or the partisan forces behind these proposals. One way, we've attempted to educate the public is through a video we did with Brave New Foundation as part of the Koch Brothers Exposed series which has been viewed over 35,000 times. We are partnering with them in the release of the full-length film, which will expose the Koch Brothers' influence on a variety of policies, including voter ID.

We are also developing a portal on our website dedicated to voter protection and democracy where there will be an interactive map showing viewers what's happening in each state, ways to report voter intimidation, fact sheets and video that educate voters about the issue and, in cases where there are voter suppression laws we were unable to successfully challenge legally or overturn, how to get your voter ID. There will also be links to local and national organizations where people can get involved.

Next Page  1  |  2

Joanne Boyer is founder and editor of Wisdom Voices Press and Her first book is "Wisdom of Progressive Voices." Joanne has worked in professional communications for more than 30 years. Her career includes being the first (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Can Occupy Wall Street Push Us To Single Payer?

Doing The Work For The Real Health Care Victory: Single Payer

The Breadth and Depth of Voter Suppression Should Scare Us All

The Fraud of 'Voter Fraud'

Too Early To Chill The Champagne? Action Heats Up On Overturning Citizens United

On, Wisconsin: The Legacy of "Fighting Bob" LaFollette


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It's ironic that many are defending the right to f... by John Jonik on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:13:53 PM
John: Couldn't agree more...that's why I profiled... by Joanne Boyer on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:38:22 PM
Although you are correct in your assertion that Di... by Sister Begonia on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:53:10 PM
Well, if the Republicans can't win fair and square... by Sister Begonia on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:49:41 PM