Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   No comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

The magnificent obtuseness of the Washington pundits.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

An article in the August 17 Washington Post, "If You Can't Say Something Nice" has the very best collection of Republican spin, obtuseness, deception, distortion and misstatements of fact that you're likely to ever find about the godawful Bush administration.

As the title suggests, the article quotes several Republican right-wing zealots in their futile attempt to find something good to say about Bush and his so-called legacy.

Calos Lozada: "How should history, not to mention Bush himself, feel about a legacy in which the ability - which implies need - to frequently self-correct ranks as a major selling point?"

Wait a minute. What self correcting? Bush, himself, said when asked about any mistakes he had ever made, that he couldn't think of any. No need for self-correction there. Nothing to correct. And, with power unlimited by a cowardly Congress and supported by an ideologically driven, brain-washed Republican populace, Bush has the ability to completely obliterate most of the people of the world with his hare-brained, first-strike, bring-em-on, juvenile attitude, at the first push of a button. There's no way to self-correct that. How does he correct the destruction of an entire country, the killing of a million innocent people for no reason other than he felt like it? Can't be done. There's no way to correct, as Lozada implies there is, the evil that George Bush has done. You have to get it right the first time, or it's too late. The legacy of self-correction doesn't apply to irremediable blunders and mistakes.

Farad Zakaria: "In many cases the next president should follow (the foreign policies in place now), rather than reverse them."

The foreign policy in place now is the continuation of the illegal, unconstitutional, violation of the Geneva Convention, violation of the UN Charter, violation of the rule of international law, war on Iraq. Zakaria says that should continue. He doesn't understand that as long as there are US troops occupying Iraq, it is an illegal foreign policy, yet he is all for it.

David Frum: "But you can be sure of this--the next Republican president can expect to hear from pundits and academics alike that he falls far short of the high standard set by the last one."

The most frightening part of that statement is that there is even the slightest possibility that we could ever have another Republican president. The "high standards" set by Bush are appalling ignorance, illiteracy, mock bravado, violation of the law of the land, invading foreign countries on a whim, killing 4000 US soldiers by sending them off to kill innocent people just for the fun of it, setting record deficits and record national debt, just to name a few. In the mind of a civilized person other than Frum, these are not standards of any kind, but are deficiencies of intellect by a person in need of being kept in an institution, mental or penal.

And finally, the worst attempt to spin the responsibility for the 9/11 attacks away from the Republicans by pretending that they didn't actually happen on George Bush's watch.

Robert Kagan: "Judged on its own terms, the war on terror has been by far Bush's greatest success."

Except that the only devastating foreign terrorist attack on the US just happened to happen during Bush's war on terror. Bush was responsible for protecting the US from such attacks, and he failed miserably. It happened, no matter how much Kagan refuses to admit it.

"No serious observer imagined after September 11 that seven years would go by without a single additional terrorist attack on U. S. soil."

It looks like I'm not a "serious observer" because I not only imagined but also figured that seven years would go by without a terrorist attack. Actually any serious observer observes that the whole 9/11 scenario as laid out for us by the Bush administration stinks to high heaven. Not possible to be repeated.

I also observed that for more than 200 years, under 42 previous presidents, not just 7 years after having one under George Bush, there has been no terrorist attack on US soil. Kagan conveniently ignores the fact that 9/11 happened on Bush's watch.

"The next administration will be fortunate to be able to say the same (protect America from another attack on the homeland) and will be contrasted quite unfavorably with the Bush administration if it cannot."

Contrast unfavorably? Any future president who has a terrorist attack on his watch will contrast quite favorably with Bush as the only president out of 43 to actually allow the only foreign terrorist attack on US soil. He was president when it happened, it's his responsibility. Bush and these pundits are trying to have it both ways. They won't take responsibility for when it happened, but they want to take responsibility for the times when it isn't happening, through no efforts of their own. As an analogy to that, the sign on my mantle, May This House Be Safe From Tigers, works perfectly. Haven't had a single tiger.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Ed Martin is an ordinary person who is recovering from being badly over-educated. Born in the middle of the Great Depression, he is not affiliated with nor a member of any political, social or religious organization. He is especially interested in (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Conyers' year of tolerating contempt

You need to read this! Rob Kall's declaration of war

Removal of the President from Office

The worst is yet to come; foreclosure fraud is the banksters' least problem

Textbook descriptions of George Bush reveal psychopathy, and much worse.

Will we allow the Republicans to make the poor and the unemployed into the Jews of 1930s Germany?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments