Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   6 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The bogus National Exit Poll for 2008--and the NYTimes won't discuss it!

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 10/6/10

- Advertisement -
Here is Richard Charnin's powerful analysis of the "official" National Exit Poll results for the 2008 election. As he makes very clear, those numbers are preposterous.

For example, the final NEP for the '08 election tells us that there were 5.25 million returning third-party voters (4% of the electorate). This is impossible, as there had been only 1.2 million recorded third-party votes in 2004. And, according to the final '08 NEP, that election saw a quite incredible turnout of 103% of living Bush 2004 voters.

Crunching all the numbers, Charnin finds--and, it would seem, proves--that Obama did not win the last election by some 9 million votes, but by over 20 million votes. So the people's vote for "change" was not a mere "decisive victory," as the press repeatedly asserted, but a landslide pure and simple.

A Simple Proof that Obama Won by Much More than 9.5 Million Recorded Votes
http://richardcharnin.com/ObamaProof.htm
- Advertisement -


So what do mainstream pollsters make of Richard's numbers? What, for example, does the New York Times's Nate Silver have to say about them? Does he credit them, or has he found some flaw in Richard's math or reasoning?

We don't know, since Silver has refused to say a word about them. On Sept. 30, Richard posted the following comment on Silver's NYT blog--and, within minutes, that post simply disappeared.
- Advertisement -

This is how the MSM has always dealt with inconvenient evidence--not by making any argument against it, but by just refusing to discuss it.

Here, below, is Richard's post (a little rough, just as he typed it). Feel free to urge Nate Silver to reply, or at least explain why he will not.

MCM

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/the-uncanny-accuracy-of-polling-averages-part-2-what-the-numbers-say/#preview

Nate,

You gauge polling accuracy by comparing the average results to the recorded vote. You should at some point acknowledge that final LV poll projections have been accurate in matching fraudulent vote shares and that the recorded vote is never equal to the True Vote due to systemic Election Fraud.

In fact, final RV poll projections (adjusted for allocation of undecided voters) have closely matched the unadjusted and preliminary exit polls that exposed the fraudulent 2004, 2006 and 2008 elections. In each election, the Final National Exit Poll (which is always FORCED to match the recorded vote) required more returning Bush voters from the prior election than were alive in 2004 and 2008.

But you never mention the F-word. The fraud component is included in my 2010 Midterms House and Senate Forecast Model:

http://richardcharnin.com/2010ElectionForecastModels.htm

For the record, my 2004 Election Model Monte Carlo simulation gave Kerry 52% and 337 electoral votes, matching the 114,000 sample aggregate of the unadjusted state exit polls. The Final 2004 National Exit Poll required 6 million more returning Bush 2000 voters than were living in 2004.

Proof:

Bush had 50.45 million votes in 2000; the Final 2004 NEP indicated that there were 52.6 million returning Bush voters. Given 1.25% annual voter mortality and assuming 97% turnout of living Bush 2000 voters, there could have been no more than 46 million returning Bush voters. So we have over six million Bush phantoms.

Kerry won the 2004 True Vote by nearly 10 million. Yet Rasmussen had a high ranking from from you a few years ago based on his the close match of his LV to the bogus recorded Bush 3 million vote margin.

In 2008, the Election Model predicted 53.1% for Obama (he had 52.9% recorded) and exactly macthed his 365 EV. But it was wrong. The post-election True Vote model (based on the Final 2008 exit poll with a feasible returning voter mix) indicated that he had 57-58% and nearly 420 EV.

Proof:

The Final 2008 NEP required an impossible 12 million more returning Bush than Kerry voters to match the recorded vote. Bush won the bogus 2004 recorded vote by 3 million. He had 22% approval on Election Day 2008. So where did all those millions of phantom Bush voters come from? Based on the True 2004 vote, there were 10 million MORE returning Kerry voters than Bush voters.

Go to richardcharnin.com for the proof.


 

Mark's new book, Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008, a collection 14 essays on Bush/Cheney's election fraud since (and including) 2000, is just out, from Ig Publishing. He is also the author of Fooled Again: The Real Case for Electoral Reform, which is now out in paperback (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

This bill will kill small farms, and wreck our food supply

Scott Walker Goes To Chicago, Gets His Mic Checked! (Must-See)

Notorious Saudi prince is Fox News Corp's 4th-largest voting shareholder

Was Prop 8 Actually Defeated??

Peter B. Collins going off the air

Obama won by MILLIONS MORE than we've been told

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Without the assistance of official Federal, State ... by Blaine Kinsey on Thursday, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:45:51 AM
on poll results. The polling organizations are eit... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:54:42 AM
I know you condemn election fraud, but your soluti... by Blaine Kinsey on Thursday, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:01:49 PM
of this election fraud, we have only the election ... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:43:07 PM
We both know how bad the Republican Party is, but ... by Blaine Kinsey on Thursday, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:51:29 PM
Those who are incapable of organizing are incapabl... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:53:20 PM